Representational Systems in Zoosemiotics and Anthroposemiotics Part II: On Meta-Representation and Human Language

[1] Harris, R.A., 1995. The linguistics wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chomsky, N., 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.10.1037/e400082009-004Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chomsky, N., 1980. Rules and representations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.10.1017/S0140525X00001515Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chomsky, N., 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Pinker, S., 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Pinker, S., 1995. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Berwick, R.C., 1985. The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1074.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[9] Lightfoot, D., 1982. The language lottery: Toward a biology of grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[10] van der Hulst, H., 2010. Re recursion. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Germany: Mouton de Gruyter10.1515/9783110219258Search in Google Scholar

[11] van der Hulst, H., 2010. A note on recursion in phonology. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–300.10.1515/9783110219258Search in Google Scholar

[12] van der Hulst, H. (Ed.) 2010. Recursion and human language. Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219258Search in Google Scholar

[13] Karlsson, F., 2010. Recursion and iteration. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Recursion and human language. Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43–68.10.1515/9783110219258.43Search in Google Scholar

[14] Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J., Gibson, E., et al., 2010. How recursive is language? A Bayesian exploration. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), 2010. Recursion and human language. Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 159–178.10.1515/9783110219258.159Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jackendoff, R., 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jackendoff, R., 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Bever, T.G., 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J.R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley and Sons, pp. 279–362.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.) 1981. The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 364.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Umiker-Sebeok, J., Sebeok, T.A. (Eds.) 1980. Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4613-3012-7Search in Google Scholar

[20] Terrace, H., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J., et al., 1979. Can an ape create a sentence? Science, 206 4421, 891–902.10.1126/science.504995Search in Google Scholar

[21] Terrace, H., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J., et al., 1980. On the grammatical capacity of apes. In Nelson, K. (Ed.), Children’s language, vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press, pp. 371–495.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Terrace, H., Petitto, L.A., Sanders, R.J., et al., 1981. Ape language. Science, 211, 87–88.10.1126/science.7444455Search in Google Scholar

[23] Premack, D., 1983. The codes of man and beasts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 125–37.10.1017/S0140525X00015077Search in Google Scholar

[24] Premack, D., 1984. Possible general effects of language training on the Chimpanzee. Human Development, 27, 268–281.10.1159/000272921Search in Google Scholar

[25] Premack, D., 1988. Minds with and without language. In Weiskrantz, L. (Ed.), Thought without language. A Fyssen Foundation Symposium. New York: Calderon Press, 46–65.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Seidenberg, M.S., Petitto, L.A., 1979. Signing behavior in apes: A critical review. Cognition, 7, 177–215.10.1016/0010-0277(79)90019-2Search in Google Scholar

[27] Seidenberg, M.S., Petitto, L.A., 1981. Ape signing: Problems of method and interpretation. In Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.), The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 364, pp. 94–114.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sebeok, T.A., 1980. Looking in the destination for what should have been sought in the source. In Umiker-Sebeok, J., Sebeok, T.A. (Eds.), Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. Berlin: Springer, pp. 407–428.10.1007/978-1-4613-3012-7_20Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sebeok, T.A., 1981. The ultimate enigma of “Clever Hans”: The union of nature and culture. In Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.), The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 364, pp. 199–205.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb34473.xSearch in Google Scholar

[30] Wallman, J., 1992. Aping language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611858Search in Google Scholar

[31] Anderson, S.R., 2004. Doctor Dolittle’s delusion: Animals and the uniqueness of human language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Tomasello, M.E., 1994. Can an ape understand a sentence? A review of language comprehension in ape and child by E. D. Savage-Rumbaugh et al. Language and Communication, 14, 377–390.10.1016/0271-5309(94)90027-2Search in Google Scholar

[33] Tomasello, M.E., 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674044371Search in Google Scholar

[34] Tomasello, M.E., 2007. If They’re so good at grammar, Then why don’t they talk? Hind from apes’ and humans’ use of gestures. Language, Learning and Development, 3, 133–156.10.1080/15475440701225451Search in Google Scholar

