[Andrews, S., Hersch, J., 2010. Lexical Precision in Skilled Readers: Individual Differences in Masked Neighbor Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 139(2), 299—318, available at: <https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-08363-005>.10.1037/a0018366]Search in Google Scholar
[Clarkson, L., Roodenrys, S., Miller, L. M. et al., 2017. The phonological neighbourhood effect on short-term memory for order. Memory (Hove, England), 25(3), 391–402, available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09658211.2016.1179330>.10.1080/09658211.2016.1179330]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, R., Cuetos, F. Glez-Seijas, R. M., 2007. Reading development and dyslexia in a transparent orthography: a survey of Spanish children. Annals of Dyslexia, 57(2), 179-198, avaiable at <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-007-0010-1>.10.1007/s11881-007-0010-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, C. J., 2005. N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65–70, available at: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03206399>.10.3758/BF03206399]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., Brysbaert, M., 2004. Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 43–67, available at: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691803001070?casa_token=-ArqcT_1ylcAAAAA:-y3eWbRpkc8laz8k3XLb-87C8A1VHEeiY-xeRXDL_isqbnXAUfItOupU9aJE38OvXLx3B2Kng-Q>.10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[González-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., Rodríguez-Fereiro J. et al., 2014. Effects of the psycholinguistic variables on the lexical decision task in Spanish: A study with 2,765 words. Behavior Research Methods. 46(2), 517–525, available at: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-013-0383-5>.10.3758/s13428-013-0383-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Grainger, J., 2017. Orthographic Processing: a „Mid-Level“ Vision of Reading. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 71(2), 1–72, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315802243_Orthographic_Processing_a_Mid-Level_Vision_of_Reading>.10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515]Search in Google Scholar
[Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F. et al., 2005. Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 58(6), 981–998, available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724980443000386>10.1080/02724980443000386]Search in Google Scholar
[Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., 2016. Reading disorders and dyslexia. Current opinion in pediatrics, 28(6), 731–735, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411>.10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411]Search in Google Scholar
[Jirásková, M., 2019. Dyslexie ve speciálněpedagogickém a neurovědeckém pojetí se zaměřením na fonologické zpracování, Diploma thesis, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Olomouc, The Czech Republic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Juhasz, B. J., Yap, M. J., Raoul, A., Kaye, M., 2019. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 82–96, available at: <https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-17903-001>.10.1037/xlm0000564]Search in Google Scholar
[Karanth, P., 2004. Cross-linguistic study of acquired reading disorders. Springer US, available at: <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,url,uid&db=edseul&AN=edseul.3000072674760&lang=cs&site=eds-live>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Křen, M., Cvrček, V., Čapka, T. et al., 2015. SYN2015: reprezentativní korpus psané češtiny. Ústav Čes kého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha, available at: <http://www.korpus.cz>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laxon, V., Gallagher A., Masterson, J. 2002. The effects of familiarity, orthographic neighbourhood density, letter-length and graphemic complexity on children’s reading accuracy. British journal of psychology. 93(2), 269–287, available at: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1348/000712602162580?casa_token=TA24rf7Qj7YAAAAA:mz47UkE-jlWV4nEkr-pr5w2jzW4FyBmGp-xrHXKDgVMc1s8pA9IyzqN-40x5ArCabFPvDr05qO2sH0Lc4>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S. et al., 2012. Clearpond: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities. PLoS ONE. 7(8), 1–11, available at <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3423352/>.10.1371/journal.pone.0043230]Search in Google Scholar
[Penolazzi, B., Spironelli C., Angrilli, A., 2009. Children and Language: Development, Impairment and Training. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 113–145. ISBN 9781606923955.]Search in Google Scholar
[Share, D. L., 2008. On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an „outlier“ orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615, available at: <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c063/7a40368398bdaaa93304e97d90b-2c233c93a.pdf>.10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584]Search in Google Scholar
[Schloss, B. J., 2017. Predicting Concept Evolution during Naturalistic Reading with Simultaneous Eye-tracking and fMRI, Master thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schroeter, P., Schroeder, S., 2014. Differences in visual word recognition between L1 and L2 speakers the impact of length, frequency, and orthographic neighborhood size in German children. Studies in second language acquisition. 40(2), 319–339, available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320455116_DIFFERENCES_IN_VISUAL_WORD_RECOGNITION_BETWEEN_L1_AND_L2_SPEAKERS>.10.1017/S0272263117000201]Search in Google Scholar
[Šmerk, P., 2007. Fast Morphological Analysis of Czech. In Sojka P., Horák A. (Eds.), Proceedings of Third Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2009. Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 13–16. ISBN 978-80-210-5048-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weekes, B., Castles, A., Davies, R., 2006. Effects of Consistency and Age of Acquisition on Reading and Spelling among Developing Readers. Reading. 19(2), 133–169, available at: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11145-005-2032-6>.10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., Yap, M., 2008. Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin 15(5), 971-979, available at: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971>.10.3758/PBR.15.5.971]Search in Google Scholar