The role of landscape preferences in the travel decisions of railway passengers: Evidence from Hungary

ALDSKOGIUS, H. (1977): A conceptual framework and a Swedish case study of recreational behavior and environmental cognition. Economic Geography, 53(2): 163–183.10.2307/142723Search in Google Scholar

BARROSO, F. L., PINTO-CORREIA, T., RAMOS, I. L., SUROVÁ, D., MENEZES, H. (2012): Dealing with landscape fuzziness in user preference studies: Photo-based questionnaires in the Mediterranean context. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(3–4): 329–342.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.005Search in Google Scholar

BEZA, B. B. (2010): The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(4): 306–317.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar

BOURASSA, S. C. (19888). Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15(3–4): 241–252.10.1016/0169-2046(88)90048-5Search in Google Scholar

BUCKLEY, R. (2006): Environmental Inputs and Outputs in Ecotourism: Geotourism with a Positive Triple Bottom Line? Journal of Ecotourism, 2(1): 76–82.10.1080/14724040308668135Search in Google Scholar

BUIJS, A. E., ELANDS, B. H. M., LANGERS, F. (2009): No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences, Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(3): 113–123.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.003Search in Google Scholar

BUEHLER, R., NOBIS, C. (2010): Travel behavior in aging societies, comparison of Germany and the United States. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2182: 62–70.10.3141/2182-09Search in Google Scholar

BUNTING, T. E., GUELKE, L. (1979): Behavioral and perception geography: a critical appraisal. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 69(3): 448–462.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01268.xSearch in Google Scholar

CHUA, B., SANGHYEOP, L., HUFFMAN, L., CHOI, H. (2015): The Role of Physical Environment in Leisure Service Consumption: Evidence From a Ski Resort Setting. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration 4: 375–407.10.1080/15256480.2015.1090258Search in Google Scholar

COCEAN, G. (2010): The tourist role of relief as landscape background. Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 6(1): 79–90.Search in Google Scholar

CSORBA, P., LÓCZY, D., MEZŐSI, G. (2004): Recent landscape research in Hungary. BELGEO – Revue Belge de Geographie, 2–3: 289–300.10.4000/belgeo.13813Search in Google Scholar

DACHARY-BERNARD, J. RAMBONILAZA, T. (2012): Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process? Land Use Policy, 29(4): 846–854.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.002Search in Google Scholar

DANIEL, T. C., BOSTER, R. S. (1976): Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA, Fort Collins, CO. USDA Forest Service Research Paper No. RM-167.Search in Google Scholar

DE LA FUENTE DE VAL, G., MÜHLHAUSER S. H. (2014): Visual quality: An examination of a South American Mediterranean landscape, Andean foothills east of Santiago (Chile). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(2): 261–271.10.1016/j.ufug.2014.01.006Search in Google Scholar

DENSTADLI, J. M., JACOBSEN, J. S. (2011): The long and winding roads: Perceived quality of scenic tourism routes. Tourism Management, 32(4): 780–789.10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.014Search in Google Scholar

DESBARATS, J. (1983). Spatial choice and constraints on behavior. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(3): 340–357.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1983.tb01421.xSearch in Google Scholar

DIJST, M., FARAG, S., SCHWANEN, T. (2008): A comparative study of attitude theory and other theoretical models for understanding travel behaviour. Environment and Planning A, 40(4): 831–847.10.1068/a39151Search in Google Scholar

FABOS, J. G. (1971): An analysis of environmental quality ranking systems in recreation. In: Recreation Symp. Proc. (pp. 40–55). Northeastern For. Exp. Stn., USDA For. Serv., Upper Darby, PA.Search in Google Scholar

FAGGI, A., BREUSTE, J., MADANES, N., GROPPER, C., PERELMAN, P. (2013): Water as an appreciated feature in the landscape: a comparison of residents’ and visitors’ preferences in Buenos Aires. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60: 182–187.10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.009Search in Google Scholar

FORNAL-PIENIAK, B., ŻARSKA, B. (2014): Methods of landscape evaluation for tourism and recreation. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum – Formatio Circumiectus, 13(2): 3–9.10.15576/ASP.FC/2014.13.2.3Search in Google Scholar

FRANK, S., FÜRST, C., KOSCHKE, L., WITT, A., MAKESCHIN, F. (2013): Assessment of landscape aesthetics—Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecological Indicators, 32: 222–231.10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026Search in Google Scholar