[35] Pinker, S., 1994. How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics? Lingua, 92, 377–410.10.1016/0024-3841(94)90347-6Search in Google Scholar

[36] Passingham, R.E., 1979. Specialization and the language areas. In Steklis, H., Raleigh, M.J. (Eds.), Neurobiology of social communication in primates. New York: Academic Press, pp. 221–256.10.1016/B978-0-12-665650-3.50014-1Search in Google Scholar

[37] Anderson, S.R., Lightfoot, D.W., 2002. The language organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613869Search in Google Scholar

[38] Gleitman, L.R., Gleitman, H., Landau, B., et al., 1988. Where learning begins: Initial representations for langage learning. In Newmeyer, F.J. (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey vol. III. Language: Psychological and biological aspects. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150–193.10.1017/CBO9780511621062.007Search in Google Scholar

[39] Gleitman, L.R., 1986. Biological dispositions to learn language. In Demopoulos, W., Madras, A. (Eds.), Language leasing and koncept acquisition: Foundational issues. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 3–28.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Bowerman, M., 1973. Early syntactic development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Clark, H.H., Clark, E.V., 1977. Psychology and language. New York: Hartcourt Brace.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Cromer, R., 1981. Reconceptualizing language acquisition and cognitive development. In Scheifelbusch, R.L., Bricker, D.D. (Eds.), 1981. Early language: Acquisition and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, pp. 53–102.Search in Google Scholar

[43] de Villiers, J.G., de Villiers, P.A., 1978. Early language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674331495Search in Google Scholar

[44] Newport, E.L., Gletiman, H., Gleitman, L.R., 1977. Mother, i’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C.E., Ferguson, C.A. (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–149.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Josse, G., Mazoyer, B., Crivello, F., et al., 2003. Left planum temporale: An anatomical marker of left hemispheric specialization for language comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(1), 1–14.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[46] Josse, G., Hervé, P., Crivello, F., et al., 2006. Hemispheric specialization for language: Brain volume matters. Brain Research, 1068(1), 184–193.10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.037Search in Google Scholar

[47] Josse, G., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., 2004. Hemispheric specialization for language. Brain Research Reviews, 44(1), 1–12.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[48] Witelson, S.F., 1977. Anatomic asymmetry in the temporal lobes: Its documentation, phylogenesis and relationship to functional asymmetry. In Diamond, S.J., Blizard, D.A. (Eds.), Evolution and lateralization of the brain. Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 299, pp. 328–354.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb41920.xSearch in Google Scholar

[49] Chomsky, N., 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Boeckx, C., 2006. Linguistic minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods and aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0018Search in Google Scholar

[51] Boeckx, C. (Ed.) 2006. Minimalist essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.91Search in Google Scholar

[52] Al-Mutairi, F.R., 2014. The minimalist program: The nature and plausibility of Chomsky’s biolinguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139649551Search in Google Scholar

[53] Berwick, R.C., Chomsky, N., 2016. Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[54] Chomsky, N., 1999. Derivation by phase. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., Fitch, T., 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 2985598, 1569–1579.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569Search in Google Scholar

[56] Fitch, T., Hauser, M., 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a Nonhuman primate. Science, 303(56), 377–380.10.1126/science.1089401Search in Google Scholar

[57] Hauser, M., Fitch, T., 2003. What are the uniquely human components of the language faculty? In Christiansen, M., Kirby, S. (Eds.), Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 158–181.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

[58] Fitch, T., Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179–210.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005Search in Google Scholar

[59] Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S.E., et al., 2002. Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature, 4186900, 869–872.10.1038/nature01025Search in Google Scholar

[60] Vargha-Khadem, F., Watkins, K., Alcock, K., et al., 1995. Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(3), 930–933.10.1073/pnas.92.3.930Search in Google Scholar

[61] Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D.G., Copp, A., et al., 2005. FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(2), 131–138.10.1038/nrn1605Search in Google Scholar

