Cite

Aven, T. (2010). On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 95(No. 6), pp. 623–631. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011.AvenT.2010On how to define, understand and describe riskReliability Engineering & System Safety956623631http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.01110.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011Search in Google Scholar

Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), pp. 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.AvenT.2016Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundationEuropean Journal of Operational Research2531113http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.02310.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Baloi, D., & Price, A. D. F. (2003). Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), pp. 261–269. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0.BaloiD.PriceA. D. F.2003Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performanceInternational Journal of Project Management214261269http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-010.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0Search in Google Scholar

Banaitienė, N., Banaitis, A., & Norkus, A. (2011). Risk management in projects: peculiarities of Lithuanian construction companies. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 15(1), pp. 60–73. http://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2011.568675.BanaitienėN.BanaitisA.NorkusA.2011Risk management in projects: peculiarities of Lithuanian construction companiesInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management1516073http://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2011.56867510.3846/1648715X.2011.568675Search in Google Scholar

Carter, A. and Chinyio, E. (2010), “Effectiveness of risk management : Barriers and solutions”, in PM-05 Advancing Project Management for the 21st Century: Concepts, Tools & Techniques for Managing Successful Projects, Crete, Greece, pp. 135–143.CarterA.ChinyioE.2010“Effectiveness of risk management : Barriers and solutions”, in PM-05 Advancing Project Management for the 21st CenturyConcepts, Tools & Techniques for Managing Successful ProjectsCrete, Greece135143Search in Google Scholar

Clive, K. (2014). How to Develop Meaningful Key Performance Indicators. Intrafocus.CliveK.2014How to Develop Meaningful Key Performance IndicatorsIntrafocusSearch in Google Scholar

Corona-Suárez, G., AbouRizk, S. M. and Karapetrovic, S. (2014), “Simulation-Based Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assessing the Effect of Project Quality Management on Construction Performance”, Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering, Article ID 203427, 18 pages. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/203427.Corona-SuárezG.AbouRizkS. M.KarapetrovicS.2014“Simulation-Based Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assessing the Effect of Project Quality Management on Construction Performance”Journal of Quality and Reliability EngineeringArticle ID 203427, 18 pages. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/203427.10.1155/2014/203427Search in Google Scholar

Dallas, M. (2008). Value & Risk Management (A Guide to Best Practice). Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.DallasM.2008Value & Risk Management (A Guide to Best Practice)Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKSearch in Google Scholar

Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., Anac, C., Tah, J. H. M., & Aouad, G. (2008). Learning from risks: A tool for post-project risk assessment. Automation in Construction, 18(1), pp. 42–50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.008.DikmenI.BirgonulM. T.AnacC.TahJ. H. M.AouadG.2008Learning from risks: A tool for post-project risk assessmentAutomation in Construction1814250http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.00810.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.008Search in Google Scholar

Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), pp. 79–119. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001.Franco-SantosM.LucianettiL.BourneM.2012Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for researchManagement Accounting Research23279119http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.00110.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M., & Bokor, O. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter? Automation in Construction, 65, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.003.HajduM.BokorO.2016Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter?Automation in Construction6518https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.00310.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Hillson, D. (2007). Understanding the risk management universe – Consensus and Controversy. In: Hillson, D. (ed.), The Risk Management Universe: A Guided Tour. BSI Standards, London.HillsonD.2007Understanding the risk management universe – Consensus and ControversyIn:HillsonD.(ed.)The Risk Management Universe: A Guided TourBSI StandardsLondon10.3403/9780580503467Search in Google Scholar

Hillson, D. (2009). Managing Risk in Projects (Fundamentals of Project Management). Grower Publishing Limited, Surrey, England.HillsonD.2009Managing Risk in Projects (Fundamentals of Project Management)Grower Publishing LimitedSurrey, EnglandSearch in Google Scholar

Howard, R. and Serpell, A. (2012), “Procurement management: analyzing key risk management factors”, in RICS Cobra 2012, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 1461–1469.HowardR.SerpellA.2012“Procurement management: analyzing key risk management factors”inRICS Cobra 2012Las Vegas, USA14611469Search in Google Scholar

Hubbard, D. W. (2009). The Failure of Risk Management. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ.HubbardD. W.2009The Failure of Risk ManagementJohn Wiley and Sons IncHoboken, NJSearch in Google Scholar

