Open Access

Prediction of Restraint Moments in Precast, Prestressed Structures Made Continuous


Cite

1. Finnish Concrete Society: “Concrete Textbook 2018, by201,” Vaasa, Finland, 2018, 568 pp. (In Finnish).Search in Google Scholar

2. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib): “CEB-FIP, Model Code 2010,” Final draft, Volume 1, Bulletin 65, Switzerland, 2012, 357 pp.Search in Google Scholar

3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units,” Section 5, “Concrete Structures,” Washington DC, USA, 2012, 332-589 pp.Search in Google Scholar

4. Miller R A, Castrodale R, Mirmiran A & Hastak M: “NCHRP Report 519, Connection of Simple Span Precast Concrete Girders for Continuity,” Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 2004, 202 pp.Search in Google Scholar

5. Abdalla O A, Ramirez J A & Lee R H, “Strand Deponding in Pretensioned Beams – Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders with Deponded Strands, Continuity Issues,” Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 1993, 265 pp.10.5703/1288284314206Search in Google Scholar

6. McDonagh M D & Hinkley K B, “Resolving Restraint Moments: Designing for Continuity in Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges,” PCI Journal, July-August 2003, 16 pp.10.15554/pcij.07012003.104.119Search in Google Scholar

7. Freyermuth C L: “Design of Continuous Highway Bridges with Precast, Prestressed Concrete Girders,” PCI Journal, April 1969, pp. 14-39.10.15554/pcij.04011969.14.39Search in Google Scholar

8. Meyerson R, Weyers R E, Via C E, Mokarem D W & Lane D S: “Evaluation of Models for Predicting (Total) Creep of Prestressed Concrete Mixtures,” Virginia, USA, 2002, 55 pp.Search in Google Scholar

9. “EN 1992-1-1, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. Part 1-1: General rules for buildings,” Brussels, Belgium, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bazant Z: “Mathematical Modeling of Creep and Shrinkage of Concrete,” Chapter 3, “Creep Analysis of Structures,” Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, 1988, pp. 217-273.Search in Google Scholar

11. ACI Committee 209: “Publication SP-76, Design for Creep & Shrinkage on Concrete Structures,” Chapter SP76-10, “Prediction of Creep, Shrinkage and Temperature Effects in Concrete Structures”, Detroit, USA, 1982, pp. 193-300.Search in Google Scholar

12. Menn C: “Prestressed Concrete Bridges”, Basel, Boston, Berlin, 1990, 546 pp.10.1007/978-3-0348-9131-8Search in Google Scholar

13. “EN 1992-2, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. Concrete Bridges. Design and Detailing Rules,” Brussels, Belgium, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

14. “EN 1992-2:2005/AC, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Concrete bridges. Design and Detailing Rules,” Brussels, Belgium, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

15. Trost H: “Creep, Relaxation and Shrinkage of Structural Concrete,” IABSE reports, Switzerland, 1991, Vol. 62, pp. 59-76.Search in Google Scholar

16. Trost H: “Auswirkungen des Superpositionsprinzips auf Kriech- und Relaxationsprobleme bei Beton und Spannbeton,” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau (Berlin – Wilmersdorf), No. 10, 1967, pp. 230-238 (in German).Search in Google Scholar

17. Bazant Z: “Prediction of Concrete Creep Effects Using Age-Adjusted Effective Modulus Method,” Journal of the American Concrete Institute, Vol 69, 1972, p.p 212-21710.14359/11265Search in Google Scholar

18. CEB: “Structural Effects of Time-Dependent Behaviour of Concrete,” Bulletin No. 215, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1993, 308 pp.Search in Google Scholar

19. Keitel H: “Selecting an Advanced Creep Model or a Sophisticated Time-Integration? A new Approach by means of Sensitivity Analysis,” International Journal of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 7, 2012, pp. 724-731Search in Google Scholar

20. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib): “CEB-FIP, Model Code 2010,” Final draft, Volume 2, Bulletin 66, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2012, 377 pp.Search in Google Scholar

21. Tadros M K, Girgis M A, Tuan C Y & Alex A A: “Simplified Design for Positive Restraint Continuity Moment in Bridge Girders.” PCI Journal, July-August 2018, pp. 62-78.10.15554/pcij63.4-04Search in Google Scholar

22. Hendy C R & Smith D A: “Designer’s Guide to EN 1992-2, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. Part 2: Concrete Bridges,” London, UK, 2007, 196 pp.Search in Google Scholar

23. ACI Committee 209: “Publication SP-76, Design for Creep & Shrinkage on Concrete Structures,” Chapter SP76-13, “A Simple Method to Analyse Time-Dependent Forces Developed in Continous Concrete Structures” Detroit, USA, 1982, pp. 325-339Search in Google Scholar

24. Betonikeskus Ry: “SCC – Self Consolidating Concrete,” Loviisa, Finland, 2004. (In Finnish).Search in Google Scholar

25. “EN 12390-13, Testing Hardened Concrete, Part 13: Determination of Secant Modulus of Elasticity in Compression,” 2013.Search in Google Scholar

26. Tia M, Liu Y & Brown D: “Modulus of Elasticity, Creep and Shrinkage of Concrete,” University of Florida, USA, 2005, 185 pp.Search in Google Scholar

27. Mattock A H:”Precast-prestressed concrete bridges 5, Creep and Shrinkage studies,” Journal of the PCA Recearch Laboratories, Vol 2, No. 2, 1961, pp. 32-66.Search in Google Scholar

28. Mirmiran A, Kulkarni S, Castrodale R, Miller R & Hastak M: “Nonlinear Continuity Analysis of Precast, Prestressed Concrete Girders with Cast-in-Place Decks and Diaphragms,” PCI Journal, September-October 2001, pp. 60-80.10.15554/pcij.09012001.60.80Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2545-2819
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Materials Sciences, Materials Processing