FREDE, H. G., BACH, M., FOHRER, N., MÖLLER, D., STEINER, N. (2002): Multifunktionalität der Landschaft – Methoden und Modelle. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 146: 58–63.Search in Google Scholar

FYHRI, A., JACOBSEN, J. K. S., TØMMERVIK, H. (2009): Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian coastal region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(4): 202–211.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.002Search in Google Scholar

GALAMBOS, J. (1989): New concepts in landscape assessment: a dynamic landscape assessment. In: Pécsi, M. [ed.]: Geomorphological and geoecological essays (pp. 87–97). Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar

GARRE, S., MEEUS, S., GULINCK, H. (2009): The dual role of roads in the visual landscape: A case study in the area around Mechelen (Belgium). Landscape and Urban Planning, 92: 125–135.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.04.001Search in Google Scholar

GERGEL, S. E., TUNER, M. G. [eds.] (2017): Learning Landscape Ecology. A Practical Guide to Concepts and Techniques. New York, Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

GOLLEDGE, R. G. (1997): Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

GYURICZA, L., AMBRUS, T. (2008): An attempt at the quantitative evolution of the natural endowments of tourism. In: Matei, E. [ed.]: Sustainable Tourism Development in the Carpathian Mountains: The First International Carpathians Tourism Conference (pp. 42–65). Bucuresti, Universitara Housing Press.Search in Google Scholar

HALSALL D. A. (2001): Railway heritage and the tourist gaze: Stoomtram Hoorn-Medemblik. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(2): 151–160.10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00030-2Search in Google Scholar

HORVÁTH G. (2008): Természeti, táji értékek számszerű minősítése. In: Csorba, P., Fazekas, I. [eds.]: Tájkutatás – tájökológia (pp. 73–85). Debrecen, Meridián Alapítvány.Search in Google Scholar

HOWLEY, P. (2011): Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general public’s preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics, 72: 161–169.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026Search in Google Scholar

JACOBSEN, J. K. S. (2007): Use of Landscape Perception Methods in Tourism Studies: A Review of Photo-Based Research Approaches. Tourism Geographies – An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 9(3): 234–253.10.1080/14616680701422871Search in Google Scholar

JADE, R., MOLKOVÁ, T., KVIZDA, M. (2015): Role of railways in empowering travelers: A case study from the Czech Republic. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 5(2): 31–49.10.1016/j.jrtpm.2015.03.001Search in Google Scholar

JASZCZAK, A., ŽUKOVSKIS, J. (2011): Landscape valuation in development of rural tourism: case study of Ostfriesland (Germany). Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development, 5(29): 89–95.Search in Google Scholar

JEANLOZ, S., LIZIN, S., BEENAERTS, N., BROUWER, R., VAN PASSEL, S., WITTERS, N. (2016): Towards a more structured selection process for attributes and levels in choice experiments: A study in a Belgian protected area. Ecosystem Services, 18: 45–57.10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.006Search in Google Scholar

JOLY, D., BROSSARD, T., CAVAILHES, J., HILAL, M., TOURNEUX, F. P., TRITZ, C., WAVRESKY, P. (2009): A quantitative approach to the visual evaluation of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(2): 292–308.10.1080/00045600802708473Search in Google Scholar

JUNGE, X., SCHÜPBACH, B., WALTER, T., SCHMID, B., LINDEMANN-MATTHIES, P. (2015): Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133: 67–77.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010Search in Google Scholar

KALIVODA, O., VOJAR, J., SKŘIVANOVÁ, Z., ZAHRADNÍK, D. (2014): Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics, Journal of Environmental Management, 137: 36–44.10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.00924594757Search in Google Scholar

KIRILLOVA, K., FU, X., LEHTO, X., CAI, L. (2014): What makes a destination beautiful? Dimensions of tourist aesthetic judgment. Tourism Management, 42: 282–293.10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.006Search in Google Scholar

KNUDSEN, D. C., SOPER, A. K., METRO-ROLAND, M. (2007): Commentary: Gazing, Performing and Reading: A Landscape Approach to Understanding Meaning in Tourism Theory. Tourism Geographies – An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 9(3): 227–233.10.1080/14616680701422681Search in Google Scholar