[62] MacDermot, K.D., Bonora, E., Sykes, N., et al., 2005. Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech and language deficits. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 76(6), 1074–1080.10.1086/430841Search in Google Scholar

[63] Krause, J., Alueza-Fox, C., Orlando, L., et al., 2007. The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals. Current Biology, 17(21), 1908–1912.10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.008Search in Google Scholar

[64] Christiansen, M., Kirby, S. (Eds.) 2003. Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[65] Di Sciullo, A.M., Boeckx, C. (Eds.) 2011. The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[66] Pinker, S., Jackendoff, R., 2005. The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201–236.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[67] Jackendoff, R., Pinker, S., 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97(2), 211–225.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006Search in Google Scholar

[68] Fitch, T., 2011. “Deep homology” in the biology and evolution of language. In Di Sciullo, A.M., Boeckx, C. (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–168.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Sebeok, T.A. (Ed.) 1977. How animals communicate. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[70] Witzany, G. (Ed.) 2014. Biocommunication of animals. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7414-8Search in Google Scholar

[71] Maynard-Smith, J.,; Harper, D., 2003. Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T028974Search in Google Scholar

[72] Marler, P., 1984. Animal communication: Affect or cognition? In Scherer, K.R., Ekman, P. (Eds.), Approaches to emotion. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 345–65.Search in Google Scholar

[73] Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L., 1982. How Monkeys see the world: Areview of recent research on East African Vervet Monkeys. In Snowdon, C.T., Brown, C.H., Petersen, M.R. (Eds.), Primate communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–52.Search in Google Scholar

[74] Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L., 1986. Vocal development in vervet Monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1640–58.10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80252-4Search in Google Scholar

[75] Zuberbühler, K., 2002. A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication. Animal Behaviour, 63(2), 293–299.10.1006/anbe.2001.1914Search in Google Scholar

[76] Marler, P., 1977. The evolution of communication. In Sebeok, T.A. (Ed.), How animals communicate. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 45–70.Search in Google Scholar

[77] Demers, R.A., 1988. Linguistics and animal communication. In Newmeyer, F.J. (Ed.), Linguistics: The cambridge survey vol. III. Language: Psychological and biological aspects. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 314–335.10.1017/CBO9780511621062.013Search in Google Scholar

[78] Rendall, D., Owren, M.J., 2013. Communication without meaning or information: Abandoning language-based and informational constructs in animal communication theory. In Stegmann, U.E. (Ed.), Animal communication theory: Information and influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–188.10.1017/CBO9781139003551.010Search in Google Scholar

[79] Haven Wiley, R., 2013. Communication as a transfer of information: Measurement, mechanism and meaning. In Stegmann, U.E. (Ed.), Animal communication theory: Information and influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 113-132.10.1017/CBO9781139003551.007Search in Google Scholar

[80] Bowling, D.L., Fitch, W.T., 2015. Do animal communication systems have phonemes? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.01110.1016/j.tics.2015.08.011Search in Google Scholar

[81] Yip, M.J., 2006. The search for phonology in other species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 442–446.10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[82] Marler, P., 2000. Origins of music and speech: Insights from animals. In Wallin, N., Merker, B., Brown, S. (Eds.) The origins of music. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 31–48.Search in Google Scholar

[83] Barton, R.A., Dunbar, R., 1997. Evolution of the social brain. In Byrne, R., Whiten, A. (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–263.10.1017/CBO9780511525636.010Search in Google Scholar

[84] Petrides, M., 2013. Neuroanatomy of language regions of the human brain. Elsevier: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

[85] Ardila, A., Ostrosky-Solis, F. (Eds.) 1989. Brain organization of language and cognitive processes. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Company.10.1007/978-1-4613-0799-0Search in Google Scholar

[86] Breznitz, Z. (Ed.) 2007. Brain research in language. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-74980-8Search in Google Scholar

[87] Schnelle, H., 2010. Language in the brain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[88] Lamb, S.M., 1999. Pathways of the brain: The neurocognitive basis of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cilt.170Search in Google Scholar

[89] Pulvermüller, F., 2002. The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615528Search in Google Scholar

