Calculated neutron energy dependence of the dose-response of large recombination chamber

1. Zielczyński, M., Golnik, N., & Rusinowski, Z. (1996). A computer controlled ambient dose equivalent meter based on a recombination chamber. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc. Equ., 370(2/3), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)01013-0.10.1016/0168-9002(95)01013-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Zielczyński, M., & Golnik, N. (1994). Recombination index of radiation quality – measuring and applications. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 52, 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082226.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082226Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Golnik, N., Gryziński, M. A., Kowalska, M., Meronka, K., & Tulik, P. (2014). Characterization of radiation field for irradiation of biological samples at nuclear reactor – comparison of twin detector and recombination methods. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 161(1/4), 196–200. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct341.10.1093/rpd/nct34124366246Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Golnik, N. (1996). Recombination methods in the dosimetry of mixed radiation. Swierk, Poland: Institute of Atomic Energy. (Report IEA-20/A).Search in Google Scholar

5. Golnik, N., Silari, M., & Otto, T. (1999). On the use of a recombination chamber for radiation measurements in CERN-EU high-energy reference radiation fields. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 86(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032940.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032940Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Silari, M., Agosteo, S., Beck, P., Bedogni, R., Cale, E., Caresana, M., Domingo, C., Donadille, L., Dubourg, N., Esposito, A., Fehrenbacher, G., Fernandez, F., Ferrarini, M., Fiechtner, A., Fuchs, A., Garcia, M. J., Golnik, N., Gutermuth, F., Khurana, S., Klages, Th., Latocha, M., Mares, V., Mayer, S., Radon, T., Reithmeier, H., Rollet, S., Roos, H., Ruhm, W., Sandri, S., Schardt, D., Simmer, G., Spurny, F., Trompier, F., Villa-Grassa, C., Weitzenegger, E., Wiegel, B., Wielunski, M., Wissmann, F., Zechner, A., & Zielczyński, M. (2009). Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response. Radiat. Meas., 44(7/8), 673–691. DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005.10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Golnik, N., Brede, H. J., & Guldbakke, S. (1997). H*(10) response of the REM-2 recombination chamber in monoenergetic neutron fields. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 74(3), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032189.10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032189Search in Google Scholar

8. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1983). Microdosimetry. ICRU Publications. Bethesda. (ICRU Report 36).Search in Google Scholar

9. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1993). Quantities and units in radiation protection dosimetry. ICRU Publications. Bethesda. (ICRU Report 51).Search in Google Scholar

10. Leuthold, G., Mares, V., & Schraube, H. (1992). Calculation of the neutron ambient dose equivalent on the basis of the ICRP revised quality factors. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 40(2), 77–84.Search in Google Scholar