Open Access

Application of the Project Management Methodology Formation’s Method


Cite

Agile Business Consortium (2014). The DSDM Agile Project Framework. Retrieved from https://www.agile-business.org/page/TheDSDMAgileProjectFrameworkSearch in Google Scholar

Anderson, D. J. (2010). Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business. Washington: Blue Hole Press.Search in Google Scholar

OGC (2017). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. London: TSO.Search in Google Scholar

Beck, K. (2004). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Second Edition. Addison-Wesley Professional.Search in Google Scholar

Boehm, B. & Turner, R. (2004). Balancing agility and discipline: evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods. Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2004.131750310.1109/ICSE.2004.1317503Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

IEEE (2014). Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK V3.0). IEEE Computer Society Press. 335 p.Search in Google Scholar

Bushuev, S. D., & Neizvestnyy, S. I. (2013). The project management methodologies genome as the universal knowledge model. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 14, 15–18.Search in Google Scholar

Conforto E., Salum F., Amaral D., et al. (2014). Can Agile Project Management Be Adopted by Industries Other than Software Development? Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.2141010.1002/pmj.21410Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Čelesnik, G., Radujković, M., & Vrečko, I. (2018). Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management. Organizacija, 51(4), 223-237. http://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-002310.2478/orga-2018-0023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gallup (2012). The cost of bad project management. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/business-journal/152429/cost-bad-project-management.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

Gartner (2012). Survey shows why projects fail. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2034616Search in Google Scholar

Gorakavi, P. K. (2009). Build Your Project Using Feature Driven Development. Retrieved from http://www.ipma-usa.org/articles/A4_AboutFDD.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Harvard Business Review (2011). Why your IT project may be riskier than you think, Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2011/09/why-your-it-project-may-be-riskier-than-you-thinkSearch in Google Scholar

ISO (2012). ISO 21500:2012, Guidance on project managementSearch in Google Scholar

Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377–1392. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.00510.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). The impact of project methodologies on project success in different project environments. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(2), 364–388. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2015-002510.1108/IJMPB-03-2015-0025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kononenko, I., Aghaee, A., & Lutsenko, S. (2016). Application of the Project Management Methodology Synthesis Method with fuzzy input data. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/3(80), 32–39. http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.6567110.15587/1729-4061.2016.65671Search in Google Scholar

Kononenko, I.V. & Lutsenko, S.Yu. (2017). Method for selection of project management approach based on fuzzy concepts. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management, 2(1224), 8–17. http://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2017.1224.210.20998/2413-3000.2017.1224.2Search in Google Scholar

Kononenko, I.V. & Lutsenko, S.Yu. (2018a). Evolution of the generalized body of knowledge on project management. Bulletin of NTU “KhPI”. Series: Strategic Management, Portfolio, Program and Project Management, 2(1225), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.20998/12451010.20998/124510Search in Google Scholar

Kononenko, I. & Lutsenko, S. (2018b). The Project Management Methodology and Guide Formation’s Method. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT) (pp. 156–159). Lviv, Ukraine. http://doi.org/10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.852662110.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526621Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kryvinska, N. (2012). Building Consistent Formal Specification for the Service Enterprise Agility Foundation. Journal of Service Science Research, 4(2), 235–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-012-0010-510.1007/s12927-012-0010-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

PricewaterhouseCoopers (2012). Insights and Trends: Current Portfolio, Programme, and Project Management Practices The third global survey on the current state of project management. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com.tr/en/publications/arastirmalar/pages/pwc-global-project-management-report-small.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Project Management Institute. (2017a). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)–Sixth Edition. New-town Square, PA: Project Management Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Project Management Institute. (2017b). Agile Practice Guide. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Rehman, A., & Hussain, R (2007). Software project management methodologies/frameworks dynamics “A comparative approach”. Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Emerging Technologies (ICIET) (pp. 1–5). Karachi, Pakistan.10.1109/ICIET.2007.4381330Search in Google Scholar

SCRUMstudy (2016). A guide to the Scrum Body of Knowledge (SBOK Guide), 2016 Edition. SCRUMstudy, a brand of VMEdu, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona USA. 340 p. The Standish Group (2013). CHAOS Research Report 2013. Retrieved from https://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/GENREF/S130301C.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Whitaker, S. (2014). The Benefits of Tailoring: Making a Project Management Methodology Fit. PMI White PaperSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1581-1832
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Business Management, Management, Organization, Corporate Governance