This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Arditi, D., Bell, L., Gann, D., Hughes, W., Lessard, D., Levitt, R., et al. (2014). Grand challenges in engineering project organization: EPOS vision statements, Working Paper Series. In: Taylor, J. T., Chinowsky, P. & Sakhrani, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Winter Park, CO, July 29–31.ArditiD.BellL.GannD.HughesW.LessardD.LevittR.2014Grand challenges in engineering project organization: EPOS vision statements, Working Paper SeriesIn:TaylorJ. T.ChinowskyP.SakhraniV.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceWinter Park, COJuly 29–31Search in Google Scholar
Awuzie, B. O., & McDermott, P. (2014). Evaluating the impact of national culture on viability within infrastructure delivery systems, Working Paper Series. In: Taylor, J. T., Chinowsky, P., & Sakhrani, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Winter Park, CO, July 29–31.AwuzieB. O.McDermottP.2014Evaluating the impact of national culture on viability within infrastructure delivery systems, Working Paper SeriesIn:TaylorJ. T.ChinowskyP.SakhraniV.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceWinter Park, COJuly 29–31Search in Google Scholar
Biesenthal, C., & Wilden, R. (2014). Multi-level project governance: Trends and opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 32, pp. 1291–1308.BiesenthalC.WildenR.2014Multi-level project governance: Trends and opportunitiesInternational Journal of Project Management321291130810.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.005Search in Google Scholar
Brockman, C. (2009). Mega-Projects: Getting the Job Done. In: Proceedings LEAD Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA. Brockman, C., & Girmsheid, G. (2007). Complexity of Megaprojects.BrockmanC.2009Mega-Projects: Getting the Job DoneIn:Proceedings LEAD ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CASearch in Google Scholar
Brockman, C., & Girmsheid, G. (2007). Complexity of Megaprojects. In: Milford, R. (ed.), Proceedings of CIB World Building Congress: Construction for Development, South Africa, May 14–17, pp. 219–230.BrockmanC.GirmsheidG.2007Complexity of MegaprojectsIn:MilfordR.(ed.)Proceedings of CIB World Building Congress: Construction for DevelopmentSouth AfricaMay 14–17219230Search in Google Scholar
Brooks, N. J., & Locatelli, G. (2015). Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management. Utility Policy, 36, pp. 57–66.BrooksN. J.LocatelliG.2015Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction managementUtility Policy36576610.1016/j.jup.2015.09.005Search in Google Scholar
Ceric, A. (2016). Trust in Construction Projects. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, and New York.CericA.2016Trust in Construction ProjectsRoutledgeAbingdon, Oxon, and New YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Chan, H., & Levitt, R. (2009). Strategic and cultural drivers of renegotiation approaches in infrastructure concession agreements. In: Proceedings LEAD Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA.ChanH.LevittR.2009Strategic and cultural drivers of renegotiation approaches in infrastructure concession agreementsInProceedings LEAD ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CASearch in Google Scholar
Chi, C. S. F., Ruuska, I., Levitt, R., Ahola, T., & Artto, K. (2011). A relational governance approach for megaprojects: Case studies of Beijing 3 and Bird’s Nest Projects in China, Working Paper Series. In: Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Estes Park, CO, August 9–12.ChiC. S. F.RuuskaI.LevittR.AholaT.ArttoK.2011A relational governance approach for megaprojects: Case studies of Beijing 3 and Bird’s Nest Projects in China, Working Paper SeriesInProceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceEstes Park, COAugust 9–12Search in Google Scholar
Collins W., Parrish K., & Gibson G. E. (2015). Improving project performance within industrial focused organizations with the project definition rating index for small industrial projects, Working Paper Series. In: Dossik, C., & Macht, G. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, June 24–26.CollinsW.ParrishK.GibsonG. E.2015Improving project performance within industrial focused organizations with the project definition rating index for small industrial projects, Working Paper SeriesIn:DossikC.MachtG.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceThe University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UKJune 24–26Search in Google Scholar
Davies, A., Frederiksen, L., & Dewulf, G. (2010). Business models, infrastructure and the changing public-private interface, Working Paper Series. In: Taylor, J., & Chinowsky, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA, November 4–6.DaviesA.FrederiksenL.DewulfG.2010Business models, infrastructure and the changing public-private interface, Working Paper SeriesIn:TaylorJ.ChinowskyP.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CANovember 4–6Search in Google Scholar
Edkins, A., & Zerjav, V. (2014). A policy program on infrastructure interdependencies: Implications for front-end project management and opportunities for research, Working Paper Series. In: Taylor, J. T., Chinowsky, P., & Sakhrani, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Winter Park, CO, July 29–31.EdkinsA.ZerjavV.2014A policy program on infrastructure interdependencies: Implications for front-end project management and opportunities for research, Working Paper SeriesIn:TaylorJ. T.ChinowskyP.SakhraniV.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceWinter Park, COJuly 29–31Search in Google Scholar