LEOPOLD, L. B. (1969): Quantitative comparison of some aesthetic factors among rivers. Geol. Survey Circ. 630: 1–16. USD1 Geological Survey, Washington, DC.10.3133/cir620Search in Google Scholar

LIU, B. (2015): Quality Evaluation and Structure Optimization of Tourism Landscape (pp. 267–270). International Conference on Management Science and Innovative Education (MSIE 2015).10.2991/msie-15.2015.51Search in Google Scholar

LÓCZY, D. (2015) [ed.]: Landscapes and Landforms of Hungary. Dordrecht, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.10.1007/978-3-319-08997-3Search in Google Scholar

MAROSI, S., SZILÁRD, J. (1985): Landscape topology and evaluation of the Balaton ‘Riviera’. In: Pécsi, M. [ed.]: Environmental and dynamic geomorphology: case studies in Hungary: contribution to the First International Geomorphological Conference, Manchester, (pp. 141–145). Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar

MARTÍN, M., ORTEGA, E., OTERO, I., ARCE, R. M. (2016): Landscape character assessment with GIS using map–based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads. Journal of Environmental Management, 180: 324–334.10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.04427240208Search in Google Scholar

MEZŐSI, G. (1990): Versuche zur Determination der ästhetischen Werte der Landschaft. Acta Universitas Szegediensis, Acta Geographica, 28–30: 51–66.Search in Google Scholar

MYGA-PIATEK, U., NITA, J. (2008): The scenic value of abandoned mining areas in Poland. Acta Geographica Debrecina, Landscape & Environment Series, 2(2): 132–142.Search in Google Scholar

NIKOLAISHVILI, D., DONADZE, T., MELADZE, G., TRAPAIDZE, V., DVALASHVILI, G., SHARASHENIDZE, M., TIGISHVILI, T. (2012): Evaluating the touristic potential of Georgia’s landscapes. Forum geografic. Studii ºi cercetări de geografie ºi protecþia mediului, 11(2): 145–154.10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2012.025.dSearch in Google Scholar

NITA, J., MYGA-PIATEK, U. (2014): Scenic values of the Katowice – Częstochowa section of national road No. 1. Geographica Polonica, 87(1): 113–125.10.7163/GPol.2014.7Search in Google Scholar

ODE, Å., Mari, S., TVEIT, M., FRY, G. (2008): Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory. Landscape Research, 33(1): 89–117.10.1080/01426390701773854Search in Google Scholar

PAGE, S. J. (2009): Transport and tourism global perspectives. London, Pearson, Prentice Hall, Harlow.Search in Google Scholar

PARDO-GARCÍA, S., MÉRIDA-RODRÍGUEZ, M. (2017): Measurement of visual parameters of landscape using projections of photographs in GIS, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 61, Part A: 56–65.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.09.005Search in Google Scholar

PETERSON, M. N., THURMOND, B., MCHALE, M., RODRIGUEZ, S., BONDELL, H. D., COOK, M. (2012): Predicting native plant landscaping preferences in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society, 5: 70–76.10.1016/j.scs.2012.05.007Search in Google Scholar

PHILLIPS, M. R., EDWARDS, A. M., WILLIAMS, A. T. (2010): An incremental scenic assessment of the Glamorgan Heritage Coast, UK. The Geographical Journal, 176(4): 291–303.10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00361.xSearch in Google Scholar

RIECHERS, M., BARKMANN, J., TSCHARNTKE, T. (2015): Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosystem Services, 17: 33–39.10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007Search in Google Scholar

ROGGE, E., NEVENS, F., GULINCK, H. (2007): Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(4): 159–174.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006Search in Google Scholar

ROSLEY, M. S. F., LAMIT, H., RAHMAN, S. R. A. (2016): Perceiving the Aesthetic Value of the Rural Landscape through Valid Indicators. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85: 318–331.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.362Search in Google Scholar

SCOTT, A. (2006): Assessing public perception of landscape: past, present and future perspectives. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 1(041).10.1079/PAVSNNR20061041Search in Google Scholar

SEVENANT, M., ANTROP, M. (2009): Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9): 2889–2899.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.01618950929Search in Google Scholar

SEVENANT, M., ANTROP, M. (2010): The use of latent classes to identify individual differences in the importance of landscape dimensions for aesthetic preference. Land Use Policy, 27(3): 827–842.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.002Search in Google Scholar

