[Asp, Kent (2007) ‘Fairness, Informativeness and Scrutiny. The Role of News Media in Democracy’, NordicomReview, Jubilee Issue 2007: 31-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bächtiger, A., Susumu, S., Seraina P. & Ryser, M. (2011) Measuring Deliberation 2.0: Standards, DiscourseTypes and Sequenzialization. <http://ash.harvard.edu/extension/ash/docs/baechtiger.pdf> Retrieved October 10, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpini, M.X. Delli; Lomax Cook, F. & Jacobs, L.R. (2004) ‘Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315-344.10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630]Search in Google Scholar
[Chu, Y.W. & Tang, J.T.H. (2005) ‘The Internet and Civil Society: Environmental and Labour Organizations in Hong Kong’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29: 849-866.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00625.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, J. & Fung, A. (2004) ‘Radical Democracy’, Swiss Journal of Political Science 10(4): 23-34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlberg, L. (2001a) ‘Democracy via Cyberspace: Mapping the Rhetorics and Practices of Three Prominent Camps’, New Media & Society 3(2) 157-177.10.1177/14614440122226038]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlberg, L. (2001b) ‘Computer-Mediated Communication and the Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis’, Journalof Computer-Mediated Communication 7(1). <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlberg.html>10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlberg, L. (2004) ‘Net-Public Sphere Research: Beyond the “First Phase”’, Javnost ‒ The Public 11(1): 5-22.10.1080/13183222.2004.11008845]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlberg, L. (2007) ‘Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyber-Public: From Consensus to Contestation’, New Media & Society 9(5): 829-849.10.1177/1461444807081228]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlberg, L. (2011) ‘Re-constructing Digital Democracy: An Outline of Four ‘Positions’’, New Media andSociety 13(6): 855-872.10.1177/1461444810389569]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlgren, P. & Olsson, T. (2008) ‘Facilitating Political Participation: Young Citizens, Internet and Civic Cultures’, in Livingstone, S. & Drotner, K. (eds) The International Handbook of Children, Media andCulture. London: Sage.10.4135/9781848608436.n30]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk, J. (2000) ’Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication’, in Hacker, K.L. & van Dijk, J. (eds) Digital Democracy. Issues of Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446218891.n3]Search in Google Scholar
[Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dumoulin, M. (2002) ‘Les forums électroniques: délibératifs et démocratique?’, in: Monière, D. (ed.) Internetet la Démocratie. <http://www.erudit.org/livre/moniered/2002> .]Search in Google Scholar
[Elster, J. (1983) ’Offentlighet og deltakelse. To teorier om deltakerdemokratiet’ (Public sphere and participation. Two Theories on Participatory Democracy), in Bergh, Trond (ed.) Deltakerdemokratiet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferree, M.M; Gamson, W.A.; Gerhards, J. & Rucht, D. (2002) ‘Four Models of the Public Sphere in Modern Democracies’, Theory and Society 31: 289-324.10.1023/A:1016284431021]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerhards, J. & Shäfer, M. (2010) ‘Is the Internet a Better Public Sphere? Comparing Old and New Media in the USA and Germany’, New Media & Society 12(1): 143-160.10.1177/1461444809341444]Search in Google Scholar
[Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category ofBourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.]Search in Google Scholar
[Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Habermas, J. (2006) ‘Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’, Communication Theory 16: 411-426.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Himelboim, I. (2011) ‘Civil Society and Online Political Discourse: The Network Structure of Unrestricted Discussions’, Communication Research 38(5): 634-659.10.1177/0093650210384853]Search in Google Scholar
[Janssen, D. & Kies, R. (2005) ‘Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy’, Acta Politica 40: 317-335.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500115]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, J. L. (2003) ‘Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government-Sponsored - A Comparison’, Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (4): 349-374.10.1111/j.1467-9477.2003.00093.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kjeldsen, J.E. (1998) ’Duellanter, følelser og urokkelige standpunkter - Fjernsynsdebatten som retorisk genre’ (Duellers, emotions and unwavering opinions - television debate as rhetorical genre), in Børdahl O. et al. Retorikkens omegn. Retorisk årbok 1998. Bergen: Senter for europeiske kulturstudier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myrvold, T. & Winsvold, M. (2005) ‘Lokalavisene som offentlige rom’ (Local newapapers as public spheres), in Saglie, J. & Bjørklund, T. (eds) Lokalvalg og lokalt folkestyre. Oslo: Gyldendal, 144-160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Papacharissi, Z. (2004) ‘Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups’, New Media & Society 6(2): 259-283.10.1177/1461444804041444]Search in Google Scholar
[Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democracy Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444]Search in Google Scholar
[Skogerbø, E. & Winsvold, M. (2011) ‘Audiences on the Move? Use and Assessment of Local Print and Online Newspapers’, European Journal of Communication 26(3): 214-229.10.1177/0267323111413112]Search in Google Scholar
[Strandberg, K. (2008) ‘Public Deliberation Goes On-line? An Analysis of Citizens’ Political Discussions on the Internet Prior to the Finnish Parliamentary Elections in 2007’, Javnost-the Public 15(1): 71-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ulrich, J. (2005a) ’Debat på nettet - det umuliges kunst? En case-analyse af nettets potentialer’ (Online debate - the art of the impossible). In Hoff, J. & Storgaard, K. (eds) Informationsteknologi og demokratiskinnovation.Fredriksberg: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ulrich, J. (2005b) ’Den demokratiske samtale på nettet’ (The democratic conversation on the Internet), in Torpe, L., Agger Nielsen, J.& Ulrich, J. (eds) Demokrati på nettet. Offentlighed, deltakelse og digitalkommunikation. Aalborg: Aalborg universitetsforlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, R.P. (1990) Basic Content Analysis. London: Sage University Paper.10.4135/9781412983488]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilhelm, A.G. (1999) ‘Virtual Sounding Boards: How Deliberative is Online Political Discussion?’, in Hauge B.N & Loader BD (eds) Digital Democracy. Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age, 154-178. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winsvold, M. (2009) ‘Arguing into the Digital Void. On the Position of Online Debates in the Local Public Spheres of Four Norwegian Municipalities’, Javnost - the Public 16(3): 39-54.10.1080/13183222.2009.11009008]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, S. & Street, J. (2007) ‘Democracy, Deliberation and Design: The Case of Online Discussion Forums’, New Media & Society 9(5): 849-869.10.1177/1461444807081230]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, G. (2003) ‘The Internet and Civil Society in China: A Preliminary Assessment’, Journal of ContemporaryChina, 12 (36): 453-475.10.1080/10670560305471]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, B. (2008) ‘NPOs in China: Some Issues Concerning Internet Communication’, Knowledge, Technologyand Policy 21(1): 37-42.10.1007/s12130-008-9039-7]Search in Google Scholar