Edkins, A., & Smith, A. (2016). The challenge of managing modern complex projects, Working Paper Series. In: Kaminsky, J., & Zerjav, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Cle Elum, WA, June 28–30.EdkinsA.SmithA.2016The challenge of managing modern complex projects, Working Paper SeriesIn:KaminskyJ.ZerjavV.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceCle Elum, WAJune 28–30Search in Google Scholar
Feng, W., Lessard, D., Cameron, B. G., & Crawely, E. F. (2013). Stakeholders, issues, and the shaping of large engineering projects, Working Paper Series. In: Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Winter Park, CO, July 9–11.FengW.LessardD.CameronB. G.CrawelyE. F.2013Stakeholders, issues, and the shaping of large engineering projects, Working Paper SeriesInProceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceWinter Park, COJuly 9–11Search in Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.FlyvbjergB.2003Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of AmbitionCambridge University PressCambridge10.1017/CBO9781107050891Search in Google Scholar
Haidar, A., & Ellis, R. D. (2010). Analysis and improvement of megaprojects performance, Working Paper Series. In: Taylor, J., & Chinowsky, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA, November 4–6.HaidarA.EllisR. D.2010Analysis and improvement of megaprojects performance, Working Paper SeriesIn:TaylorJ.ChinowskyP.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CANovember 4–6Search in Google Scholar
Harty, C., & Whyte, J. (2008). The role of media in construction design work and ecologies of practice. In: Proceedings LEAD Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA.HartyC.WhyteJ.2008The role of media in construction design work and ecologies of practiceInProceedings LEAD ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CASearch in Google Scholar
Ho, S. P., & Lin, Y.-C. (2010). A model for the internationalization process of construction firms: A dynamic OLI view, Working Paper Series. In: Taylor, J., & Chinowsky, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA, November 4–6.HoS. P.LinY.-C.2010A model for the internationalization process of construction firms: A dynamic OLI view, Working Paper SeriesIn:TaylorJ.ChinowskyP.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CANovember 4–6Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Y., Chan, A., & Le, Y. (2012). Conceptual framework of program organization for managing construction megaprojects – Chinese client’s perspective, Working Paper Series. In: Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Rheden, The Netherlands, July 10–12.HuY.ChanA.LeY.2012Conceptual framework of program organization for managing construction megaprojects – Chinese client’s perspective, Working Paper SeriesInProceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceRheden, The NetherlandsJuly 10–12Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Y., Chan, A. P. C., Le, Y. & Jin, R.-Z. (2015). From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(4). pp. 04014052-1-04014052-11.HuY.ChanA. P. C.LeY.JinR.-Z.2015From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysisJournal of Management in Engineering31404014052-104014052-1110.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000254Search in Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation: World Bank Group. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement: A Good Practice Handbook for Companies Doing Business in Emerging Markets. IFC, Washington D. C., USA.International Finance Corporation: World Bank Group2007Stakeholder Engagement: A Good Practice Handbook for Companies Doing Business in Emerging MarketsIFCWashington D. C., USASearch in Google Scholar
Levitt, R. E. (2011). Toward Project Management 2.0, Working Paper Series. In: Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Estes Park, CO, August 9–12.LevittR. E.2011Toward Project Management 2.0, Working Paper SeriesInProceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceEstes Park, COAugust 9–12Search in Google Scholar
Lessard, D. R., & Miller, R. (2001). Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects, MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4214–01.LessardD. R.MillerR.2001Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects, MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4214–01Search in Google Scholar
Lessard, D., Sakhrani, V., & Miller, R. (2013). House of project complexity – understanding complexity in large infrastructure projects, Working Paper Series. In: Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Winter Park, CO, July 9–11.LessardD.SakhraniV.MillerR.2013House of project complexity – understanding complexity in large infrastructure projects, Working Paper SeriesInProceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceWinter Park, COJuly 9–11Search in Google Scholar
Li, K., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Wang, L., Orr, R., & Jua, Y.-K. (2010). A hybrid decision support system for efficient planning and management of mega projects, Working Paper Series. In: Taylor, J., & Chinowsky, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA, November 4–6.LiK.WangJ.ZhengY.WangL.OrrR.JuaY.-K.2010A hybrid decision support system for efficient planning and management of mega projects, Working Paper SeriesIn:TaylorJ.ChinowskyP.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CANovember 4–6Search in Google Scholar
