Analysis of Flatness Deviations for Austenitic Stainless Steel Workpieces after Efficient Surface Machining

[1] Niemczewska-Wójcik, M., Sładek, J., Tabaka, M., Wójcik, A. (2012). Product quality assessment - measurement and analysis of the surface topography. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 21 (2), 271-280.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hloch, S., Valicek, J. (2011). Prediction of distribution relationship of titanium surface topography created by abrasive waterjet. International Journal of Surface Science and Engineering, 5 (2-3), 152-168.10.1504/IJSURFSE.2011.041399Search in Google Scholar

[3] Wen, X-L. et al. (2012). Flatness error evaluation and verification based on new generation geometrical product specification (GPS). Precision Engineering, 36 (1), 70-76.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2011.07.006Search in Google Scholar

[4] Tolerances of form, orientation - general terms (replace by [14]). PN-78/M-02137.Search in Google Scholar

[5] International Organization for Standardization. (1999). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Geometrical features. Part 1: General terms and definitions. ISO 14660-1:1999.Search in Google Scholar

[6] International Organization for Standardization. (1999). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Geometrical features. Part 2: Extracted median line of a cylinder and a cone, extracted median surface, local size of an extracted feature. ISO 14660-2:1999.Search in Google Scholar

[7] International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Geometrical Products Specifications (GPS) - Flatness - Part 1: Vocabulary and parameters of flatness. ISO/TS 12781-1:2003.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ricci, F. (2012). Effective Product Lifecycle Management: the role of uncertainties in addressing design, manufacturing and verification processes. PhD thesis, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy. http://porto.polito.it/2501694/1/Tesi_Ricci.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Calvo, R., Gómez, E., Domingo, R. (2014). Vectorial method of minimum zone tolerance for flatness, straightness, and their uncertainty estimation. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15 (1), 31-44.10.1007/s12541-013-0303-8Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ilyas Khan, M., Ma, S.Y. (2014). Efficient genetic algorithms for measurement of flatness error and development of flatness plane based on minimum zone method. Advanced Materials Research, 941, 2232-2238.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.941-944.2232Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ye, R.F. et al. (2012). Minimum zone evaluation of flatness error using an adaptive iterative strategy for coordinate measuring machines data. Advanced Materials Research, 472, 25-29.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.472-475.25Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ren, M.J., Cheung, C.F., Kong, L.B. (2012). A task specific uncertainty analysis method for least-squaresbased form characterization of ultra-precision freeform surfaces. Measurement Science and Technology, 23 (5), 054005.10.1088/0957-0233/23/5/054005Search in Google Scholar

[13] He, G. et al. (2014). Conicity error evaluation using sequential quadratic programming algorithm. Precision Engineering, 38 (2), 330-336.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[14] International Organization for Standardization. (2006). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Geometrical tolerancing - Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out. UNE-EN ISO 1101:2006.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lakota, S., Görög, A. (2011). Flatness measurement by multi-point methods and by scanning methods. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1 (1), 124-127.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Skibicki, D., Sempruch, J., Pejkowski, L. (2012). Steel X2CrNiMo17-12-2 Testing for uniaxial, proportional and non-proportional loads as delivered and in the annealed condition. Materials Science Forum, 726, 171-180.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.726.171Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dobrzański, L.A., Brytan, Z., Rosso, M. (2007). Sinter-hardening process applicable to stainless steels. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 24 (2), 11-18.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Deutsche Edelstahlwerke GmbH. (2008). Nichtrostender austenitischer Stahl X2CrNiMo17-12-2. http://www.dew-stahl.com/fileadmin/files/dewstahl.com/documents/Publikationen/Werkstoffdatenblaetter/RSH/1.4404_de.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Stout, K.J. et al. (1993). The Development of Methods for the Characterization of Roughness in Three Dimensions. Publication No. EUR 15178 EN (Final Report) BCR. Brussels, Belgium: European Community.Search in Google Scholar