Sustainable Construction Industry Development and Green Buildings: A Case of Latvia

1. European Commission. (2017). List of NACE codes. Retrieved 12 September 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/index/nace_all.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

2. Kantar TNS. (2017). On average 78% or 1 259 000 of the population of Latvia in the surveyed target group use the Internet on a regular basis. Retrieved 20 September 2017 from http://www.tns.lv/?lang=lv&fullarticle=true&category=showuid&id=5136Search in Google Scholar

3. Kauškale, L., Binovska, I., Geipele, I., & Vanags J. (2017) The comparative analysis of real estate market development in Baltic States. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 5. ISSN 2255-9671.10.1515/bjreecm-2017-0016Search in Google Scholar

4. Kauškale, L., Geipele, I., Zeltiņš, N., & Lecis, I. (2016). Energy aspects of green buildings - International experience. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 53(6), 21–28. Doi:10.1515/lpts-2016-004010.1515/lpts-2016-0040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Kauškale, L., Geipele, I., Zeltiņš, N., & Lecis, I. (2017). Environmental and energy aspects of construction industry and green buildings. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 54(2), 24–33. Doi:10.1515/lpts-2017-001010.1515/lpts-2017-0010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Kauškale, L., & Riemenschneider, F. (2016). The environmental and economic substantiation of investments in green buildings. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 4, 126–144. Doi:10.1515/bjreecm-2016-001010.1515/bjreecm-2016-0010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Lance, C.E., Lance, C.E., & Robert, J. (2010). Vandenberg. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in organizational and social sciences. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203867266Search in Google Scholar

8. Ņevoļskis, S., & Vanags, J. (2011). Sustainable apartment building potentialities in Latvia. Building Entrepreneurship and Real Estate Development, 1, 137–149. ISSN 2243-6030.Search in Google Scholar

9. People Pulse. (2017). 3 ways to improve your survey response rates. Retrieved 30 October 2017 from https://www.peoplepulse.com/resources/useful-articles/survey-response-rates/Search in Google Scholar

10. Ruddock, L., Kheir, A., & Ruddock, S. (2014). UK construction companies' strategies in the face of business cycles. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(3), 225–237. Doi: 10.3846/1648715X.2014.92740010.3846/1648715X.2014.927400Search in Google Scholar

11. Rudeviča, E., & Tambovceva, T. (2011). Business implementation opportunities, challenges and solutions for energy service companies (ESCO) in Latvia. Building Entrepreneurship and Real Estate Development, 1,172–187. ISSN 2243-6030.Search in Google Scholar

12. Survey Gizmo. (2017). Survey Response Rates. Tips on how to increase your survey response rates. Retrieved 30 October 2017 from https://www.surveygizmo.com/survey-blog/survey-response-rates/Search in Google Scholar

13. The Analysis Factor. (2017). What is the difference between MAR and MCAR missing data? Retrieved 30 October 2017 from http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/mar-and-mcar-missing-data/Search in Google Scholar

14. University of Texas at Austin. (2011). Assess teaching: Response rates (2011). Retrieved 3 August 2016 from http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/teaching/gather/method/survey-Response.phpSearch in Google Scholar