[90] Wray, A.J., 1992. The focusing hypothesis: The 49 theory of left hemisphere lateralised language re-examined. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/sspcl.3Search in Google Scholar

[91] Pike, K.L., 1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of structure of human behavior. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.10.1515/9783111657158Search in Google Scholar

[92] Bloom, P., 2000. How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3577.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[93] Taylor, C., 2016. The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674970250Search in Google Scholar

[94] Lieberman, P., 2013. The unpredictable species: What makes humans unique. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400846702Search in Google Scholar

[95] Jackendoff, R., 1987. The status of thematic roles in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 369–411.Search in Google Scholar

[96] Saffran, E.M., Schwartz, M.F., Linebarger, M.C., 1998. Semantic influences on thematic role assignment: Evidence from normals and aphasics. Brain and Language, 62(2), 255–297.10.1006/brln.1997.1918Search in Google Scholar

[97] Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., Comrie, B., et al., (Eds.) 2006. Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological, and psycholinguistic perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110219272Search in Google Scholar

[98] Luraghi, S., Narrog, H. (Eds.) 2014. Perspectives on semantic roles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.106Search in Google Scholar

[99] Terrace, H.S., 1979. Nim: A Chimapnzee who learned sign language. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

[100] Terrace, H.S., 1979. How Nim Chimpsky changed my mind. Psychology Today, November 1979, pp. 65–76Search in Google Scholar

[101] Terrace, H.S., 1980. More on Monkey talk: Response to Patterson ‘ s rejoinder to Martin Gardners review of Nim and speaking of apes. New York Review of Books, 4 December 1980, p. 59.Search in Google Scholar

[102] Terrace, H.S., 1981. A report to the academy, 1980. In Sebeok, T.A., Rosenthal, R. (Eds.), The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 364, pp. 94–114.Search in Google Scholar

[103] Terrace., 1984Search in Google Scholar

[104] Bowerman, M., 1990. Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics, 28(6), 1253–1289.10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1253Search in Google Scholar

[105] Noble, C.H., Rowland, C.F., Pine, J.M., 2011. Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: Evidence from english-learning children and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35(5), 963–982.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01175.xSearch in Google Scholar

[106] Deffler, S.A., Fox, C., Ogle, C.M., et al., 2016. All my children: The roles of semantic category and phonetic similarity in the misnaming of familiar individuals. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 989–99.10.3758/s13421-016-0613-zSearch in Google Scholar

[107] Brooks, P., Tomasello, M., 1999. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75(4), 720–738.10.2307/417731Search in Google Scholar

[108] Theakston, A.L., 2012. “The spotty cow tickled the pig with a curly tail”: How do sentence position, preferred argument structure, and referential complexity affect children’s and adults’ choice of referring expression? Applied Psycholinguistics (04), 691–724.10.1017/S0142716411000531Search in Google Scholar

[109] McClure, K., Pine, J.M., Lieven, E.V.M., 2006. Investigating the abstractness of children’s early knowledge of argument structure. Journal of Child Language, 33(04), 693–720.10.1017/S0305000906007525Search in Google Scholar

[110] Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J.M., et al., 2015. When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 1–15.10.1016/j.jml.2014.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[111] Naigles, L.R., Lehrer, N., 2002. Languagegeneral and language-specific influences on children’s acquisition of argument structure: A comparison of French and English. Journal of Child Language, 29(03), 545–566.10.1017/S0305000902005159Search in Google Scholar

[112] Braine, M.D.S., Brody, R.E., Fisch, S.M., et al., 1990. Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure? Journal of Child Language, 17(02), 313–342.10.1017/S0305000900013799Search in Google Scholar

[113] Naigles, L.R., Maltempo, A., 2011. Verb argument structure acquisition in young children: Defining a role for discourse. Journal of Child Language, 38(03), 662–674.10.1017/S0305000910000334Search in Google Scholar

[114] Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures, Second Edition 2002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

