This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Althaus, S. L. (2006). False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443651AlthausS. L.2006False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research181–375104https://doi.org/10.1080/0891381060844365110.1080/08913810608443651Search in Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.ArceneauxK.JohnsonM.2013ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press10.7208/chicago/9780226047447.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2015). More a symptom than a cause: Polarization and partisan news media in America. In J. A. Thurber, & A. Yoshinaka (Eds.), American Gridlock: The sources, character, and impact of political polarization (pp. 309–336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316287002.016ArceneauxK.JohnsonM.2015More a symptom than a cause: Polarization and partisan news media in AmericaInThurberJ. A.YoshinakaA.(Eds.),309336CambridgeCambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316287002.01610.1017/CBO9781316287002.016Search in Google Scholar
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160BakshyE.MessingS.AdamicL. A.2015Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook348623911301132https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa116010.1126/science.aaa1160Search in Google Scholar
Barberá, P. (2015, September 3–6). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. [Conference presentation]. Annual Meeting of the 2015 American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California. http://pablobarbera.com/static/barbera_polarization_APSA.pdfBarberáP.2015September3–6[Conference presentation]. Annual Meeting of the 2015 American Political Science AssociationSan Francisco, Californiahttp://pablobarbera.com/static/barbera_polarization_APSA.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Beam, M. A. (2014). Automating the news: How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception. Communication Research, 41(8), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213497979BeamM. A.2014Automating the news: How personalized news recommender system design choices impact news reception41810191041https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021349797910.1177/0093650213497979Search in Google Scholar
Beam, M. A., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 940–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783BeamM. A.HutchensM. J.HmielowskiJ. D.2018Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election217940958https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.144478310.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783Search in Google Scholar
Bos, L., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Nation binding: How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0155112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155112BosL.KruikemeierS.de VreeseC. H.2016Nation binding: How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure115e0155112https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.015511210.1371/journal.pone.0155112Search in Google Scholar
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), 10612–10617. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706588114BoxellL.GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M.2017Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups114401061210617https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170658811410.1073/pnas.1706588114Search in Google Scholar
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization (No. w26669). Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26669BoxellL.GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M.2020Cambridge, MassachusettsNational Bureau of Economic Researchhttps://doi.org/10.3386/w2666910.3386/w26669Search in Google Scholar
Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology, 17, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-yBozdagE.van den HovenJ.2015Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design17249265https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y10.1007/s10676-015-9380-ySearch in Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2019a). Are filter bubbles real? Oxford: Polity Press.BrunsA.2019aOxfordPolity PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2019b). Filter bubble. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426BrunsA.2019bFilter bubble84114https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.142610.14763/2019.4.1426Search in Google Scholar
Chitra, U., & Musco, C. (2020). Analyzing the impact of filter bubbles on social network polarization. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 115–123). Houston, Texas: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3336191.3371825ChitraU.MuscoC.2020Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining115123Houston, TexasAssociation for Computing Machineryhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3336191.337182510.1145/3336191.3371825Search in Google Scholar
Choi, J., & Lee, J. K. (2015). Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.029ChoiJ.LeeJ. K.2015Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity44258266https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.02910.1016/j.chb.2014.11.029Search in Google Scholar
Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011, July 17–21). Political polarization on Twitter [Conference presentation]. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2847/3275ConoverM. D.RatkiewiczJ.FranciscoM.GoncalvesB.MenczerF.FlamminiA.2011July17–21[Conference presentation]. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social MediaBarcelona, Spainhttps://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2847/3275Search in Google Scholar
Cotton, J. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillmann, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11–33). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CottonJ. L.1985Cognitive dissonance in selective exposureInZillmannD.BryantJ.(Eds.),1133Hillsdale, New JerseyLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesSearch in Google Scholar
Cowan, S. K., & Baldassarri, D. (2018). “It could turn ugly”: Selective disclosure of attitudes in political discussion networks. Social Networks, 52, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.04.002CowanS. K.BaldassarriD.2018“It could turn ugly”: Selective disclosure of attitudes in political discussion networks52117https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.04.00210.1016/j.socnet.2017.04.002Search in Google Scholar
Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3CrockettM. J.2017Moral outrage in the digital age1769771https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-310.1038/s41562-017-0213-3Search in Google Scholar
D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2006). The selective exposure hypothesis and media choice processes. In R. W. Preiss (Ed.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 103–118). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.D’AlessioD.AllenM.2006The selective exposure hypothesis and media choice processesInPreissR. W.(Ed.),103118Mahwah, New JerseyLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesSearch in Google Scholar
Davies, H. C. (2018). Redefining filter bubbles as (escapable) socio-technical recursion. Sociological Research Online, 23(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418763824DaviesH. C.2018Redefining filter bubbles as (escapable) socio-technical recursion233637654https://doi.org/10.1177/136078041876382410.1177/1360780418763824Search in Google Scholar
Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656DuboisE.BlankG.2018The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media215117https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.142865610.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656Search in Google Scholar
Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2016). The political environment on social media. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. https://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/DugganM.SmithA.2016Washington, D.C.Pew Research Centerhttps://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/Search in Google Scholar
Erasmus, D., & Barker, W. W. (2001). The adages of Erasmus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.ErasmusD.BarkerW. W.2001TorontoUniversity of Toronto PressSearch in Google Scholar
Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and heterogeneity of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.xEvelandW. P.Jr.HivelyM. H.2009Political discussion frequency, network size, and heterogeneity of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation592205224https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fischer, P., Lea, S., Kastenmüller, A., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, J., & Frey, D. (2011). The process of selective exposure: Why confirmatory information search weakens over time. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 114(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.09.001FischerP.LeaS.KastenmüllerA.GreitemeyerT.FischerJ.FreyD.2011The process of selective exposure: Why confirmatory information search weakens over time11413748https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.09.00110.1016/j.obhdp.2010.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006FlaxmanS.GoelS.RaoJ. M.2016Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption80S1298320https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw00610.1093/poq/nfw006Search in Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017a). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315FletcherR.NielsenR. K.2017aAre news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication674476498https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1231510.1111/jcom.12315Search in Google Scholar
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017b). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170FletcherR.NielsenR. K.2017bAre people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis20724502468https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481772417010.1177/1461444817724170Search in Google Scholar
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol.19, pp. 41–80). San Diego, California: Academic Press.FreyD.1986Recent research on selective exposure to informationInBerkowitzL.(Ed.),194180San Diego, CaliforniaAcademic Press10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60212-9Search in Google Scholar
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.xGarrettR. K.2009Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate594676699https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.xSearch in Google Scholar
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M.2011Ideological segregation online and offline126417991839https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr04410.3386/w15916Search in Google Scholar
Graham, G. (2017). Behaviorism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/behaviorism/GrahamG.2017BehaviorismInZaltaE. N.(Ed.),Spring2017 ed.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/behaviorism/Search in Google Scholar
Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-xGuessA. M.NyhanB.ReiflerJ.2020Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election4472480https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x10.1038/s41562-020-0833-xSearch in Google Scholar
Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695HanitzschT.Van DalenA.SteindlN.2018Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press231323https://doi.org/10.1177/194016121774069510.1177/1940161217740695Search in Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Preferences. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/preferences/HanssonS. O.Grüne-YanoffT.2012PreferencesInZaltaE. N.(Ed.),Winter2012 ed.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/preferences/Search in Google Scholar
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701HartW.AlbarracínD.EaglyA. H.BrechanI.LindbergM. J.MerrillL.2009Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information1354555588https://doi.org/10.1037/a001570110.1037/a0015701Search in Google Scholar
Hart, W., Richardson, K., Tortoriello, G. K., & Earl, A. (2019). “You are what you read:” Is selective exposure a way people tell us who they are? British Journal of Psychology, 111(3), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12414HartW.RichardsonK.TortorielloG. K.EarlA.2019“You are what you read:” Is selective exposure a way people tell us who they are?1113417442https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.1241410.1111/bjop.12414Search in Google Scholar
Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1016-yHillR. A.DunbarR. I. M.2003Social network size in humans1415372https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y10.1007/s12110-003-1016-ySearch in Google Scholar
