Basins of attraction of a one-parameter family of root-finding techniques

[1] S. Abbasbandy, Improving Newton-Raphson Method for Nonlinear Equations by Modified Adomian Decomposition Method, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 145, (2003), 887–893. Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. Adomian. Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: The Decomposition Method, Boston (1994). Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Amat, S. Busquier, and S. Plaza, Review of some iterative root-finding methods from a dynamical point of view, Scientia, 10, (2004), 3–35. Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Amat, S. Busquier, and S. Plaza, Dynamics of the king and jarratt iterations, Aequationes Mathematicae, 69, (2005), 212–223. Search in Google Scholar

[5] G. Ardelean, A comparison between iterative methods by using the basins of attraction, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, (2011), 88–95. Search in Google Scholar

[6] E. Babolian and J. Biazar, Solution of Nonlinear Equations by Modified Adomian Decomposition Method, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 132, (2002), 167–172. Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. Babolian and J. Biazar, On the Order of Convergence of Adomian Method, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 130, (2002), 383–387. Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Basto, T. Abreu, V. Semiao, and F. Calheiros, Convergence and dynamics of structurally identical root finding methods, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 120, (2017), 257–269. Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Basto, L. P. Basto, V. Semiao, and F. Calheiros, Contrasts in the basins of attraction of structurally identical iterative root finding methods, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, (2013), 7997–8008. Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Basto, V. Semiao, and F. Calheiros, A New Iterative Method to Compute Nonlinear Equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173, (2006), 468–483. Search in Google Scholar

[11] H. Bateman, Halley’s method for solving equations, The American Mathematical Monthly, 45, (1938), 11–17. Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. Chun, A New Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 178, (2006), 415–422. Search in Google Scholar

[13] C. Chun, M. Y. Lee, B. Neta, and J. Dzunic, On optimal fourth-order iterative methods free from second derivative and their dynamics, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, (2012), 6427–6438. Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Chun, B. Neta, J. Kozdon, and M. Scott, Choosing weight functions in iterative methods for simple roots, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 227, (2014), 788–800. Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. Chun and M. Young Lee, A new optimal eighth-order family of iterative methods for the solution of nonlinear equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 223, (2013), 506–519. Search in Google Scholar

[16] F. V. Haeseler and H. O. Peitgen, Newton’s method and complex dynamical systems, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 13, (1988), 3–58. Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. S. Householder, The Numerical Treatment of a Single Equation. McGraw-Hill, New York (1970). Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Maruster, Numerical experiments on attraction basin, Annals. Computer Science Series, 2(1), (2004), 162 – 171. Search in Google Scholar

[19] B. Neta, C. Chun, and M. Scott, Basins of attraction for optimal eighth order methods to find simple roots of nonlinear equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 227, (2014), 567–592. Search in Google Scholar

[20] B. Neta, C. Chun, and M. Scott, On the development of iterative methods for multiple roots, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 224, (2013), 358–361. Search in Google Scholar

[21] B. Neta and M. Scott, On a family of halley-like methods to find simple roots of nonlinear equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, (2013), 7940–7944. Search in Google Scholar

[22] B. Neta, M. Scott, and C. Chun, Basin attractors for various methods for multiple roots, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, (2012), 5043–5066. Search in Google Scholar

[23] B. Neta, M. Scott, and C. Chun, Basins of attraction for several methods to find simple roots of nonlinear equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, (2012), 10548–10556. Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. A. Noor and F. Ahmad, Numerical comparison of iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 180(1), (2006), 167–172. Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor, W. A. Khan, and F. Ahmad, On iterative methods for nonlinear equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 183, (2006). 128–133. Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. S. Petkovic, B. Neta, L. D. Petkovic, and J. Dzunic, Multipoint Methods for Solving Nonlinear Equations, Elsevier (2012). Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Scott, B. Neta, and C. Chun, Basin attractors for various methods, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, (2011), 2584–2599. Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. K. Singh, I. K. Argyros, and A. K. Singh, An optimal 8th order newton’s-type method with basin of attraction, SeMA Journal, 79, (2022), 631–645. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Y. Tao and K. Madhu, Optimal fourth, eighth and sixteenth order methods by using divided difference techniques and their basins of attraction and its application, Mathematics, 7, (2019), 322. Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. F. Traub, Iterative Methods for the Solution of Equations, Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1964). Search in Google Scholar

[31] J. L. Varona, Graphic and numerical comparison between iterative methods, The Mathematical Intelligencer, 24(1), (2002), 37–46. Search in Google Scholar