[115] Kako, E., 1999. Elements of syntax in the systems of three language-trained animals. Learning & Behavior, 27(1), 1–14.10.3758/BF03199424Search in Google Scholar

[116] Powers, S., 2001. A minimalist approach to phrase structure acquisition. In Alexandrova, G.M., Arnaudova, O. (Eds.), The minimalist parameter: Selected papers from the open linguistics forum, Ottawa, 21–23 March 1997, pp. 33–50.10.1075/cilt.192.04powSearch in Google Scholar

[117] Fodor, J.D., Crain, S., 1987. Simplicity and generality of rules in language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 35–64.Search in Google Scholar

[118] Friederici, A.D., 1983. Children’s sensitivity to function words during sentence comprehension. Linguistics, 21(5), 717–739.10.1515/ling.1983.21.5.717Search in Google Scholar

[119] Maloney, E.M., Payne, D.L., Redford, M.A., 2012. What children’s pause patterns indicate about their constituent structure. In BUCLD 36 Proceedings Supplement. Boston, MA.Search in Google Scholar

[120] Taeschner, T., Devescovi, A., Volterra, V., 1988. Affixes and function words in the written language of deaf children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9(04), 385–401.10.1017/S0142716400008079Search in Google Scholar

[121] Schlaggar, B.L., 2002. Functional neuroanatomical differences between adults and school-age children in the processing of single words. Science, 2965572, 1476–1479.10.1126/science.1069464Search in Google Scholar

[122] Gass, S., Ard, J., 1980. L2 data: Their relevance for language universals. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly, 14(4), 443–452.10.2307/3586233Search in Google Scholar

[123] Gaer, E.P., 1969. Children’s understanding and production of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 289–294.10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80078-2Search in Google Scholar

[124] Karlsson, F., 2007. Constraints on multiple centerembedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43(2), 365–392.10.1017/S0022226707004616Search in Google Scholar

[125] Clark, A., Lappin, S., 2011. Linguistic nativism and the poverty of the stimulus. Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444390568Search in Google Scholar

[126] Laurence, S., Margolis, E., 2001. The poverty of the stimulus argument. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 217–276.10.1093/bjps/52.2.217Search in Google Scholar

[127] Berwick, R.C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G.J.L., et al., 2011. Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 113–121.10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[128] Berwick, R.C., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., et al., 2011. Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1207–1242.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.xSearch in Google Scholar

[129] Vallauri, E.L., 2004. The relation between mind and language: The innateness hypothesis and the poverty of the stimulus. The Linguistic Review, 21(3), 345–387.10.1515/tlir.2004.21.3-4.345Search in Google Scholar

[130] Lidz, J., Waxman, S., 2004. Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: A reply to the replies. Cognition, 93(2), 157–165.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[131] Legate, J.A., Yang, C.D., 2002. Empirical reassessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18(1–2), 151–162.10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.151Search in Google Scholar

[132] Fodor, J.D., Crowther, C., 2002. Understanding stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18(1–2), 106–145.10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.105Search in Google Scholar

[133] Thomas, M., 2002. Development of the concept of “the poverty of the stimulus”. The Linguistic Review, 18(1-2), 51–71.10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.51Search in Google Scholar

[134] Pullum, G.K., Scholz, B.C., 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 18(1–2), 9–50.10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.9Search in Google Scholar

[135] Lasnik, H., Uriagereka, J., 2002. On the poverty of the challenge. The Linguistic Review, 18(1–2), 147–150.10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.147Search in Google Scholar

[136] Limber, J., 1977. Language in child and chimp? American Psychologist, 32, 280–95.10.1037/0003-066X.32.4.280Search in Google Scholar

[137] Redshaw, M., 1978. Cognitive development in humans and gorilla infants. Journal of Human Evolution, 7, 133–141.10.1016/S0047-2484(78)80005-0Search in Google Scholar

[138] Greenfield, P.M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S.E., 1993. Comparing communicative competence in child and chimp: The pragmatics of repetition. Journal of Child Language, 20, 1–26.10.1017/S0305000900009090Search in Google Scholar

