[AL-SAFI S.A.J. 2011. Study of halazone stability and methods of its removal from aqueous solutions. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 54(2), 311-324.]Search in Google Scholar
[ANTKOWIAK O., BRYTAN M., ZDANOWSKI R., KALINOWSKI R. 2011. Współczesne metody dekontaminacji bojowych środków trujących. Lek. Wojsk. 89(2), 111-115.]Search in Google Scholar
[ASADA K, TAKAHASHI M. 1987. Production and scavenging of active oxygen in photosynthesis. In: Photoinhibition, ed. DJ Kyle, CB Osmond, CJ Arntzen, pp. 227-87. Amsterdam: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[ASTM E1841 - 04(2012) Standard Guide for Conducting RenewalPhytotoxicity Tests With Freshwater Emergent Macrophytes.]Search in Google Scholar
[ASTM E1598-94 (1994): Practice for Conducting Early SeedlingGrowth Tests.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOONE C.M. 2007. Present state of CBRN decontamination methodologies. Report TD2007‑0020. TNO Defence, Security and Safety, Holandia, Rijswijk.]Search in Google Scholar
[BREEN A.P., MURPHY J.A. 1995. Reactions of oxyl radicals with DNA. Free Rod. Biol. Med. 18, 1033-1077.]Search in Google Scholar
[CANOSA P., MORALES S., RODRÍGUEZ I., RUBÍ E., CELA R., GÓMEZ M. 2005. Aquatic degradation of triclosan and formation of toxic chlorophenols in presence of low concentrations of free chlorine. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 383, 1119-1126.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAUHAN S., CHAUHAN S., D’CRUZ R., FARUQI S., SINGH K.K., VARMA S., SINGH M., KARTHIK V. 2008. Chemical warfare agents. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 26(2), 113-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[COOGAN M.A., EDZIYIE R.E., LA POINT T.W., VENABLES B.J. 2007. Algal bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan, and methyl- triclosan in a North Texas wastewater treatment plant receiving stream. Chemosphere. 67(10), 1911-1918.]Search in Google Scholar
[FRIDOVICH I. 1985. Cytochrome c. In: CRC handbook of methods for oxygen radical research. CRC Press, Boca Raton.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMPTON J.G., TEKRONY D.M.. 1995. Handbook of vigour test methods. Intl. Seed Testing Assn., Zurich, Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISTA. 1976. International rules of seed testing. Rules and annexes. International Seed Testing Association. Seed Sci. Technolog. 4,3-177.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISTA. 1999. International rules of seed testing. Rules 1999. Seed Sci. Technol. 27, 1-303.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO 11269-2:1995 Soil Quality - Determination of the effects ofpollutants on soil flora - Effects of chemicals on the emergenceand growth of higher plants.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO/CD 17126 SOIL QUALITY - Determination of the effects ofpollutants on soil flora - Seedling emergence, screeningtest with lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.).]Search in Google Scholar
[JANG H. Organic chloramines formation and its disinfection efficacy. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy. Arizona State University 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[KARNJANAPIBOONWONG A., CHASE D.A., CANAS J.E., JACKSON W.A., MAUL J.D., MORSE A.N., ANDERSON T.A. 2011. Uptake of 17a-ethynylestradiolandtriclosaninpintobean, Phaseolusvulgaris. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety. 74, 1336-1342.]Search in Google Scholar
[KHAN A.Z., SHAH P., MOHD F., KHAN H., PERVEENA.S., NIGAR S., KHALIL S.K., ZUBAIR M. 2010. Vigour tests used to rank seed lot quality and predict field emergence in wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 42(5), 3147-3155.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOOKANA R.S., YING G.G., WALLER N.J. 2011. Triclosan: its occurrence, fate and effects in the Australian environment. Wat. Sci. Tech. 3(4), 598-604.]Search in Google Scholar
[KRISTEN U. 1997. Use of Higher Plants as Screens for Toxicity Assessment. Toxicol. In Vitro. 181-191.10.1016/S0887-2333(97)00005-2]Search in Google Scholar
