Issue Salience on Twitter During Swedish Party Leaders’ Debates

Aizawa, A. (2003). An information-theoretic perspective of tf–idf measures. Information Processing & Management, 39(1): 45–65.AizawaA.2003An information-theoretic perspective of tf–idf measuresInformation Processing & Management391456510.1016/S0306-4573(02)00021-3Search in Google Scholar

Aylott, N. (2015) The party system. In J. Pierre (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Swedish politics (pp. 152–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.AylottN.2015The party systemPierreJ.The Oxford handbook of Swedish politics152168OxfordOxford University Press10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199665679.013.9Search in Google Scholar

Boynton, G. R. & Richardson Jr, G. W. (2016). Agenda setting in the twenty-first century. New Media & Society, 18(9): 1916–1934.BoyntonG. R.&Richardson JrG. W.2016Agenda setting in the twenty-first centuryNew Media & Society1891916193410.1177/1461444815616226Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. (2011). # ausvotes: How twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 37–56.BrunsA.&BurgessJ.2011# ausvotes: How twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal electionCommunication, Politics & Culture4423756Search in Google Scholar

Caiani, M & Parenti, L. (2013) European and American extreme right groups and the Internet Surrey: Ashgate.CaianiM&ParentiL.2013European and American extreme right groups and the InternetSurreyAshgateSearch in Google Scholar

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.ChadwickA.2017The hybrid media system: Politics and powerNew YorkOxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chadwick, A., O’Loughlin, B. & Vaccari, C. (2017). Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2): 220–239.ChadwickA.O’LoughlinB.&VaccariC.2017Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagementJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61222023910.1080/08838151.2017.1309415Search in Google Scholar

Dijck, J. & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1): 2–14.DijckJ.&PoellT.2013Understanding social media logicMedia and Communication1121410.12924/mac2013.01010002Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3): 529–547.GibsonR. K.&McAllisterI.2015Normalising or equalising party competition?Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies633529547Search in Google Scholar

Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8): 965–989.HoogheL.MarksG.&WilsonC. J.2002Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35896598910.1017/CBO9780511492013.008Search in Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society Princeton: Princeton University Press.InglehartR.1990Culture shift in advanced industrial societyPrincetonPrinceton University Press10.1515/9780691186740Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, K. & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities New York: Palgrave MacMillan.JacobsK.&SpieringsN.2016Social media, parties, and political inequalitiesNew YorkPalgrave MacMillan10.1057/9781137533906Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, B. (2017). Medievalrörelsen 2014. Invandringsfrågan i fokus för balanserad bevakning [The media election campaign 2014. The immigration issue in focus of balanced coverage]. In B. Johansson & L. Truedson (eds.), När makten står på spel: journalistik i valrörelser (pp. 22–57). Stockholm: Institutet för Mediestudier.JohanssonB.2017Medievalrörelsen 2014. Invandringsfrågan i fokus för balanserad bevakning [The media election campaign 2014. The immigration issue in focus of balanced coverage]JohanssonB.&TruedsonL.När makten står på spel: journalistik i valrörelser2257StockholmInstitutet för MediestudierSearch in Google Scholar

Jungherr, A. (2014). The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication, 64, 239–259. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087JungherrA.2014The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and contentJournal of Communication64239259http://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1208710.1111/jcom.12087Search in Google Scholar

Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1): 72–91.JungherrA.2016Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Information Technology & Politics131729110.1080/19331681.2015.1132401Search in Google Scholar

Jungherr, A., Schoen, H. & Jürgens, P. (2015). The mediation of politics through Twitter: An analysis of messages posted during the campaign for the German federal election 2013. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12143JungherrA.SchoenH.&JürgensP.2015The mediation of politics through Twitter: An analysis of messages posted during the campaign for the German federal election 2013Journal of Computer-Mediated Communicationhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.1214310.1111/jcc4.12143Search in Google Scholar

Kalsnes, B., Krumsvik, A. H. & Storsul, T. (2014). Social media as a political backchannel: Twitter use during televised election debates in Norway. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3): 313–328.KalsnesB.KrumsvikA. H.&StorsulT.2014Social media as a political backchannel: Twitter use during televised election debates in NorwayAslib Journal of Information Management66331332810.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0093Search in Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.KitscheltH.1994The transformation of European social democracyCambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511622014Search in Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.KitscheltH.1995The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysisAnn ArborUniversity of Michigan Press10.3998/mpub.14501Search in Google Scholar

Koc-Michalska, K., Gibson, R. & Vedel, T. (2014). Online campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political actors and citizens in the aftermath of the web.2.0 evolution Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11, 220–244.Koc-MichalskaK.GibsonR.&VedelT.2014Online campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political actors and citizens in the aftermath of the web.2.0 evolutionJournal of Information Technology & Politics1122024410.1080/19331681.2014.903217Search in Google Scholar

Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.KriesiH.GrandeE.LachatR.DolezalM.BornschierS.&FreyT.2008West European politics in the age of globalizationCambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511790720Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, A. O. & Moe, H. (2015). From emerging to established? A comparison of Twitter use during Swedish election campaigns in 2010 and 2014. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A.O. Larsson & C. Christensen (eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 311–324). London: Routledge.LarssonA. O.&MoeH.2015From emerging to established? A comparison of Twitter use during Swedish election campaigns in 2010 and 2014BrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA.O.&ChristensenC.The Routledge companion to social media and politics311324LondonRoutledge10.4324/9781315716299-23Search in Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries New Haven: Yale University Press.LijphartA.1999Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countriesNew HavenYale University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives New York: Free Press.LipsetS. M.&RokkanS.1967Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introductionM. LipsetS.&RokkanS.Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectivesNew YorkFree PressSearch in Google Scholar

McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.McCombsM.2014Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd edn.)Cambridge, UKPolity10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.48Search in Google Scholar

McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2): 176–187.McCombsM. E.&ShawD. L.1972The agenda-setting function of mass mediaPublic Opinion Quarterly36217618710.1086/267990Search in Google Scholar

McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L. & Weaver, D. H., (2014). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6): 781–802.McCombsM. E.ShawD. L.&WeaverD. H.2014New directions in agenda-setting theory and researchMass Communication and Society17678180210.4324/9781315164441-9Search in Google Scholar

Martinsson, J. & Weissenbilder, M. (2018) Viktiga valfrågor i Sverige – från miljö till invandring [Important election issues in Sweden – from environment to immigration]. In U. Andersson, A. Carlander, E. Lindgren & M. Oskarson (eds.), Sprickor i fasaden (pp. 119–132 ). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg/The SOM institute.MartinssonJ.&WeissenbilderM.2018Viktiga valfrågor i Sverige – från miljö till invandring [Important election issues in Sweden – from environment to immigration]AnderssonU.CarlanderA.LindgrenE.&OskarsonM.Sprickor i fasaden119132GothenburgUniversity of Gothenburg/The SOM instituteSearch in Google Scholar

Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H. & Carley, K. M. (2013). Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehose. Retrieved from: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1306.5204M [accessed 2018, September 17].MorstatterF.PfefferJ.LiuH.&CarleyK. M.2013Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehoseRetrieved fromhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1306.5204Maccessed 2018, September 17Search in Google Scholar

Obholzer, L. & Daniel, W. T. (2016). An online electoral connection? How electoral systems condition representatives’ social media use. European Union Politics, 17(3): 387–407.ObholzerL.&DanielW. T.2016An online electoral connection?How electoral systems condition representatives’ social media use. European Union Politics173387407Search in Google Scholar

Park, S., Ko, M., Lee, J. & Song, J. (2013). Agenda diversity in social media discourse: A study of the 2012 Korean general election. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media Boston, Massachusetts, 8–11 July 2013. (pp. 486–495).ParkS.KoM.LeeJ.&SongJ.2013Agenda diversity in social media discourse: A study of the 2012 Korean general electionProceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social MediaBoston, Massachusetts811July2013486495Search in Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, G., Prothro, J. W. & Jacoby, W. (1982). Salience as a factor in the impact of issues on candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics, 44(1): 41–63.RabinowitzG.ProthroJ. W.&JacobyW.1982Salience as a factor in the impact of issues on candidate evaluationJournal of Politics441416310.2307/2130283Search in Google Scholar

Rogstad, I. (2016). Is Twitter just rehashing? Intermedia agenda setting between Twitter and mainstream media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2): 142–158.RogstadI.2016Is Twitter just rehashing?Intermedia agenda setting between Twitter and mainstream media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics132142158Search in Google Scholar

Sandberg, L. & Bjereld, U. (2015). Politiskt deltagande och engagemang i en digital kontext [Political participation and engaement in a digital context]. In A. Bergström, B. Johansson, H. Oscarsson & M. Oskarson (eds.), Fragment (pp. 523–534 ). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg/The SOM institute.SandbergL.&BjereldU.2015Politiskt deltagande och engagemang i en digital kontext [Political participation and engaement in a digital context]BergströmA.JohanssonB.OscarssonH.&OskarsonM.Fragment523534GothenburgUniversity of Gothenburg/The SOM instituteSearch in Google Scholar

Trilling, D. (2015). Two different debates? Investigating the relationship between a political debate on TV and simultaneous comments on Twitter. Social Science Computer Review doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314537886TrillingD.2015Two different debates? Investigating the relationship between a political debate on TV and simultaneous comments on TwitterSocial Science Computer Reviewhttps://doi.org/10.1177/089443931453788610.1177/0894439314537886Search in Google Scholar

Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A. & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6): 1041–1061.VaccariC.ChadwickA.&O’LoughlinB.2015Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagementJournal of Communication6561041106110.1111/jcom.12187Search in Google Scholar

Vergeer, M. & Franses, P. H. (2016). Live audience responses to live televised election debates: Time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10): 1390–1410.VergeerM.&FransesP. H.2016Live audience responses to live televised election debates: Time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behaviorInformation, Communication & Society19101390141010.1080/1369118X.2015.1093526Search in Google Scholar

Wlezien, C. (2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’. Electoral Studies, 24(4), 555–579.WlezienC.2005On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’Electoral Studies24455557910.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009Search in Google Scholar