Hubbard, D. W. (2010). How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Hoboken.HubbardD. W.2010How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in BusinessJohn Wiley & Sons LtdHoboken10.1002/9781118983836Search in Google Scholar

ISO (2009), ISO 31000:2009ISO2009ISO 31000:2009Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1993). Putting the Balanced Scorecard to work, Harvard Business Review, September – October, pp. 134–147.KaplanR.NortonD.1993Putting the Balanced Scorecard to workHarvard Business ReviewSeptember – October134147Search in Google Scholar

Kennerly, M., & Neely, A. (2004). Performance measurement frameworks: A review. In: Neely, A. (ed.), Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753695.010.KennerlyM.NeelyA.2004Performance measurement frameworks: A reviewIn:NeelyA.(ed.)Business Performance Measurement: Theory and PracticeCambridge University PressCambridge, UK145154https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753695.01010.1017/CBO9780511753695.010Search in Google Scholar

Khameneh, A.-H., Taheri, A., & Ershadi, M. (2016). Offering a framework for evaluating the performance of project risk management system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, pp. 82–90. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspro.2016.06.165.KhamenehA.-H.TaheriA.ErshadiM.2016Offering a framework for evaluating the performance of project risk management systemProcedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences2268290http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspro.2016.06.16510.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.165Search in Google Scholar

Lee, E., Park, Y., & Shin, J. G. (2009). Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), pp. 5880–5887. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.057.LeeE.ParkY.ShinJ. G.2009Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief networkExpert Systems with Applications36358805887http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.05710.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.057Search in Google Scholar

Likierman, A. (2007). In: Neely, A. (ed.), Risk in performance measurement. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.016.LikiermanA.2007In:NeelyA.(ed.)Risk in performance measurementCambridge University PressNew Yorkhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.01610.1017/CBO9780511488481.016Search in Google Scholar

Malcom, D. G., Roseboom, J. H., Clark, C. E., & Fazar, W. (1959). Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation. Operations Research, 7(5), pp. 646–669.MalcomD. G.RoseboomJ. H.ClarkC. E.FazarW.1959Application of a technique for research and development program evaluationOperations Research7564666910.1287/opre.7.5.646Search in Google Scholar

Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Echeverría Lazcano, A. M., & Villanueva, P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), pp. 327–340. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.009.Marcelino-SádabaS.Pérez-EzcurdiaA.Echeverría LazcanoA. M.VillanuevaP.2014Project risk management methodology for small firmsInternational Journal of Project Management322327340http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.00910.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.009Search in Google Scholar

Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, 25(2), pp. 173–186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007.MelnykS. A.BititciU.PlattsK.TobiasJ.AndersenB.2014Is performance measurement and management fit for the future?Management Accounting Research252173186http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.00710.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Mikes, A. and Kaplan, R. (2013), Towards a Contingency Theory of Enterprise Risk Management, No. 13–063). Harvard Business School. Retrieved from http://www.hec.unil.ch/documents/seminars/dcc/1102.pdf.MikesA.KaplanR.2013Towards a Contingency Theory of Enterprise Risk ManagementNo. 13–063)Harvard Business SchoolRetrieved from http://www.hec.unil.ch/documents/seminars/dcc/1102.pdf.10.2139/ssrn.2311293Search in Google Scholar

NASA. (2011). NASA Risk Management Handbook. Washington, D.C.NASA2011NASA Risk Management HandbookWashington, D.CSearch in Google Scholar

Osipova, E., & Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), pp. 391–399. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.007.OsipovaE.ErikssonP. E.2013Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projectsInternational Journal of Project Management313391399http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.00710.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Papadaki, M., Gale, A., Rimmer, J. and Kirkham, R. (2010), “Factors Influencing Project Risk Management Decision Making”, in PM-05 Advancing Project Management for the 21st Century: Concepts, Tools & Techniques for Managing Successful Projects, Crete, Greece, pp. 536–544.PapadakiM.GaleA.RimmerJ.KirkhamR.2010“Factors Influencing Project Risk Management Decision Making”inPM-05 Advancing Project Management for the 21st Century: Concepts, Tools & Techniques for Managing Successful ProjectsCrete, Greece536544Search in Google Scholar