Lundrigan, L. Gil, N., & Puranam, P. (2015). Why mega-projects (seem to?) fail: A meta-organizational perspective, Working Paper Series. In: Dossik, C., & Macht, G. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, June 24–26.LundriganL.GilN.PuranamP.2015Why mega-projects (seem to?) fail: A meta-organizational perspective, Working Paper SeriesIn:DossikC.MachtG.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceThe University of EdinburghScotland, UKJune 24–26Search in Google Scholar
Mahalingam, A. (2008). PPP experiences in Indian States: Bottlenecks, enablers and key issues. In: Proceedings LEAD Conference, South Lake Tahoe, CA.MahalingamA.2008PPP experiences in Indian States: Bottlenecks, enablers and key issuesInProceedings LEAD ConferenceSouth Lake Tahoe, CASearch in Google Scholar
Miller, R., & Lessard, D. (2000). The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and Governance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.MillerR.LessardD.2000The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and GovernanceThe MIT PressCambridge, MASearch in Google Scholar
Morris, P. (2016). Hinkley point C: The rhetoric and the reality: Risk and the management of nuclear power projects, Working Paper Series. In: Kaminsky, J., & Zerjav, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Cle Elum, WA, June 28–30.MorrisP.2016Hinkley point C: The rhetoric and the reality: Risk and the management of nuclear power projects, Working Paper SeriesIn:KaminskyJ.ZerjavV.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceCle Elum, WAJune 28–30Search in Google Scholar
Mulva, P. S. (2006). Uncovering “hidden” project benefits through program management. In: Songer, A., Chinowsky, P., & Carillo, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Specialty Conference on Leadership and Management in Construction, Grand Bahama Island, Bahamas, May 4–6.MulvaP. S.2006Uncovering “hidden” project benefits through program managementIn:SongerA.ChinowskyP.CarilloP.(eds.)Proceedings of the 2nd Specialty Conference on Leadership and Management in ConstructionGrand Bahama Island, BahamasMay 4–6Search in Google Scholar
Pelham, N., & Duffield, C. (2016). Mega-project governance – a case study of the governance of a successfully delivered project, Working Paper Series. In: Kaminsky, J., & Zerjav, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Cle Elum, WA, June 28–30.PelhamN.DuffieldC.2016Mega-project governance – a case study of the governance of a successfully delivered project, Working Paper SeriesIn:KaminskyJ.ZerjavV.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceCle Elum, WAJune 28–30Search in Google Scholar
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitute or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 707–725.PoppoL.ZengerT.2002Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitute or complements?Strategic Management Journal2370772510.1002/smj.249Search in Google Scholar
Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2009). The Geography of Transport Systems, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York.RodrigueJ.-P.ComtoisC.SlackB.2009The Geography of Transport Systems2nd ednRoutledgeNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Ruuska, I., Artto, K., & Lehtonen, P. (2009). Dimensions of distance in a project network: Exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), pp. 142–153.RuuskaI.ArttoK.LehtonenP.2009Dimensions of distance in a project network: Exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plantInternational Journal of Project Management27214215310.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.003Search in Google Scholar
Sertic, J. (2013). Complexity in Construction Industry – Theoretical Baseline for Complexity Assessment in Construction Industry, Report submitted to EU COST Research Project “Mega-project” for Short Term Scientific Mission.SerticJ.2013Complexity in Construction Industry – Theoretical Baseline for Complexity Assessment in Construction IndustryReport submitted to EU COST Research Project “Mega-project” for Short Term Scientific Mission.Search in Google Scholar
Schlihter, B. R., & Rose, J. (2013). Trust dynamics in a large system implementation: Six theoretical propositions. European Journal of Information System, 32, pp. 455–477.SchlihterB. R.RoseJ.2013Trust dynamics in a large system implementation: Six theoretical propositionsEuropean Journal of Information System3245547710.1057/ejis.2012.24Search in Google Scholar
Yang, R., Wang, Y., & Jin, X.-H. (2014). Stakeholders’ attributes, behaviours, and decision strategies in construction projects: Importance and correlations in practice. Project Management Journal, 45(3), pp. 74–90.YangR.WangY.JinX.-H.2014Stakeholders’ attributes, behaviours, and decision strategies in construction projects: Importance and correlations in practiceProject Management Journal453749010.1002/pmj.21412Search in Google Scholar
Zhai, K. Z., Chi, C. S. F., & Le, Y. (2016). Relational governance in megaprojects: From the owner’s view, Working Paper Series. In: Kaminsky, J., & Zerjav, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, Cle Elum, WA, June 28–30.ZhaiK. Z.ChiC. S. F.LeY.2016Relational governance in megaprojects: From the owner’s view, Working Paper SeriesIn:KaminskyJ.ZerjavV.(eds.)Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization ConferenceCle Elum, WAJune 28–30Search in Google Scholar
