Cite

Fig. 1:

Vertically linked supply chain structure (Bäckstrand 2007).
Vertically linked supply chain structure (Bäckstrand 2007).

Fig. 2:

Map of the working position of the surveyor. (Source: Authors).
Map of the working position of the surveyor. (Source: Authors).

Fig. 3:

The chart shows the work experience of the survey participants. (Source: Authors).
The chart shows the work experience of the survey participants. (Source: Authors).

Fig. 4:

The chart shows the proportion of surveyors’ construction enterprises that have approached the supply chain. (Source: Authors).
The chart shows the proportion of surveyors’ construction enterprises that have approached the supply chain. (Source: Authors).

Fig. 5:

The chart shows how to maintain relationships with customers of construction enterprises. (Source: Authors).
The chart shows how to maintain relationships with customers of construction enterprises. (Source: Authors).

Fig. 6:

The chart shows how to maintain relationships with material suppliers of construction enterprises. (Source: Authors).
The chart shows how to maintain relationships with material suppliers of construction enterprises. (Source: Authors).

Fig. 7:

The chart shows the business’s relationship with partners. (Source: Authors).
The chart shows the business’s relationship with partners. (Source: Authors).

Fig. 8:

The chart assesses the role of a partnership in supply chain management success. (Source: Authors).
The chart assesses the role of a partnership in supply chain management success. (Source: Authors).

Fig. 9:

The chart assesses the impact of factors affecting the relationship between members of the construction supply chain. (Source: Authors).
The chart assesses the impact of factors affecting the relationship between members of the construction supply chain. (Source: Authors).

The surveyor evaluated the relationship of the construction enterprise with partners.

Very bad Wrong Normal Good Very good Sum
Number of votes 2 5 31 69 25 132
Percentage (%) 1.52 3.79 23.48 52.27 18.94 100

Summarisation of the number of satisfactory surveys.

Method Meet in person Make a call Via the form Google forms Sum
Ticket Rate (%)
Valid votes 25 20 87 132 88
Number of votes submitted 25 20 105 150 100

Number of survey participants corresponding to enterprise size.

Enterprise size Number of employees Number of respondents Percentage (%)
Large Over 200 employees 24 18.18
Medium From 101 to 200 workers 45 34.09
Small From 11 to 100 employees 54 40.91
Micro No more than 10 employees 9 6.82
Sum 132 100

Survey results of construction enterprises having approached supply chain management.

Surveyors from large construction enterprises Surveyor from medium construction enterprise Surveyor from small construction enterprise Surveyor from micro construction enterprise Sum
Person %
Reached 24 43 26 0 93 70.45
Not yet reached 0 2 28 9 39 29.55
Sum 24 45 54 9 132 100

Assessment of the impact of factors on the overall relationship of supply chain members.

No. Element group 1 2 3 4 5 RII
Number of votes (%) Number of votes (%) Number of votes (%) Number of votes (%) Number of votes (%)
1 Trust between supply chain members 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 27 20.45% 52 39.39% 53 40.15% 4.20
2 Information sharing 3 2.27% 3 2.27% 18 13.64% 72 54.55% 36 27.27% 4.02
3 Choosing the right partner 3 2.27% 3 2.27% 27 20.45% 57 43.18% 42 31.82% 4.00
4 Risk/benefit sharing 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 36 27.27% 66 50.00% 30 22.73% 3.95
5 Senior leadership commitment 5 3.79% 3 2.27% 24 18.18% 66 50.00% 34 25.76% 3.92
6 Problem solving 0 0.00% 3 2.27% 30 22.73% 81 61.36% 18 13.64% 3.86
7 Trading frequency 0 0.00% 6 4.55% 42 31.82% 63 47.73% 21 15.91% 3.75
8 Collaborative culture 9 6.82% 9 6.82% 30 22.73% 60 45.45% 24 18.18% 3.61
eISSN:
1847-6228
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, other