This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Alexander, J. C. (Ed.). (1998). Real civil societies: Dilemmas of institutionalization. London: Sage.AlexanderJ. C.(Ed.)1998LondonSageSearch in Google Scholar
Alston, P. (2017). The populist challenge to human rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hux007AlstonP.2017The populist challenge to human rights91115https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hux00710.1093/jhuman/hux007Search in Google Scholar
Aslanidis, P. (2017). Populism and social movements. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 305–325). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001AslanidisP.2017Populism and social movementsInKaltwasserC. R.TaggartP. A.EspejoP. O.OstiguyP.(Eds.),305325OxfordOxford University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.000110.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Collins, H., Evans, R., Durant, D., & Weinel, M. (2020). Experts and the will of the people: Society, populism and science. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26983-8CollinsH.EvansR.DurantD.WeinelM.2020LondonPalgrave Macmillanhttp://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26983-810.1007/978-3-030-26983-8Search in Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty on European Union, The Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Related Acts. http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/ams/signCouncil of the European Union1997http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/ams/signSearch in Google Scholar
Datta, N. (2018). Restoring the natural order: The religious extremists’ vision to mobilise European societies against human rights on sexuality and reproduction. European Parliamentary Forum on Population & Development. https://www.epfweb.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/rtno_epf_book_lores.pdfDattaN.2018European Parliamentary Forum on Population & Developmenthttps://www.epfweb.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/rtno_epf_book_lores.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
de la Torre, C., & Mazzoleni, O. (2019). Do we need a minimum definition of populism? An appraisal of Mudde's conceptualisation. Populism, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-02011021de la TorreC.MazzoleniO.2019Do we need a minimum definition of populism? An appraisal of Mudde's conceptualisation11112https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-0201102110.1163/25888072-02011021Search in Google Scholar
European Union. (2012). Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union. Official journal, C326/115. http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/teu_2012/ojEuropean Union2012Consolidated version of the Treaty on European UnionC326115http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/teu_2012/ojSearch in Google Scholar
Grote, J. (2019). Civil society and the European Union: From enthusiasm to disenchantment. https://doc-research.org/2019/11/civil-society-european-union-enthusiasm/GroteJ.2019https://doc-research.org/2019/11/civil-society-european-union-enthusiasm/10.1515/fjsb-2019-0060Search in Google Scholar
Gøtzsche-Astrup, J. (2019). Civil society and its outside: Analysing the boundary between civil and uncivil society in the Danish anti-radicalisation discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 15(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2019.1595382Gøtzsche-AstrupJ.2019Civil society and its outside: Analysing the boundary between civil and uncivil society in the Danish anti-radicalisation discourse152162177https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2019.159538210.1080/17448689.2019.1595382Search in Google Scholar
Kalm, S., & Meeuwisse, A. (2020). For love and for life: Emotional dynamics at the World Congress of Families. Global Discourse, 10, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1332/204378920X15784019972237KalmS.MeeuwisseA.2020For love and for life: Emotional dynamics at the World Congress of Families10303320https://doi.org/10.1332/204378920X1578401997223710.1332/204378920X15784019972237Search in Google Scholar
Krzyżanowska, N., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2018). ‘Crisis’ and migration in Poland: Discursive shifts, anti-pluralism and the politicisation of exclusion. Sociology, 52(3), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038518757952KrzyżanowskaN.KrzyżanowskiM.2018‘Crisis’ and migration in Poland: Discursive shifts, anti-pluralism and the politicisation of exclusion523612618https://doi.org/10.1177%2F003803851875795210.1177/0038038518757952Search in Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, M., & Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the web populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 566–581. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krzKrzyzanowskiM.LedinP.2017Uncivility on the web populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion164566581https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz10.1075/jlp.17028.krzSearch in Google Scholar
Majtényi, B., Kopper, Á., & Susánszky, P. (2019). Constitutional othering, ambiguity and subjective risks of mobilisation in Hungary: Examples from the migration crisis. Democratization, 26(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1493051MajtényiB.KopperÁ.SusánszkyP.2019Constitutional othering, ambiguity and subjective risks of mobilisation in Hungary: Examples from the migration crisis262173189https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.149305110.1080/13510347.2018.1493051Search in Google Scholar