Jensen, K. B., & Rosengren, K. E. (1990). Five traditions in search of the audience. European Journal of Communication, 5, 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323190005002005JensenK. B.RosengrenK. E.1990Five traditions in search of the audience5207238https://doi.org/10.1177/026732319000500200510.4135/9780857024374.d9Search in Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Landrum, A., Carpenter, K., Helft, L., & Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Science curiosity and political information processing. Political Psychology, 38, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12396KahanD. M.LandrumA.CarpenterK.HelftL.JamiesonK. H.2017Science curiosity and political information processing38179199https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.1239610.1111/pops.12396Search in Google Scholar
Kearney, M. W. (2019). Analyzing change in network polarization. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1380–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818822813KearneyM. W.2019Analyzing change in network polarization21613801402https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481882281310.1177/1461444818822813Search in Google Scholar
Kim, M.-S., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, part 2. Communication Research, 20(3), 331–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003001KimM.-S.HunterJ. E.1993Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, part 2203331364https://doi.org/10.1177/00936509302000300110.1177/009365093020003001Search in Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771359Knobloch-WesterwickS.2014New YorkRoutledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/978131577135910.4324/9781315771359Search in Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1999). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical papers volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621123LakatosI.1999Philosophical papers volume 1.CambridgeCambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051162112310.1017/CBO9780511621123Search in Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB.GaudetH.1948New YorkColumbia University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12077LeeJ. K.ChoiJ.KimC.KimY.2014Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization644702722https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1207710.1111/jcom.12077Search in Google Scholar
Malinas, G., & Bigelow, J. (2016). Simpson's paradox. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/paradox-simpson/MalinasG.BigelowJ.2016Simpson's paradoxInZaltaE. N.(Ed.),Fall2016 ed.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/paradox-simpson/10.5840/monist200184217Search in Google Scholar
Matsa, K. E., Silver, L., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2018, October). A minority in all eight countries say the news they see on social media reflects their own political views. Pew Research Center's journalism project. https://www.journalism.org/2018/10/30/younger-europeans-are-far-more-likely-to-get-news-from-social-media/pj_2018-10-30_europe-age_0-08/MatsaK. E.SilverL.ShearerE.WalkerM.2018OctoberA minority in all eight countries say the news they see on social media reflects their own political viewshttps://www.journalism.org/2018/10/30/younger-europeans-are-far-more-likely-to-get-news-from-social-media/pj_2018-10-30_europe-age_0-08/Search in Google Scholar
Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406MessingS.WestwoodS. J.2014Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online41810421063https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021246640610.1177/0093650212466406Search in Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761515MondakJ. J.2010New YorkCambridge University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051176151510.1017/CBO9780511761515Search in Google Scholar
Munson, S. A., & Resnick, P. (2010). Presenting diverse political opinions: How and how much. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1457–1466). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753543MunsonS. A.ResnickP.2010Presenting diverse political opinions: How and how much14571466New YorkACMhttps://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.175354310.1145/1753326.1753543Search in Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.xMutzD. C.MondakJ. J.2006The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse681140155https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.xSearch in Google Scholar
Möller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & van Es, B. (2018). Do not blame it on the algorithm: An empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076MöllerJ.TrillingD.HelbergerN.van EsB.2018Do not blame it on the algorithm: An empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity217959977https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.144407610.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076Search in Google Scholar
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf.NegroponteN.1995New YorkKnopfSearch in Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314NelsonJ. L.WebsterJ. G.2017The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience33113https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511772931410.1177/2056305117729314Search in Google Scholar
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute digital news report 2017. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.NewmanN.FletcherR.KalogeropoulosA.LevyD. A. L.NielsenR. K.2017OxfordReuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of OxfordSearch in Google Scholar
Newton, C. (2016, November 16). The author of The Filter Bubble on how fake news is eroding trust in journalism. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/11/16/13653026/filter-bubble-facebook-election-eli-pariser-interviewNewtonC.2016November16The author of The Filter Bubble on how fake news is eroding trust in journalismhttps://www.theverge.com/2016/11/16/13653026/filter-bubble-facebook-election-eli-pariser-interviewSearch in Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.PariserE.2011New YorkPenguin PressSearch in Google Scholar
Perry, D. K. (1988). Implications of a contextualist approach to media-effects research. Communication Research, 15(3), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015003002PerryD. K.1988Implications of a contextualist approach to media-effects research153246264https://doi.org/10.1177/00936508801500300210.1177/009365088015003002Search in Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242PriorM.2013Media and political polarization161101127https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-13524210.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242Search in Google Scholar
