Open Access

A thematic cartographic visualization of a small region, based on the example of the Mrozy Commune


Cite

Figure 1

Study stages (own elaboration)
Study stages (own elaboration)

Figure 2

General map (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials
General map (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials

Figure 3

Land cover map (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials
Land cover map (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials

Figure 4

Map of protected areas (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials
Map of protected areas (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials

Figure 5

Population of the Mrozy commune (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials
Population of the Mrozy commune (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials

Figure 6

Population distribution for the Mrozy commune (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials
Population distribution for the Mrozy commune (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials

Figure 7

Map of population change (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials
Map of population change (reduced by 60%) (own elaboration) The original size map is available in Supplementary Online Materials

Figure 8

Differences in boundaries (scale reduced) (own elaboration)
Differences in boundaries (scale reduced) (own elaboration)

Figure 9

Three degrees of detail in the presentation of buildings: ‘buildings’ (9a.), ’built-up areas’ (9b.), and ’individual buildings’ (9c.) (own elaboration)
Three degrees of detail in the presentation of buildings: ‘buildings’ (9a.), ’built-up areas’ (9b.), and ’individual buildings’ (9c.) (own elaboration)

Figure 10

Buildings and roads: before modification (a) and after modification (b) (own elaboration)
Buildings and roads: before modification (a) and after modification (b) (own elaboration)

Figure 11

(a) Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) http://www.mrozy.pl/ (25th April 2017) (b) Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) (own elaboration)
(a) Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) http://www.mrozy.pl/ (25th April 2017) (b) Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) (own elaboration)

Figure 12

Different presentation of forest: a. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) http://www.mrozy.pl/ (25th April 2017) b. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) (own elaboration)
Different presentation of forest: a. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) http://www.mrozy.pl/ (25th April 2017) b. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) (own elaboration)

Figure 13

Differences in the presentation of the road network: a. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) http://www.mrozy.pl/ (25th April 2017) b. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) (own elaboration)
Differences in the presentation of the road network: a. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) http://www.mrozy.pl/ (25th April 2017) b. Map of the Mrozy commune (fragm.) (own elaboration)
eISSN:
2084-6118
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Geosciences, Geography, other