SHAFER, E. L., HAMILTON, J. F., SCHMIDT, E. A. (1969): Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research 1: 1–19.10.1080/00222216.1969.11969706Search in Google Scholar

SHAFER, E. L. (1969): Perception of natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 1(1): 71–82.10.1177/001391656900100105Search in Google Scholar

SCHIRPKE, U., TASSER, E., TAPPEINER, U. (2013): Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions, Landscape and Urban Planning, 111: 1–12.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.010Search in Google Scholar

SITWELL, O. F. G., LATHAM, G. R. (1979): Behavioural geography and the cultural landscape. Geografiska Annaler B, 51–63.10.1080/04353684.1979.11879442Search in Google Scholar

SWANWICK, C. (2009): Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy, 26: 62–75.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025Search in Google Scholar

TAGLIAFIERRO, C., BOERI, M., LONGO, A., HUTCHINSON, W. G. (2016): Stated preference methods and landscape ecology indicators: An example of transdisciplinarity in landscape economic valuation, Ecological Economics, 127: 11–22.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.022Search in Google Scholar

TIMMERMANS, H. (1981): Spatial choice behaviour in different environmental settings: an application of the revealed preference approach. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography, 63(1): 57–67.10.2307/490998Search in Google Scholar

TURNER, M. G., GARDNER, R. H. (2015): Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. Pattern and Process. New York, Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4939-2794-4Search in Google Scholar

TURNER, M. G., GARDNER, R. H., O’NEILL, R. V. (2001): Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. Pattern and Process. New York, Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

TVEIT, M., ODE, Å., FRY, G. (2007): Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3): 229–255.10.1080/01426390600783269Search in Google Scholar

VAN DER JAGT, A. P. N., CRAIG, T., ANABLE, J., BREWER, M. J., PEARSON, D. G. (2014): Unearthing the picturesque: The validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124: 1–13.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.006Search in Google Scholar

VAN DER ZEE, D. (1990): The complex relationship between landscape and recreation. Landscape Ecology, 4(4): 225–236.10.1007/BF00129830Search in Google Scholar

VAN ZANTEN, B. T., VERBURG, P. H., SCHOLTE, S. S. K., TIESKENS, K. F. (2016a): Using choice modeling to map aesthetic values at a landscape scale: Lessons from a Dutch case study. Ecological Economics, 130: 221–231.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.008Search in Google Scholar

VAN ZANTEN, B. T., ZASADA, I., KOETSE, M. J., UNGARO, F., HÄFNER, K., VERBURG, P. H. (2016b): A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 17: 87–98.10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011Search in Google Scholar

VARJÚ, V., SUVÁK, A., DOMBI, P. (2014): Geographic Information Systems in the Service of Alternative Tourism – Methods with Landscape Evaluation and Target Group Preference Weighting. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(5): 496–512.10.1002/jtr.1943Search in Google Scholar

VIZZARI, M. (2010): Spatial modelling of potential landscape quality. Applied Geography, 31(1): 108–118.10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.03.001Search in Google Scholar

VOULIGNY, É., DOMON, G., RUIZ, J. (2009): An assessment of ordinary landscapes by an expert and by its residents: Landscape values in areas of intensive agricultural use, Land Use Policy, 26(4): 890–900.10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.016Search in Google Scholar

WANG, R., ZHAO, J., LIU, Z. (2016): Consensus in visual preferences: The effects of aesthetic quality and landscape types. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20: 210–217.10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.005Search in Google Scholar

YOSHIHARA, T., NISHINA, D., TANAKA, T., KAWASE, K., TAKAGISHI, H. (2017): A Study on the Psychological Evaluation of Tourism Landscape Images in Hiroshima – A Psychological Evaluation by Korean Subjects. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(1): 223–229.10.3130/jaabe.16.223Search in Google Scholar

ZUBE, E. H. (1974): Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description and evaluation of landscape resources. Environment and Behavior, 6(1): 69–89.10.1177/001391657400600105Search in Google Scholar

ZUBE, E. H., PITT, D. G. ANDERSON, T. W. (1974): Perception and measurement of scenic resources in the southern Connecticut River Valley. Institute for Man and His Environment, PubI. R-74-1. Amherst, Mass.10.1080/01426397408705748Search in Google Scholar