Productive perils: on metaphor as a theory-building device

[1] Black, M., 1955. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 5, 273–294.10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273Search in Google Scholar

[2] Boyd, R., 1993. *Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 481–532.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kuhn, T. S., 1993. Metaphor in science. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition. Cambridge [England]; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 533–542.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.024Search in Google Scholar

[4] Brown, T. L., 2003. The metaphorical foundations of chemical explanation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 988(1), 209–216.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb06100.xSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Trčková, D., 2014. Representations of natural catastrophes in newspaper discourse. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.Search in Google Scholar

[6] English, K., 1998. Understanding science: When metaphors become terms. ASp, 19–22, 151–163.10.4000/asp.2800Search in Google Scholar

[7] Núñez, R. E., Lakoff, G., 2000. Where mathematics comes from. How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

[8] van Rijn-van Tongeren, G. W., 1997. Metaphors in medical texts. Utrecht studies in language and communication. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004490260Search in Google Scholar

[9] Greenwood, J., Bonner, A., 2008. The role of theory-constitutive metaphor in nursing science. Nursing Philosophy, 9, 154–168.10.1111/j.1466-769X.2008.00340.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Taylor, C., Dewsbury, B. M., 2018. On the problem and promise of metaphor use in science and science communication. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1).10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1538Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gentner, D., Wolff, P., 2000. Metaphor and knowledge change. In Dietrich, E., Markman, A. B. (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295–342.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Black, M., 1962. Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501741326Search in Google Scholar

[13] Lotman, J., 2011. The place of art among other modelling systems. Sign Systems Studies, 39(2/4), 249.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.10Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sebeok, T. A., 2001. Signs: an introduction to semiotics. Toronto studies in semiotics and communication, 2nd edition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Sonesson, G., 2015. Bats out of the belfry: The nature of metaphor, with special attention to pictorial metaphors. Signs and Media, 11, 74–104.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Loewenberg, I., 1975. Identifying metaphors. Foundations of Language, 12(3), 315–338.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kittay, E. F., 1984. The identification of metaphor. Synthese, 58(2), 153–202.10.1007/BF03055304Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Steen, G., 2002. Identifying metaphor in language: A cognitive approach. Style, 36(3), 386–406.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Salupere, S., 2011. Semiotics as science. Sign Systems Studies, 39(2/4), 271.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.11Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kull, K., 2010. Umwelt and modelling. In Cobley, P. (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 43–56.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lotman, J., 2005. On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 205–229.10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.09Search in Google Scholar

[22] Nöth, W., 2006. Yuri Lotman on metaphors and culture as self-referential semiospheres. Semiotica, 161, 249–263.10.1515/SEM.2006.065Search in Google Scholar

[23] Remm, T., 2010. Time in spatial metalanguage: The ambiguous position of time in concepts of sociocultural, social and cultural space. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(4), 394.10.3176/tr.2010.4.07Search in Google Scholar

[24] Emmeche, C., Hoffmeyer, J., 2009. From language to nature: The semiotic metaphor in biology. Semiotica, 84(1-2), 1–42.10.1515/semi.1991.84.1-2.1Search in Google Scholar

[25] Markoš, A., Faltýnek, D., 2011. Language metaphors of life. Biosemiotics, 4(2), 171–200.10.1007/s12304-010-9097-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Barbieri, M., 2008. Biosemiotics: A new understanding of life. Naturwis- senschaften, 95(7), 577–599.10.1007/s00114-008-0368-xSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Kull, K., Deacon, T., Emmeche, C., Stjernfelt, F., Hoffmeyer, J., 2009. Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory, 4(2), 167–173.10.1162/biot.2009.4.2.167Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kull, K., 2002. A sign is not alive – A text is. Sign Systems Studies, 30(1), 327–336.10.12697/SSS.2002.30.1.21Search in Google Scholar

[29] Barbieri, M., 2008. Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6340-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Kull, K., 1999. Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: A view from biology. Semiotica, 127(1–4), 385–414.10.1515/semi.1999.127.1-4.385Search in Google Scholar

[31] Barbieri, M., 2018. What is code biology? Biosystems, 164, 1–10.10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[32] Barbieri, M., 2013. Organic Semiosis and Peircean Semiosis. Biosemiotics, 6(2), 273–289.10.1007/s12304-012-9161-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[33] Cannizzaro, S., 2013. Where did information go? Reflections on the logical status of information in a cybernetic and semiotic perspective. Biosemiotics, 6(1), 105–123.10.1007/s12304-012-9154-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[34] Santaella Braga, L., 1999. A new causality for the understanding of the living. Semiotica, 127(1–4), 497–520.10.1515/semi.1999.127.1-4.497Search in Google Scholar

[35.] Nöth, W., 2014. The life of symbols and other legisigns: More than a mere metaphor. In Romanini, V., Fernández, E. (Eds.), Peirce and biosemiotics: A guess at the riddle of life, volume 11 of Biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 171–181.10.1007/978-94-007-7732-3_9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Houser, N., 2014. The intelligible universe. In Romanini, V., Fernández, E. (Eds.), Peirce and biosemiotics: A guess at the riddle of life, volume 11 of Biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 9–32.10.1007/978-94-007-7732-3_2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Nöth, W., 2014. The growth of signs. Sign Systems Studies, 42(2–3), 172.10.12697/SSS.2014.42.2-3.02Search in Google Scholar

[38] Idone Cassone, V., 2014. Sull’uso metaforico dei giochi nella teoria semiotica. E|C – Rivista dell’Associazione Italiana Studi Semiotici.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Eco, U., 1983. The scandal of metaphor: Metaphorology and semiotics. Poetics Today, 4(2), 217–257.10.2307/1772287Search in Google Scholar

[40] Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., 2010. Experimental semiotics: A new approach for studying the emergence and the evolution of human communication. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 1–13.10.1075/is.11.1.01galOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[41] Petrilli, S., Ponzio, A., 2007. Semiotics today. From global semiotics to semioethics, a dialogic response. Signs, 1, 29–127.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Brown, J. R., 2012. Platonism, naturalism, and mathematical knowledge, volume 10 of Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Stjernfelt, F., 2013. The generality of signs: The actual relevance of anti- psychologism. Semiotica, 194, 77–109.10.1515/sem-2013-0023Search in Google Scholar