Open Access

Repositioning sales as an influence on innovation and a source of sustainable competitive advantage


Cite

Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International journal of management reviews, 8(1), 21-47.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.xSearch in Google Scholar

Afuah, A., & Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: strategies, implementation and profits. Oxford University Press: New York.Search in Google Scholar

Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of environmental economics and policy, 7(1), 2-22.10.1093/reep/res016Search in Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The review of economic studies, 29(3), 155-173.10.2307/2295952Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. R., & Johnson, J. (1999). Entry, innovation and firm growth. In Are small firms important? Their role and impact (pp. 51-77). Springer, Boston, MA.10.1007/978-1-4615-5173-7_4Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. R., & Sabourin, D. (2002). Advanced technology use and firm performance in Canadian manufacturing in the 1990s. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 761-789.10.1093/icc/11.4.761Search in Google Scholar

Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426-432.10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053Search in Google Scholar

Bunea, O.I., Corboș, R.A., Popescu, R.I., Todircan, M. (2018). The Importance of Promotion Policy in Increasing the Competitiveness of Cultural Organizations in Romania. Case Study: The National Museum of Natural History „Grigore Antipa”. In Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference - Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020. (Vol. 1, No. 11, pp. 372-384).Search in Google Scholar

Carstea, G., Corbos, R. A., Popescu, R. I., & Bunea, O. I. (2017). ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF SOME INDICATORS ON THE PROFITABILITY OF THE FMCG RETAIL MARKET IN ROMANIA. In Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 481-492). Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.Search in Google Scholar

Cârstea, G., Deac, V. Popa, I. & Podgoreanu, S. (2002). Analiza strategică a mediului concurenţial. Editura Economică: București.Search in Google Scholar

Chow, S. C., Shao, J., Wang, H., & Lokhnygina, Y. (2017). Sample size calculations in clinical research. Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781315183084Search in Google Scholar

Clark, J., & Guy, K. (1998). Innovation and competitiveness: a review: Practitioners’ forum. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(3), 363-395.10.1080/09537329808524322Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155Search in Google Scholar

Corbos, R. A. (2011). Integration and Competition–Appropriate Approaches for Achieving Excellence in Management. Business Excellence and Management, 1(1), 67-73.Search in Google Scholar

Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairessec, J. (1998). Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 7(2), 115-158.10.1080/10438599800000031Search in Google Scholar

Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, Č., & Rojec, M. (2011). Innovation and firms’ productivity growth in Slovenia: Sensitivity of results to sectoral heterogeneity and to estimation method. In Innovation, Growth and Competitiveness (pp. 165-193). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-14965-8_8Search in Google Scholar

Dell, R. B., Holleran, S., & Ramakrishnan, R. (2002). Sample size determination. ILAR journal, 43(4), 207-213.10.1093/ilar.43.4.207Search in Google Scholar

Dupont, W. D., & Plummer Jr, W. D. (1990). Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Controlled clinical trials, 11(2), 116-128.10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-MSearch in Google Scholar

Erkkilä, T., & Piironen, O. (2018). Rankings and Global Knowledge Governance: Higher Education, Innovation and Competitiveness. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-68941-8Search in Google Scholar

Fagerberg, J. (2018). Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy, 47(9), 1568-1576.10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012Search in Google Scholar

Frishammar, J., Richtnér, A., Brattström, A., Magnusson, M., & Björk, J. (2018). Opportunities and challenges in the new innovation landscape: Implications for innovation auditing and innovation management. European Management Journal.10.1016/j.emj.2018.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 10(2), 486.10.5812/ijem.3505369361123843808Search in Google Scholar

Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford review of economic policy, 22(4), 483-498.10.1093/oxrep/grj028Search in Google Scholar

Halpern, L., & Muraközy, B. (2012). Innovation, productivity and exports: the case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(2), 151-173.10.1080/10438599.2011.561995Search in Google Scholar

Harwiki, W., Choiron, A., & Hartini, S. (2018). BATIK CREATIVE INDUSTRY: CREATIVITY, INNOVATION AND COMPETITIVENESS TO ENCOUNTER GLOBAL MARKET. JBFEM, 1(2), 189-196.10.32770/jbfem.vol1189-196Search in Google Scholar