Pimchangthong, D., & Boonjing, V. (2017). Effects of Risk Management Practices on IT Project Success. Management and Production Engineering Review, 8(1), pp. 30–37. http://doi.org/10.1515/mper-2017-0004.PimchangthongD.BoonjingV.2017Effects of Risk Management Practices on IT Project SuccessManagement and Production Engineering Review813037http://doi.org/10.1515/mper-2017-000410.1515/mper-2017-0004Search in Google Scholar

Ren, Y., Yeo, K. T., & Ren, Y. (2014). Risk Management Capability Maturity and Performance of Complex Product and System (CoP) Projects with an Asian Perspective. Journal of Engineering, Project and Production Management, 4(2), pp. 81–98.RenY.YeoK. T.RenY.2014Risk Management Capability Maturity and Performance of Complex Product and System (CoP) Projects with an Asian PerspectiveJournal of Engineering, Project and Production Management42819810.32738/JEPPM.201407.0004Search in Google Scholar

Serpell, A., Ferrada, X., Howard, R. and Rubio, L. (2014), “Risk management in construction projects: a knowledge-based approach”, in 27th IPMA (International Project Management Association) World Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1–5.SerpellA.FerradaX.HowardR.RubioL.2014“Risk management in construction projects: a knowledge-based approach”in27th IPMA (International Project Management Association) World CongressDubrovnik, Croatia1510.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.073Search in Google Scholar

Standars Australia. (2007). AS/NZS 4360:2004 Risk Management. Standars Australia, New Zealand.Standars Australia2007AS/NZS 4360:2004 Risk ManagementStandars AustraliaNew ZealandSearch in Google Scholar

Szymański, P. (2017). Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 208, pp. 174–182. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036.SzymańskiP.2017Risk management in construction projectsProcedia Engineering208174182http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.03610.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, A., & Taylor, M. (2014). Factors influencing effective implementation of performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and large firms: a perspective from Contingency Theory. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), pp. 847–866. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.842023.TaylorA.TaylorM.2014Factors influencing effective implementation of performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and large firms: a perspective from Contingency TheoryInternational Journal of Production Research523847866http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.84202310.1080/00207543.2013.842023Search in Google Scholar

Tohidi, H. (2011). The role of risk management in IT systems of organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 3, pp. 881–887. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.144.TohidiH.2011The role of risk management in IT systems of organizationsProcedia Computer Science3881887http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.14410.1016/j.procs.2010.12.144Search in Google Scholar

Van Slyke, R. (1963). Monte Carlo methods and the PERT Problem. Operations Research, 11(5), pp. 839–860.Van SlykeR.1963Monte Carlo methods and the PERT ProblemOperations Research11583986010.1287/opre.11.5.839Search in Google Scholar

Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), pp. 97–105. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1.WardS.ChapmanC.2003Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty managementInternational Journal of Project Management21297105http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-110.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1Search in Google Scholar

Washington State Department of Transportation (2014), Project Risk Management Guide, Washington State Department of Transportation.Washington State Department of Transportation2014Project Risk Management GuideWashington State Department of TransportationSearch in Google Scholar

Wolbers, M. (2009), Application of risk management in Public Works organizations in Chile, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile/University of Twente.WolbersM.2009Application of risk management in Public Works organizations in ChilePontificia Universidad Católica de Chile/University of TwenteSearch in Google Scholar

Zaleha, S., Rasid, A., Golshan, N. M., Khairuzzaman, W. and Ismail, W. (2012), “Risk Management, Performance measurement and Organizational performance: A Conceptual Framework”, in 3rd International Conference on Business and Economic Research, Bandung, Indonesia, pp. 1702–1715.ZalehaS.RasidA.GolshanN. M.KhairuzzamanW.IsmailW.2012“Risk Management, Performance measurement and Organizational performance: A Conceptual Framework”in3rd International Conference on Business and Economic ResearchBandung, Indonesia17021715Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Y. (2016). Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), pp. 819–830. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.001.ZhangY.2016Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependenceInternational Journal of Project Management345819830http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.00110.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), pp. 601–614. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001.ZouP. X. W.ZhangG.WangJ.2007Understanding the key risks in construction projects in ChinaInternational Journal of Project Management256601614http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.00110.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1847-6228
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Engineering, Introductions and Overviews, other