Observational Learning with Externally Imposed and Self-Controlled Frequency of Model Demonstration

1. Wulf G., Shea Ch.H., Lewthwaite R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Medical Education 44, 75-84.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x20078758Search in Google Scholar

2. Ste-Marie D.M., Vertes K.A., Law B., Rymal A.M. (2013). Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1-10.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556355450523355826Search in Google Scholar

3. Ashford D., Davis K.W., Bennett S.J. (2007). Developmental effects influencing observational modelling: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences 25(5), 547-58. DOI: 10.1080/02640410600947025.10.1080/0264041060094702517365541Search in Google Scholar

4. Nogal M., Niźnikowski T. (2020). Feedback during learning gymnastic exercises. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury 8, 94-96.Search in Google Scholar

5. McCullagh P., Weiss M. (2001). Modeling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. In R.N. Singer, H.A. Hausenblas, C.M. Janelle (eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 205-238). New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ste-Marie D.M., Rymal A., Vertes K., Martini R. (2011). Self-modeling and competitive beam performance enhancement examined within a self-regulation perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 23, 292-307.10.1080/10413200.2011.558049Search in Google Scholar

7. Robertson R., St. Germain L., Ste-Marie D.M. (2018). The effects of self-observation when combined with a skilled model on the learning of gymnastics skills. Journal of Motor Learning and Development 6, 18-34.10.1123/jmld.2016-0027Search in Google Scholar

8. Clark S.E., Ste-Marie D.M. (2007). The impact of self-asa-model interventions on children’s self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 25, 577-586.10.1080/0264041060094709017365543Search in Google Scholar

9. Anderson R., Campbell M.J. (2015). Accelerating Skill Acquisition in Rowing Using Self-Based Observational Learning and Expert Modelling during Performance. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 10(2-3), 425-437.10.1260/1747-9541.10.2-3.425Search in Google Scholar

10. Ste-Marie D.M., Law B., Rymal A.M., Jenny O., Hall C., McCullagh P. (2012). Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: An applied model for the use of observation. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 5(2), 145-176.10.1080/1750984X.2012.665076Search in Google Scholar

11. Ste-Marie D.M., Lelievre N., St. Germain L. (2020). Revisiting the Applied Model for the Use of Observation: A Review of Articles Spanning 2011-2018. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport Jan 31, 1-24, Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1693489.10.1080/02701367.2019.169348932004119Search in Google Scholar

12. Sidaway B., Hand J. (1993). Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 64, 122-126.10.1080/02701367.1993.106087868451528Search in Google Scholar

13. Wrisberg C.A., Pein R.L. (2002). Note on learners’ control of frequency of model presentation during skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills 94, 792-794.10.2466/pms.2002.94.3.79212081283Search in Google Scholar

14. Wulf G., Raupach M., Pfeiffer F. (2005). Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 76, 107-111.10.1080/02701367.2005.1059926615810775Search in Google Scholar

15. Aiken C.A., Fairbrother J.T., Post P.G. (2012). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1-8.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00338343882022973257Search in Google Scholar

16. Sanli E.A., Patterson J.T., Bray S.R., Lee T.D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 611, 1-17.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611357688923430980Search in Google Scholar

17. Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23(5), 1382-1414.10.3758/s13423-015-0999-926833314Search in Google Scholar

18. Ste-Marie D.M., Carter M.J., Law B., Vertes K., Smith V. (2016). Self-controlled learning benefits: Exploring contributions of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation via path analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences 34, 1650-1656.10.1080/02640414.2015.113023626707002Search in Google Scholar

19. Lemos A., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R., Chiviacowsky S. (2017). Autonomy support enhances performance expectancies, positive affect, and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 31, 28-34.10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.009Search in Google Scholar

20. St. Germain L., Lelievre N., Ste-Marie D.M. (2019). Variations in observation frequency in a self-controlled learning environment do not modulate learning of a pirouette en dehors. Journal of Sports Sciences 37, 2106-2113.10.1080/02640414.2019.162147731126221Search in Google Scholar

21. Winstein C.J., Pohl P.S., Lewthwaite R. (1994). Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 65, 316-323.10.1080/02701367.1994.106076357886280Search in Google Scholar

22. Park J.H., Shea C.H., Wright D.L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: a test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior 32, 287-296.10.1080/0022289000960137910975276Search in Google Scholar

23. Ghorbani S., Bund A. (2016). Observational learning of a new motor skill: The effect of different model demonstrations. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 11(4), 514-522.10.1177/1747954116655049Search in Google Scholar

24. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.G., Buchner A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods 39(2), 175-191.10.3758/BF03193146Search in Google Scholar

25. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1), 155-159.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155Search in Google Scholar

26. Wulf G., Shea Ch.H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9, 185-211.10.3758/BF03196276Search in Google Scholar

27. Marchal-Crespo L., van Raai M., Rauter G., Wolf P., Riener R. (2013). The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task. Experimental Brain Research 231, 277-291.10.1007/s00221-013-3690-224013789Search in Google Scholar

28. Badets A., Blandin Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior 36, 62-70.10.3200/JMBR.36.1.62-7014766489Search in Google Scholar

29. Fagundes J., Chen D.D., Laguna P. (2013). Self-control and frequency of model presentation: Effects on learning a ballet passé relevé. Human Movement Science 32(4), 847-856.10.1016/j.humov.2013.03.00923973094Search in Google Scholar

30. Post P.G., Aiken C.A., Laughlin D.D., Fairbrother J.T. (2016). Self-control over combined video feedback and modeling facilitates motor learning. Human Movement Science 47, 49-59.10.1016/j.humov.2016.01.01426874750Search in Google Scholar

31. Shea C.H., Wulf G., Whitacre C. (1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. Journal of Motor Behavior 31, 119-125.10.1080/0022289990960098311177626Search in Google Scholar

32. Porter C., Greenwood D., Panchuk D., Pepping G.J. (2020). Learner-adapted practice promotes skill transfer in unskilled adults learning the basketball set shot. European Journal of Sport Science 20(1), 61-71.10.1080/17461391.2019.161193131079552Search in Google Scholar

33. Sigrist R., Rauter G., Riener R., Wolf P. (2013). Terminal Feedback Outperforms Concurrent Visual, Auditory, and Haptic Feedback in Learning a Complex Rowing-Type Task. Journal of Motor Behavior 45, 455-472.10.1080/00222895.2013.82616924006910Search in Google Scholar

34. Sidaway B., Bates J., Occhiogrosso B., Schlagenhaufer J., Wilkes D. (2012). Interaction of Feedback Frequency and Task Difficulty in Children’s Motor Skill Learning. Physical Therapy 92(7), 948-956.10.2522/ptj.2011037822421736Search in Google Scholar

35. Wulf G., Shea Ch.H., Matschiner S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 30, 180-192.10.1080/0022289980960133520037033Search in Google Scholar

36. Wulf G., Chiviacowsky S., Schiller E., Ávila L.T.G. (2010). Frequent external-focus feedback enhances motor learning. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 190.10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00190315379921833250Search in Google Scholar