Settanni, M., Azucar, D., & Marengo, D. (2018). Predicting individual characteristics from digital traces on social media: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(4), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0384SettanniM.AzucarD.MarengoD.2018Predicting individual characteristics from digital traces on social media: A meta-analysis214217228https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.038410.1089/cyber.2017.0384Search in Google Scholar
Shackel, N. (2005). The vacuity of postmodernist methodology. Metaphilosophy, 36(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00370.xShackelN.2005The vacuity of postmodernist methodology363295320https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00370.x10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00370.xSearch in Google Scholar
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., & Lin, J.-H. T. (2018). What predicts selective avoidance on social media? A study of political unfriending in Hong Kong and Taiwan. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(8), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218764251SkoricM. M.ZhuQ.LinJ.-H. T.2018What predicts selective avoidance on social media? A study of political unfriending in Hong Kong and Taiwan62810971115https://doi.org/10.1177/000276421876425110.1177/0002764218764251Search in Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. (2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 464–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.xSmithS. M.FabrigarL. R.NorrisM. E.2008Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities21464493https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.x10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.xSearch in Google Scholar
Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.xStroudN. J.2010Polarization and partisan selective exposure603556576https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.SunsteinC. R.2001Princeton, New JerseyPrinceton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Sülflow, M., Schäfer, S., & Winter, S. (2018). Selective attention in the news feed: An eye-tracking study on the perception and selection of political news posts on Facebook. New Media & Society, 21(1), 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818791520SülflowM.SchäferS.WinterS.2018Selective attention in the news feed: An eye-tracking study on the perception and selection of political news posts on Facebook211168190https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481879152010.1177/1461444818791520Search in Google Scholar
The Daily Dish. (2010, October). The filter bubble. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2010/10/the-filter-bubble/181427/The Daily Dish2010OctoberThe filter bubblehttps://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2010/10/the-filter-bubble/181427/Search in Google Scholar
Trilling, D., Klingeren, M. van, & Tsfati, Y. (2017). Selective exposure, political polarization, and possible mediators: Evidence from the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw003TrillingD.KlingerenM. vanTsfatiY.2017Selective exposure, political polarization, and possible mediators: Evidence from the Netherlands292189213https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw00310.1093/ijpor/edw003Search in Google Scholar
Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H. G., Strömbäck, J., Vliegenthart, R., Damstra, A., & Lindgren, E. (2020). Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: Literature review and synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1759443TsfatiY.BoomgaardenH. G.StrömbäckJ.VliegenthartR.DamstraA.LindgrenE.2020Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: Literature review and synthesis442157173https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.175944310.1080/23808985.2020.1759443Search in Google Scholar
Urman, A. (2019). Context matters: Political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541UrmanA.2019Context matters: Political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective426857879https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371987654110.1177/0163443719876541Search in Google Scholar
Vinnova. (2017, October 26). Unikt samarbete ska motverka falska nyheter inför valet [A unique collaboration will counteract fake news prior to the election]. [press release]. Vinnova. https://www.vinnova.se/nyheter/2017/10/unikt-samarbete-ska-motverka-falska-nyheter-infor-valet/Vinnova2017October26Unikt samarbete ska motverka falska nyheter inför valet [A unique collaboration will counteract fake news prior to the election]. [press release]https://www.vinnova.se/nyheter/2017/10/unikt-samarbete-ska-motverka-falska-nyheter-infor-valet/Search in Google Scholar
Vraga, E., Bode, L., & Troller-Renfree, S. (2016). Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150443VragaE.BodeL.Troller-RenfreeS.2016Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content102–3149164https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.115044310.1080/19312458.2016.1150443Search in Google Scholar
Webster, J. G. (2017). Three myths of digital media. Convergence, 23(4), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517700385WebsterJ. G.2017Three myths of digital media234352361https://doi.org/10.1177/135485651770038510.1177/1354856517700385Search in Google Scholar
Weeks, B. E., Ksiazek, T. B., & Holbert, R. L. (2016). Partisan enclaves or shared media experiences? A network approach to understanding citizens’ political news environments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1164170WeeksB. E.KsiazekT. B.HolbertR. L.2016Partisan enclaves or shared media experiences? A network approach to understanding citizens’ political news environments602248268https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.116417010.1080/08838151.2016.1164170Search in Google Scholar
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Trilling, D., Möller, J., Bodó, B., de Vreese, C. H., & Helberger, N. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.401Zuiderveen BorgesiusF. J.TrillingD.MöllerJ.BodóB.de VreeseC. H.HelbergerN.2016Should we worry about filter bubbles?51https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.40110.14763/2016.1.401Search in Google Scholar