GATE Simulation Study of the Siemens Biograph mCT 20 Excel PET/CT System

[1] Karakatsanis N, Sakellios N, Tsantilas NX, et al. Comparative evaluation of two commercial PET scanners, ECAT EXACT HR+ and Biograph 2, using GATE. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2006;569: 368-372.10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.110Search in Google Scholar

[2] Toufique Y, Kaci M, El Kharrim A, et al. Grid Applied to Monte-Carlo Simulations of Positron Emission Tomography Systems. In: IBERGRID 2012 - 6th Iberian Grid Infrastructure Conference proceedings. 2012;123-133.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Karakatsanis N, Loudos G, Rahmim A, Nikita KS. Monte-Carlo Based Characterization of the Counting Rate (NECR) Response for Personalized Optimization of the Administered Activity in Clinical PET Imaging. Frontiers Biomed Technol. 2014;1:14-34.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Townsend DW. Physical Principles and Technology of Clinical PET Imaging. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(2):133-145.10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V33N2p133Search in Google Scholar

[5] Geramifar P, Ay MR, Shamsaie Zafarghandi M, et al. Performance Comparison of Four Commercial GE Discovery PET/CT Scanners: A Monte Carlo Study Using GATE. Iran J Nucl Med 2009;17(2):26-33.10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774159Search in Google Scholar

[6] Karakatsanis N, Parasyris A, Loudos G, Nikita K. A Simulation study of the counting rate performance of clinical PET systems applying a methodology for optimizing the injected dose. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Record. 2008;5014-5019.10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774367Search in Google Scholar

[7] Karakatsanis N, Nikita K. A simulation model of the counting rate response of clinical PET systems and its application to optimize the injected dose. IEEE Int Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. 2009;398-401.10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193068Search in Google Scholar

[8] Karakatsanis N, Loudos G, Nikita KS. A methodology for optimizing the acquisition time of a clinical PET scan using GATE. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imag Conf. 2009;2896-1901.10.1109/NSSMIC.2009.5401619Search in Google Scholar

[9] MacDonald LR, Schmitz RE, Alessio AM, et al. Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(14):3723-3738.10.1088/0031-9155/53/14/002258548918574308Search in Google Scholar

[10] Geramifar P, Ay MR, Shamsaie Zafarghandi M, et al. Investigation of Time- of-Flight Benefits in an LYSO-Based PET/CT Scanner: A Monte Carlo Study Using GATE. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2011; 641;121-127.10.1016/j.nima.2011.03.030Search in Google Scholar

[11] Nikolopoulos D, Kandarakis I, Tsantilas X, et al. Comparative Study of the Ra-diation Detection Efficiency of LSO, LuAP, GSO and YAP Scintillators for Use in Positron Emission Imaging (PET) via Monte-Carlo Methods. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2006;569:350-354.10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.033Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gonias P, Bertsekas N, Karakatsanis NA, et al. Validation of a GATE Model for the Simulation of the Siemens PET/CT Biograph 6 Scanner. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2007;571:263-266.10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.078Search in Google Scholar

[13] OpenGATE Collaboration: http://wiki.opengatecollaboration.org/index.php/Users_Guide_V7.1Search in Google Scholar

[14] NEMA standards publication, NU 2-2012: Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Technical Report, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rausch I, Cal-González J, Dapra D, et al. Performance evaluation of the Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU 2-2012 standard. EJNMMI Phys. 2015;2:1-17.10.1186/s40658-015-0132-1488361526501827Search in Google Scholar

[16] http://www.adaptivecomputing.com/products/open-source/torque/Search in Google Scholar

[17] De Beenhouwer J, Staelens S, Kruecker D, et al. Cluster computing software for GATE simulations. Med Phys. 2007;34(6):1926-33.10.1118/1.273199317654895Search in Google Scholar

[18] Thielemans K, Tsoumpas Ch, Sauge D, et al. STIR Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction: User’s Guide, Version 3.0, 2015, http://stir.sourceforge.net/documentation/STIR-UsersGuide.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Loening A, Sau P. Amide a Medical Image Data Examiner: User's Manual V0.3.1, 2014, http://amide.sourceforge.net/help/C/index.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Lashkari S, Sarkar S, Ay MR, Rahmim A. The Influence of crystal Material on Intercrystal Scattering and the Parallax Effectin PET block Detectors: A Monte Carlo Study. In: Abu Osman NA, Ibrahim F, Wan Abas WAB, et al. (eds) 4th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2008. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 21. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 633-636.10.1007/978-3-540-69139-6_158Search in Google Scholar