[Agile Business Consortium (2014). The DSDM Agile Project Framework. Retrieved from https://www.agile-business.org/page/TheDSDMAgileProjectFramework]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, D. J. (2010). Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business. Washington: Blue Hole Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[OGC (2017). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. London: TSO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beck, K. (2004). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Second Edition. Addison-Wesley Professional.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boehm, B. & Turner, R. (2004). Balancing agility and discipline: evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods. Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2004.131750310.1109/ICSE.2004.1317503]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[IEEE (2014). Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK V3.0). IEEE Computer Society Press. 335 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bushuev, S. D., & Neizvestnyy, S. I. (2013). The project management methodologies genome as the universal knowledge model. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 14, 15–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conforto E., Salum F., Amaral D., et al. (2014). Can Agile Project Management Be Adopted by Industries Other than Software Development? Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.2141010.1002/pmj.21410]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Čelesnik, G., Radujković, M., & Vrečko, I. (2018). Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management. Organizacija, 51(4), 223-237. http://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-002310.2478/orga-2018-0023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gallup (2012). The cost of bad project management. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/business-journal/152429/cost-bad-project-management.aspx]Search in Google Scholar
[Gartner (2012). Survey shows why projects fail. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2034616]Search in Google Scholar
[Gorakavi, P. K. (2009). Build Your Project Using Feature Driven Development. Retrieved from http://www.ipma-usa.org/articles/A4_AboutFDD.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Harvard Business Review (2011). Why your IT project may be riskier than you think, Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2011/09/why-your-it-project-may-be-riskier-than-you-think]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO (2012). ISO 21500:2012, Guidance on project management]Search in Google Scholar
[Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377–1392. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.00510.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). The impact of project methodologies on project success in different project environments. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(2), 364–388. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2015-002510.1108/IJMPB-03-2015-0025]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kononenko, I., Aghaee, A., & Lutsenko, S. (2016). Application of the Project Management Methodology Synthesis Method with fuzzy input data. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/3(80), 32–39. http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.6567110.15587/1729-4061.2016.65671]Search in Google Scholar
[Kononenko, I.V. & Lutsenko, S.Yu. (2017). Method for selection of project management approach based on fuzzy concepts. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management, 2(1224), 8–17. http://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2017.1224.210.20998/2413-3000.2017.1224.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kononenko, I.V. & Lutsenko, S.Yu. (2018a). Evolution of the generalized body of knowledge on project management. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic Management, Portfolio, Program and Project Management, 2(1225), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.20998/12451010.20998/124510]Search in Google Scholar
[Kononenko, I. & Lutsenko, S. (2018b). The Project Management Methodology and Guide Formation’s Method. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT) (pp. 156–159). Lviv, Ukraine. http://doi.org/10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.852662110.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526621]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kryvinska, N. (2012). Building Consistent Formal Specification for the Service Enterprise Agility Foundation. Journal of Service Science Research, 4(2), 235–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-012-0010-510.1007/s12927-012-0010-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[PricewaterhouseCoopers (2012). Insights and Trends: Current Portfolio, Programme, and Project Management Practices The third global survey on the current state of project management. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com.tr/en/publications/arastirmalar/pages/pwc-global-project-management-report-small.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Project Management Institute. (2017a). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)–Sixth Edition. New-town Square, PA: Project Management Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Project Management Institute. (2017b). Agile Practice Guide. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rehman, A., & Hussain, R (2007). Software project management methodologies/frameworks dynamics “A comparative approach”. Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Emerging Technologies (ICIET) (pp. 1–5). Karachi, Pakistan.10.1109/ICIET.2007.4381330]Search in Google Scholar
[SCRUMstudy (2016). A guide to the Scrum Body of Knowledge (SBOK Guide), 2016 Edition. SCRUMstudy, a brand of VMEdu, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona USA. 340 p. The Standish Group (2013). CHAOS Research Report 2013. Retrieved from https://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/GENREF/S130301C.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitaker, S. (2014). The Benefits of Tailoring: Making a Project Management Methodology Fit. PMI White Paper]Search in Google Scholar