[[1] AAPM, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report 55: Radiation treatment planning dosimetry verification, Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 23. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] AAPM, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report 85: Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams, Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 65, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Brahme A, Chavaudra J, Landbeg T, McCullough E., Nusslin F.,Rawlinson A, Svensson G and Svensson H. Accuracy equirements and quality assurance of external beam therapy with photons and electrons. Acta Oncol Suppl 1, 1988.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Craig T, Brochu D, Van Dyk J. A quality assurance phantom for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44: 955-966, 1999.10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00070-X]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, McCullough E, Nusslin F, Rawlinson A, Svensson G and Svensson H. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality assurance for clinical adiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys 25: 1773-1836, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency.Technical Report Series No. 430:Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer. Vienna, Austria, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] IEC Report 62083: Medical electrical equipment - Requirements for the safety of radiotherapy treatment planning systems. International Electrotechnical Commision, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] IPEMB, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology. Report 68: A guide to commissioning and quality control of treatment planning systems. York, United Kingdom, 1996. 1]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Low DA, Wong JW and Purdy J A. A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms. Med Phys 25: 1830-1836, 1998.10.1118/1.598363]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys 25: 656-661, 1998.10.1118/1.598248]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Low DA, Dempsey JF. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribition comparison method. Med. Phys. 30: 2455-2464, 2003.10.1118/1.1598711]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] McCullough E, Holmes TW. Acceptance testing of computerized radiation therapy treatment planning systems: Direct tilization of CT scandata. Med Phys 12: 237-242, 1985.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] McGee K P and Das IJ. Evaluation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) used for clinical radiotherapy: a phantom study. Med Phys 22: 1815-1827, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Mijnheer B, Olszewska A, Fiorini C, Hartmann G, Knoos T, Rosenwald JC, Welleweerd H. Quality assurance of treatment planning systems - practical examples for non-IMRT photon beams. ESTRO (European Society for herapeutic adiology and Oncology), Booklet no. 7 (Physics for Radiotherapy), ESTRO, Brussels, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Mills MD, van ‘t Veld AA and Bruinvis IA, Influence of shape on the accuracy of grid-based volume computations, Med. hys. 22: 1377-85, 1995.10.1118/1.597619]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Monitor unit calculation for high energy photon beams.ESTRO Booklet No. 3. ESTRO, Brussels, Belgium, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] NCS, Netherlands Commissionon Radiation Dosimetry. Report 12: Recommendations for the determination and use of catter correction factors of megavoltage photon beams. Delft, The Netherlands,1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry, Subcommittee Treatment Planning Systems, Quality assurance of 3-D treatment planning systems for external photon and electron beams, 2005. (http://radiationdosimetry.org/files/documents/0000016/69-ncs-rapport-15-qa-3-d-tps-external-photonand-electron-beams.pdf)]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Panitsa E, Rosenwald JC, Kappas C. Quality conrol of dose volume histogram computation characteristics of 3D treatment planning systems. Phys. Med. Biol. 43: 2807-2816, 1998.10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/010]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Rosenow U, Dannhausen H-W, Luebbert K, Nusslin F, Richter J, Robrandt B,Seelentag W-W and Wendhausen H. Quality assurance in treatment planning. Report from the German Task Group. In: The Use of Computers In Radiation Therapy, North-Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, pp. 45-58, 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] SSRMP, Swiss Society for Radiobiology and Medical Physics. Report 7: Quality control of treatment planning systems or teletherapy. ISBN 3-908125-23-5, 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Thomas SJ. Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning. Brit J Radiol 72: 781-786, 1999.10.1259/bjr.72.860.10624344]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Westermann CF, Mijnheer BJ, van Kleffens H J. Determination of theaccuracy of different computer planning systems for treatment with external photon beams. Radiother Oncol 1: 339-347, 1984. 10.1016/S0167-8140(84)80022-5]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] Van Dyk J, Barnett RB, Cygler, JE and Shragge, PC. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26: 261-273, 1993.10.1016/0360-3016(93)90206-B]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Venselaar JLM, Welleweerd J andMijnheer BJ. Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems. Radiother Oncol 60: 191-201, 2001.10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00377-2]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Venselaar JLM and Welleweerd J. Application of a test package in an intercomparison of the performance of treatment lanning systems used in a clinicalsetting. Radiother Oncol 60: 203-213, 2001.10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00304-8]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] Van ’t Veld AA. Analysis of accuracy in dose and position in calculations of a treatment planning system for blocked photon fields. Radiother Oncol 45: 245-251,1997. 10.1016/S0167-8140(97)00133-3]Search in Google Scholar
