About not Correcting for Systematic Effects

[1] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008). Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2012). International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). JCGM 200:2012, 3 edition.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ellison, S. L. R., Williams, A. (eds.) (2012). EURACHEM / CITAC Guide CG 4 – Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. EURACHEM, 3 edition. ISBN 978-0-948926-30-3.Search in Google Scholar

[4] EURAMET (2011). Uncertainty of Force Measurements, Vol. cg-4. EURAMET, 2 edition. (03/2011) ISBN 978-3-942992-03-9.Search in Google Scholar

[5] EURAMET (2015). Guidelines on the Calibration of Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments, Vol. cg-18. EURAMET, 4 edition. (11/2015) ISBN 978-3-942992-40-4.Search in Google Scholar

[6] International Organization for Standardization (2005). Gas analysis – Investigation and treatment of analytical bias. ISO 15796:2005.Search in Google Scholar

[7] International Organization for Standardization (2007). Air quality – Guidelines for estimating measurement uncertainty. ISO 20988:2007.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) (2018)a. Richtlinie DKD-R 3-3, Kalibrierung von Kraftmessgeräten. Braunschweig, Germany: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) (2018)b. Richtlinie DKD-R 3-5, Kalibrierung von Drehmomentmessgeräten für statische Wechseldrehmomente. Braunschweig, Germany: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) (2018)c. Richtlinie DKD-R 3-7, Statische Kalibrierung von anzeigenden Drehmomentschlüsseln. Braunschweig, Germany: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) (2018)d. Richtlinie DKD-R 3-8, Statische Kalibrierung von Kalibrierein- richtungen für Drehmomentschraubwerkzeuge. Braun- schweig, Germany: Physikalisch-Technische Bunde- sanstalt.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) (2018)e. Richtlinie DKD-R 3-9, Kontinuierliche Kalibrierung von Kraftaufnehmern nach dem Vergleichsverfahren. Braunschweig, Germany: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) (2014). Richtlinie DKD-R 6-1, Kalibrierung von Druckmessgeräten. Braunschweig, Germany: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Revision 2.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Phillips, S. D., Eberhardt, K. R., Parry, B. (1997). Guidelines for expressing the uncertainty of measurement results containing uncorrected bias. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 102(5), 577–585.10.6028/jres.102.039489458027805145Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lira, I. H., Wöger, W. (1998). Evaluation of the uncertainty associated with a measurement result not corrected for systematic effects. Measurement Science and Technology 9(6), 1010.10.1088/0957-0233/9/6/019Search in Google Scholar

[16] Haesselbarth, W. (2004). Accounting for bias in measurement uncertainty estimation. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 9(8), 509–514.10.1007/s00769-004-0782-5Search in Google Scholar

[17] Synek, V. (2005). Attempts to include uncorrected bias in the measurement uncertainty. Talanta 65(4), 829–837.10.1016/j.talanta.2004.07.03818969876Search in Google Scholar

[18] Magnusson, B., Ellison, S. L. R. (2008). Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 390(1), 201–213.10.1007/s00216-007-1693-118026721Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hernla, M. (2008). Messunsicherheit bei nicht korrigierten systematischen Messabweichungen. tm Technisches Messen 75(11), 609–615.10.1524/teme.2008.0739Search in Google Scholar

[20] Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (2010). Erklärung der PTB zur Behandlung systematischer Abweichungen bei der Berechnung der Messunsicherheit. https://www.ptb.de/cms/fileadmin/internet/fachabteilungen/abteilung_8/8.4_mathematische_modellierung/8.40/GUM_-_systematische_Abweichungen.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008). Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement“ – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Robert, C. P. (2007). The Bayesian Choice: From Decision-Theoretic Foundations to Computational Implementation. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wöger, W. (2001). Zu den modernen Grundlagen der Datenauswertung in der Metrologie. PTB-Mitteilungen 3, 210–225.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Lira, I. (2002). Evaluating the Measurement Uncertainty: Fundamentals and Practical Guidance. CRC Press.10.1201/9781420034363Search in Google Scholar

[25] Wang, C. M., Iyer, H. K. (2010). On multiple-method studies. Metrologia 47(6), 642.10.1088/0026-1394/47/6/002Search in Google Scholar