Hashi, I., & Stojcic, N. (2010). The Impact of Innovation Activities on Firm Performance Using a Multi (Stage Model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. (Working Paper No. 410/2010). Network Studies and Analyses. Warsaw.10.2139/ssrn.1680935Search in Google Scholar

Kamasak, R. (2015). Determinants of innovation performance: a resource-based study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1330-1337.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.311Search in Google Scholar

Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 38(1), 52-54.10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52359158723495371Search in Google Scholar

Kotrlik, J. W. K. J. W., & Higgins, C. C. H. C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43.Search in Google Scholar

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.10.1177/001316447003000308Search in Google Scholar

Lee, C. (2004). The determinants of innovation in the Malaysian manufacturing sector: an econometric analysis at the firm level. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 21(3), 319-329.10.1355/AE21-3ESearch in Google Scholar

Lehtoranta, O. (2005). Determinants of Innovation and the Economic Growth of Innovators. Tracing the evolution of innovative firms over time.Search in Google Scholar

Lööf, H., Peters, B., & Janz, N. (2004). Innovation and productivity in German and Swedish manufacturing firms: Is there a common story?. Problems & perspectives in management, 2, 184-204.Search in Google Scholar

Machin, D., Campbell, M. J., Tan, S. B., & Tan, S. H. (2018). Sample Sizes for Clinical, Laboratory and Epidemiology Studies. John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118874905Search in Google Scholar

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530.10.1093/biomet/57.3.519Search in Google Scholar

Masso, J., & Vahter, P. (2008). Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: econometric evidence from innovation surveys. The European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 240-261.10.1080/09578810802060751Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, R. I., Corboş, R. A., & Bunea, O. I. (2018). STUDY ON THE PERCEPTION OF YOUNG ROMANIANS ON THE ECO-MARKETING AND PROMOTION EFFICIENCY IN INCREASING THE ENVIRONMENTAL NGOs COMPETITIVENESS. Calitatea, 19(S1), 417-422.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, R. I., Corbos, R. A., Comănescu, M., & Bunea, O. I. (2017). Ecological Marketing– Strategic Option for Business Development in Bucharest. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 51(2), 67-83.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of business strategy, 5(3), 60-78.10.1108/eb039075Search in Google Scholar

Razali, N.M. & Wah, Y.B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.Search in Google Scholar

Romanian National Institute of Statistics (2018). Research-Development and Innovation. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/index.jsp?page=tempo2&lang=en&context=37.Search in Google Scholar

Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L., & Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really robust? Methodology.10.1027/1614-2241/a000016Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, S.S. & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality. Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591Search in Google Scholar

Shieh, G. (2018). Sample size determination for examining interaction effects in factorial designs under variance heterogeneity. Psychological methods, 23(1), 113.10.1037/met000015028493739Search in Google Scholar

Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1-22.Search in Google Scholar

Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018). Innovation Management Challenges: From fads to fundamentals. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(05), 1840007.10.1142/S1363919618400078Search in Google Scholar

Trott, P. (2008). Innovation management and new product development. Pearson education.Search in Google Scholar

Ulusoy, G., Kılıç, K., Günday, G., & Alpkan, L. (2010). Innovation determinants in manufacturing firms.Search in Google Scholar

Vakhitova, G., & Pavlenko, T. (2010). Innovation and productivity: A firm level study of Ukrainian manufacturing sector. Discussion Papers, 27.Search in Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. M., & Kleinman, K. P. (2003). Good study design and analysis plans as features of ethical research with humans. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 25(5), 11-14.10.2307/3564600Search in Google Scholar

Zehir, C., Can, E., & Karaboga, T. (2015). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the role of differentiation strategy and innovation performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 358-367.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.381Search in Google Scholar

Zemplinerová, A., & Hromádková, E. (2012). Determinants of firm’s innovation. Prague Economic Papers, 21(4), 487-503.10.18267/j.pep.436Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2558-9652
Language:
English