Effectiveness of Automatic Correction of Systematic Effects in Measuring Chains

[1] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1st edition. JCGM 100:2008.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Pavese, F. (2012). On the difference of meaning of ’zero correction’: zero value versus no correction, and of the associated uncertainties. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology IX. World Scientific, 297-309.10.1142/9789814397957_0037Search in Google Scholar

[3] Pavese, F. (2013). Why should correction values be better known than the measurand true value? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 459, 012036.10.1088/1742-6596/459/1/012036Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pavese, F. (2012). Corrections and input quantities in measurement models. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 3, 155-159.10.1051/ijmqe/2012024Search in Google Scholar

[5] Danilov, A.A., Kurchenko, Yu. (2015). Calibration method of measuring instruments in operating conditions. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology X. World Scientific, 149-155.10.1142/9789814678629_0017Search in Google Scholar

[6] Krilov, A., Marinko, S, Boyko, L. (2015). Considerations on the influence of test equipment instability and calibration methods on measurement uncertainty of the test laboratory. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology X. World Scientific, 219-228.10.1142/9789814678629_0026Search in Google Scholar

[7] Pavese, F. (2018). On the classification into random and systematic effects. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing XI. World Scientific, 58-69.10.1142/9789813274303_0006Search in Google Scholar

[8] Keithley Instruments. Low Level Measurements Handbook - 7^th Edition : Precision DC Current, Voltage and Resistance Measurements.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Meijer, G.C.M. (ed.) (2008). Smart Sensor Systems. John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9780470866931Search in Google Scholar

[10] Tuz, Ju.M. (1976). Structural Methods to Improve the Accuracy of Measuring Devices. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola. (in Rusian)Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bromberg, E.M. (1978). Test Methods for Improving the Accuracy of Measurements. Moscow: Energia. (in Russian)Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wang, G., Meijer, G.C. (2000). Accurate DEM SC amplification of small differential-voltage with CM level from ground to VDD. In Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Electronics and MEMS. SPIE, Vol. 3990. DOI: 10.1117/12.388913.10.1117/12.388913Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Keithley Instruments. (2008). Switching Handbook: A Guide to Signal Switching in Automated Test Systems, 6^th Edition.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Dorozhovets, M. (2015). Uncertainty of correction of the systematic effects and drifts. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 11, 300-304. (in Polish)Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bayley, G.V., Hammersley, G.M. (1946). The “effective” number of independent observations in an autocorrelated time-series. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 8 (2), 184-197.10.2307/2983560Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhang, N.F. (2006). Calculation of the uncertainty of the mean of autocorrelated measurements. Metrologia 43 (4), 276-281.10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S15Search in Google Scholar

[17] Warsza, Z., Dorozhovets, M. (2008). Uncertainty type A evaluation of autocorrelated measurement observations. Biuletyn WAT, LVII (2), 143-152.Search in Google Scholar

[18] National Instruments Corporation. NI 6250/6251/6254/6259 Multifunction 16 bit Data Acquisition. Datasheet. http://www.ni.com.Search in Google Scholar