Open Access

Types of maps used as a stimuli in cartographical empirical research


Cite

Figure 1

Number of analysed papers per yearSource: own elaboration
Number of analysed papers per yearSource: own elaboration

Figure 2

Percent of map types used in analysed papersSource: own elaboration
Percent of map types used in analysed papersSource: own elaboration

Figure 3

Percentage of paper and screen mapsSource: own elaboration
Percentage of paper and screen mapsSource: own elaboration

Figure 4

Relation between medium and level of reactivenessSource: own elaboration based on Kraak & Brown 2001
Relation between medium and level of reactivenessSource: own elaboration based on Kraak & Brown 2001

Figure 5

Percentage of interactive and non-interactive mapsSource: own elaboration
Percentage of interactive and non-interactive mapsSource: own elaboration

Figure 6

Percentage of maps elaborated with qualitative and quantitative methods of cartographic presentationSource: own elaboration
Percentage of maps elaborated with qualitative and quantitative methods of cartographic presentationSource: own elaboration

Figure 7

Percentage of maps of fictional, familiar and unfamiliar data or areaSource: own elaboration
Percentage of maps of fictional, familiar and unfamiliar data or areaSource: own elaboration

Types of maps used in analysed papers

FeatureMediumInteractivityMethod of cartographic presentationFamiliarity with data or area
Typepaperscreennon-interactiveinteractivequalitativequantitativefictionalfamiliarunfamiliar
Number of papers198968409159143564
Percent of papers18,4%86,4%66,0%38,9%88,3%57,3%13,6%34,0%62,1%

Types of maps

Author(s) yearpaperscreennon-interactiveinteractivequalitativequantitativefictionalfamiliarunfamiliar
Aerts, Clarke & Keuper 2003++++++
Aggett & McColl 2006+++++
Ahonen-Rainio & Kraak 2005++++
Andrienko et al. 2002++++
Baker et al. 2016+++++
Bearman & Lovett 2010++++
Behrens, van Elzakker & Schmidt 2015++++++
Bestgen et al. 2017+++++
Biland & çöltekin 2017++++
Bishop, Haggerty & Richardson 2015+++++
Brügger, Fabrikant & Çöltekin 2016+++++
Brychtova & Çöltekin 2016++++
Brychtová & Çöltekin 2017+++++
Bunch & Lloyd 2000++++
Cheung, Li & Chen 2009++++
Czepkiewicz, Jankowski & Młodkowski 2017++++
Deeb et al. 2014++++
Deeb et al. 2015++++
Deeb, Ooms & Maeyer 2012++++
Demšar 2007+++++
Dickmann 2012++++++
Dickmann et al. 2017++++
Dillemuth 2005++++
Dillemuth 2009+++++
Dong et al. 2016++++
Dong, Ran & Wang 2012++++
Edler et al. 2014++++
Fabrikant et al. 2008++++
Field 2010+++++
Fish, Goldsberry & Battersby 2011++++
Fujita & Arikawa 2011+++++
Gołębiowska 2015+++++
Griffin & Bell 2009++++
Harrower 2007++++
Harrower, MacEachren & Griffin 2000+++++
Hegarty et al. 2009+++++
Hennerdal 2017++++
Herbert & Chen 2015+++++
Hochmair 2009+++++
Hope & Hunter 2007+++++
Huang, Schmidt & Gartner 2012++++
Kiik, Nyström & Harrie 2017++++
Kinkeldey et al. 2014++++
Koletsis et al. 2017+++++
Korpi, Hall & Ahonen-Rainio 2014++++
Kubíček et al. 2017+++++
Laakso & Tiina Sarjakoski 2010++++++
Lai & Yeh 2004+++++
Lautenschütz 2012+++++
Leitner & Buttenfield 2000+++++
Li & Ho 2004++++
Liao et al. 2017++++
Lloyd & Bunch 2005++++
Lloyd & Bunch 2008++++
Lloyd & Patton 2011+++++
Lorenz et al. 2013++++
Luebbering & Carstensen 2009++++
Luebbering et al. 2008+++++
Maggi et al. 2017+++++
McKendry 2000+++++
Mendonça & Delazari 2012++++
Mendonça & Delazari 2014+++++
Michaelidou, Nakos & Filippakopoulou 2004+++++
Midtbø & Nordvik 2007++++
Muehlenhaus 2012++++++
Multimäki et al. 2016++++
Murakoshi & Higashi 2016+++++
Nelson 2002++++++
Nivala & Sarjakoski 2007++++++
Nivala, Brewster & Sarjakoski 2008++++++
Nossum 2012+++++
Nossum 2014+++++
Oksanen et al. 2014++++++
Ooms et al. 2012++++
Ooms et al. 2016+++++
Ooms, Dupont & Lapon 2017++++++
Ooms, Maeyer & Fack 2014+++++
Opach & Rød 2014+++++
Opach et al. 2017++++
Opach, Gołębiowska & Fabrikant 2014+++++
Ory et al. 2015++++++
Paula Santil, Sluter & Meza Bravo 2011++++
Perdue & Lobben 2016++++
Phipps 2011++++++
Popelka & Brychtova 2013+++++
Poplin 2015++++
Poplin, Guan & Lewis 2016++++++
Pugliesi, Decanini & Tachibana 2009++++
Putto et al. 2014+++++
Raposo & Brewer 2014+++++
Retchless 2014+++++
Reyes Nuñez & Juhász 2015++++
Rigby & Winter 2016++++
Roth & MacEachren 2016+++++
Roth 2009+++++
Sadahiro 2000++++
Saint-Marc et al. 2017+++++
Šavrič et al. 2015++++
Slocum et al. 2004++++
Stigmar & Harrie 2011++++
Sun & Li 2010+++++
Swienty et al. 2008++++
Wiegand 2002++++
TOTAL198968409159143564
18,4%86,4%66,0%38,8%88,3%57,3%13,6%34,0%62,1%

Number of analysed papers per journal (since 2000)

Title of a journalPublished sinceNumber of published papers since 2000 (nPp)Number of analysed papers since 2000 (nAp)nApnPp×100%$\begin{array}{} \rm{\frac{nAp}{nPp}\times100\text{%}} \end{array}$
The Cartographic Journal1964422409.5%
Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization1965273176.2%
Cartography and Geographic Information Science1973465398.4%
International Journal of Cartography201536719.4 %
11961038.6%
eISSN:
2084-6118
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Geosciences, Geography, other