Matthes, J. (2009). What's a frame? A contents analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals 1990–2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F107769900908600206MatthesJ.2009What's a frame? A contents analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals 1990–2005862349367https://doi.org/10.1177%2F10776990090860020610.1177/107769900908600206Search in Google Scholar
Ruzza, C. (2010). Identifying uncivil society in Europe: Towards a ‘new politics of the enemy’? In U. Liebert, & H.-J. Trenz (Eds.), The new politics of European civil society (pp. 143–162). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836682RuzzaC.2010Identifying uncivil society in Europe: Towards a ‘new politics of the enemy’?InLiebertU.TrenzH.-J.(Eds.),143162LondonRoutledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/978020383668210.4324/9780203836682Search in Google Scholar
Ruzza, C. (2015). Changes in the field of EU civil society organizations: Institutionalisation, differentiation and challengers. In H. Johansson, & S. Kalm (Eds.), EU civil society: Patterns of cooperation, competition and conflict (pp. 23–42). London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500724RuzzaC.2015Changes in the field of EU civil society organizations: Institutionalisation, differentiation and challengersInJohanssonH.KalmS.(Eds.),2342LondonPalgravehttps://doi.org/10.1057/978113750072410.1057/9781137500724Search in Google Scholar
Saurugger, S. (2016). Democratic ‘misfit’? Conceptions of civil society participation in France and the European Union. Political Studies, 55(2), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.2007.00662.xSauruggerS.2016Democratic ‘misfit’? Conceptions of civil society participation in France and the European Union552384404https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.2007.00662.x10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00662.xSearch in Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford: Osford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001SawardM.2010OxfordOsford University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Titley, G. (2014). After the end of multiculturalism: Public service media and integrationist imaginaries for the governance of difference. Global Media and Communication, 10(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1742766514552351TitleyG.2014After the end of multiculturalism: Public service media and integrationist imaginaries for the governance of difference103247260https://doi.org/10.1177%2F174276651455235110.1177/1742766514552351Search in Google Scholar
Van Dyck, B. (2019). Why not anti-populist parties? Theory with evidence from the Andes and Thailand. Comparative Politics, 51(3), 361–388.Van DyckB.2019Why not anti-populist parties? Theory with evidence from the Andes and Thailand51336138810.5129/001041519X15647434970009Search in Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2017). Doing politics’ in the European Parliament. In G. Clemens (Ed.), The quest for Europeanization: Interdisciplinary perspectives on a multiple process (pp. 187–206). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.WodakR.2017Doing politics’ in the European ParliamentInClemensG.(Ed.),187206StuttgartFranz Steiner VerlagSearch in Google Scholar
Agenda Europe. (2021). Agenda Europe. [blog]. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://agendaeurope.wordpress.comAgenda Europe2021[blog]. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://agendaeurope.wordpress.comSearch in Google Scholar
European Roma Grassroots Organizations. (2021). ERGO. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://www.mediavoice.eu/en/soho_portfolio/ergo/European Roma Grassroots Organizations2021Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://www.mediavoice.eu/en/soho_portfolio/ergo/Search in Google Scholar
European Women's Lobby. (2021). European women's lobby: Together for a feminist Europe. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://womenlobby.org/?lang=enEuropean Women's Lobby2021Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://womenlobby.org/?lang=enSearch in Google Scholar
FEMYSO. (2018, November 30). CDDH: Protection and promotion of the civil society space in Europe. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://femyso.org/cddh-protection-and-promotion-of-the-civil-society-space-in-europe/FEMYSO2018November30Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://femyso.org/cddh-protection-and-promotion-of-the-civil-society-space-in-europe/Search in Google Scholar
International Lesbian and Gay Association. (2021). ILGA-Europe. Retrieved January 21, 2021, https://www.ilga-europe.orgInternational Lesbian and Gay Association2021Retrieved January 21, 2021, https://www.ilga-europe.orgSearch in Google Scholar
Observatory on Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians in Europe. (2021). About us. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://www.intoleranceagainstchristians.eu/about-us/#aboutUsObservatory on Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians in Europe2021Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://www.intoleranceagainstchristians.eu/about-us/#aboutUsSearch in Google Scholar
Ordo Iuris. (2019, November 13). A stand for the defence of life and family at the United Nations forum: Ordo Iuris is participating in the Nairobi Summit. http://en.ordoiuris.pl/life-protection/stand-defence-life-and-family-united-nations-forum-ordo-iuris-participating-nairobiOrdo Iuris2019November13http://en.ordoiuris.pl/life-protection/stand-defence-life-and-family-united-nations-forum-ordo-iuris-participating-nairobiSearch in Google Scholar
Ordo Iuris. (2021). International Activity. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from http://en.ordoiuris.pl/international-activityOrdo Iuris2021Retrieved January 21, 2021, from http://en.ordoiuris.pl/international-activitySearch in Google Scholar