Open Access

“Shaming the Devil!”: Performative Shame in Investigative TV-journalism


Cite

Examples of Shaming in Episodes of Uppdrag granskning

Shaming Example
Those responsible are made to face the negative conditions they have created. Local politicians in Malmö are escorted to unfit lodgings for immigrants and faced with the heinous living conditions for which they are responsible, and meet the people who suffer from them – UG 020507
The filming of individuals responsible who refuse to be interviewed or are in any other way trying to evade being held accountable. A CEO responsible for negligence in face of reports of the danger of asbestos at his factory is filmed at a distance when standing on his balcony in Spain after the team has tried unsuccessfully to get an interview. During the footage the speaker relates his luxurious tastes. UG 010418
Introduction of footage from popular culture is used to amplify any of the shame generating factors. A scene portraying ridiculous policemen failing to solve an obvious case in an episode of “Pippi Longstocking” illustrates police inadequacy in solving crime in their own facilities. UG 110831
Actions are compared with someone doing it better.Actions are associated with something negative. Omissions to check potable water and to inform citizens are compared to how much better the Danish authorities handle similar situations. UG 021217The immigration policy of the Social Democrats is shown to be similar to that of the former anti-immigration party Ny Demokrati (The New Democrats) UG 020219
Symbolic visual representations are used to amplify any of the shame generating factors. To illustrate the Swedish Church’s possession of stocks in the porn and the weapons industry, a cut from a porn movie is voiced over by the slogan from the Church’s ad-campaign “Are you looking in the right place? The Swedish Church!” and a cut from a youth Church choir is cross-cut with footage of fired missiles and wounded children. UG 011127
Hidden Camera directly exposing wrongdoing A head-master of a private school explains why he actively sifts out children he considers a social liability. UG 131030
Cross-cutting between what the person says officially or on camera, and the “truth” as revealed by hidden camera or by witnesses. Politicians expressing their official stand on immigration are cross-cut with their racist slur before a hidden camera. UG 020910
The person’s statements are cross-cut with other seemingly contradicting statements. An interview with a representative of a pharma-ceutical company is cross cut with a radio interview in which he contradicts himself. UG 011009
The camera lingers as the person desperately tries, but fails, to find evidence of what they have said is correct A Social Worker desperately trying to find reference to an expert statement on which she has based a decision to take child custody from handicapped parents. UG 021210
The journalist uses a judgmental vocabulary. A politician trying to explain the disastrous housing situation in Stockholm is interrupted with: “Bla, bla, bla – what you say is baloney, you are just talking – but you are doing nothing”. UG 020319
The interview starts out in expert mode – but changes into an interview of accountability. A politician is commenting on the shortcomings of a political rival – half way through she is confronted with her party’s support of that politician on the very issue she is criticizing. UG 050308
eISSN:
2001-5119
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Communication Science, Mass Communication, Public and Political Communication