[LATCH D.E., PACKER J.L., ARNOLD W.A., MCNEILL K. 2003. Photochemical conversion of triclosan to 2,8-dichlorodibenzop- dioxin in aqueous solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 158, 63-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEEKS C.R.F. 2006. Determining seed vigour in selected Brassica species, Master thesis, Lincoln University.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOVE A.H., BAILEY C.G., HANNA M.L., HOK S., VU A.K., REUTTER D.J., RABER E. 2011. Efficacy of liquid and foam decontamination technologies for chemical warfare agents on indoor surfaces. J. Hazard. Mater. 196, 115-122.]Search in Google Scholar
[MANSOUR R.S., SALAMATI P., SAGHAFINIA M., ABDOLLAHI M. 2012. A review on delayed toxic effects of sulfur mustard in Iranian veterans. Daru. 20(1), 51.]Search in Google Scholar
[SANDERSON H.; THOMSEN M.; FAUSER P.; SØRENSEN P.B. 2007. PBT screening profile of chemical warfare agents (CWAs). J. Hazard. Mater. 148, 210-215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szinicz L. 2005. History of chemical and biological warfare agents. Toxicol. 214, 167-181.]Search in Google Scholar
[TERNAY JR A.L., SMART J.K., SALEM H. Brief History and Use of Chemical Warfare Agents in Warfare and Terrorism, in: Chemical Warfare Agents. Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics. CRC Press 2007.10.1201/9781420046625.ch1]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD-Guideline for the testing of chemicals: Proposal forupdating Guideline 208, 2000. Terrestrial Plant Test: SeedlingEmergence and Seedling Growth Test.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD- Guideline for the testing of chemicals: Proposal for anew Guideline 227, 2003. Terrestrial Plant Test: VegetativeVigour Test.]Search in Google Scholar
[STADTMAN E.R. 1992. Protein oxidation and aging. Science. 257, 1220-1224.]Search in Google Scholar
[Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in supportof Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessmentfor new notified substances; Commission Regulation(EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existingsubstances; Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliamentand of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal productson the market. 2003. Luxembourg.]Search in Google Scholar
[US EPA, 1996 a. OPPTS Ecological Effect Guideline, 850.4025:Target Area Phytotoxicity.]Search in Google Scholar
[US EPA, 1996 b. OPPTS Ecological Effect Guideline, 850.4100:Terrestrial Plant Toxicity, Tier I (Seedling Emergence).]Search in Google Scholar
[US EPA, 1996 c. OPPTS Ecological Effect Guideline, 850.4200:Seed Germination/Root Elongation Toxicity Test.]Search in Google Scholar
[US EPA, 1996 d. OPPTS Ecological Effect Guideline, 850.4225:Seedling Emergence, Tier II.]Search in Google Scholar
[US EPA, 1996 e. OPPTS Ecological Effect Guideline, 850.4230:Early Seedling Growth Toxicity Test.]Search in Google Scholar
[VIEIRA R.D., NETO A.S., MUDROVITSCH DE BITTENCOURT S.R., PANOBIANCO M. 2004. Electrical conductivity of the seed soaking solution and soybean seedling emergence. Sci. Agric. 61(2).10.1590/S0103-90162004000200007]Search in Google Scholar
[WU C., SPONGBERG A.L., WITTER J.D., FANG M., CZAJKOWSKI K.P. 2010. Uptake of pharmaceutical and personal care products by soybean plants from soils applied with biosolids and irrigated with contaminated water. Environ. Sci. Tech. 44(16), 6157-6161.]Search in Google Scholar
[WAYSBORT D., MCGARVEY D.J., CREASY W.R., MORRISSEY K.M., HENDRICKSON D.M., DURST H.D. 2009. A decontamination system for chemical weapons agents using a liquid solution on a solid sorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 1114-1121.]Search in Google Scholar
[YANG Y., BAKER J.A., WARD R. 1992. Decontamination of chemical warfare agents. Chem. Rev. 92(8), 1729-1743.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZAFARGHANDI M.R., SOROUSH M.R., MAHMOODI M., NAIENI K.H., ARDALAN A., DOLATYARI A., FALAHATI F., MIRMOHAMMADKHANI M., MOUSAVI B., GHANEI M. 2013. Incidence of cancer in Iranian sulfur mustard exposed veterans: a long-term follow-up cohort study. Cancer Causes Control. 24(1), 99-105.]Search in Google Scholar