[139] Dalby, M.A., 1977. Aetiological studies in language retarded children. Neuropediatrics, 8(1), 499–500.10.1055/s-0028-1091553Search in Google Scholar

[140] Prior, M.R., Frolley, M., Sanson, A., 1983. Language lateralization in specific reading retarded children and backward readers. Cortex, 19(2), 149–163.10.1016/S0010-9452(83)80011-2Search in Google Scholar

[141] Fowler, A.E., 1984. Language Acquisition of Down’s Syndrome Children: Production and Comprehension. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar

[142] Paul, R., Dykens, E., Leckman, J.F., et al., 1987. A comparison of language characteristics of mentally retarded adults with fragile X syndrome and those with nonspecific mental retardation and autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17(4), 457–468.10.1007/BF01486963Search in Google Scholar

[143] Abbeduto, L., Boudreau, D., 2004. Theoretical influences on research on language development and intervention in individuals with mental retardation. Development Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(3), 184–192.10.1002/mrdd.20032Search in Google Scholar

[144] Fedor, A., Ittzés, P., Szathmáry, E., 2009. The biological background of syntax evolution. In Bickerton, D., Szathmáry, E. (Eds.), Biological foundations and origin of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15–40.Search in Google Scholar

[145] Bishop, D.V.M., 2009. What can developmental language impairment tell us about the genetic bases of syntax? In Bickerton, D., Szathmáry, E. (Eds.), Biological foundations and origin of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 185–206.Search in Google Scholar

[146] Dediu, D., Ladd, D., 2007. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency ofthe adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, Microcephalin and ASPM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(26), pp. 10944–10949.10.1073/pnas.0610848104Search in Google Scholar

[147] Woods, C.G., Bond, J., Enard, W., 2005. Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH): A review of clinical, molecular, and evolutionary findings. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 76(5), 717–728.10.1086/429930Search in Google Scholar

[148] Lenneberg, E.H., 1967. Biological foundation of language. New York: John Wiley.10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799Search in Google Scholar

[149] Grela, B.G., 2003. Do children with Down syndrome have difficulty with argument structure? Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(4), 263–279.10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00014-5Search in Google Scholar

[150] Pepperberg, I., 1983. Cogniton in the African Grey Parrot: Preliminary evidence for auditory/vocal comprehension of the class concept. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11, 175–85.10.3758/BF03199646Search in Google Scholar

[151] Pepperberg, I., 1987. Acquisition of the same/different concept by an African Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Learning with respect to categories of color, shape, and material. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15, 423–432.10.3758/BF03205051Search in Google Scholar

[152] Pepperberg, I., 1987. Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African Grey Parrot: Labeling of cardinal sets. Ethology, 75, 37–61.10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00641.xSearch in Google Scholar

[153] Pepperberg, I., 1990. Conceptual abilities of some nonprimate species, with an emphasis on an African Grey Parrot. In: Parker, S.T., Gibson, K.R. (Eds.), „Language“ and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 469–507.10.1017/CBO9780511665486.020Search in Google Scholar

[154] Pepperberg, I., 1990. Cognition in an African Gray Parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Further evidence for comprehension of categories and labels. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104(1), pp. 41–52.10.1037/0735-7036.104.1.41Search in Google Scholar

[155] Shettleworth, S.J., 2010. Cognition, evolution and behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[156] Dapretto, M., Bookheimer, S.Y., 1999. Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron, 24(2), 427–432.10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80855-7Search in Google Scholar

[157] Wright, P., Stamatakis, E.A., Tyler, L.K., 2012. Differentiating hemispheric contributions to syntax and semantics in patients with lefthemisphere lesions. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(24), 8149–8157.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0485-12.2012Search in Google Scholar

[158] Ullman, M.T., 2001. A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 717–726.10.1038/35094573Search in Google Scholar

[159] Miozzo, M., Fischer-Baum, S., Postman, J.A., 2010. A selective deficit for inflection production. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2427–2436.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[160] Połczyńska, M., Curtiss, S., Walshaw, P., et al., 2014. Grammar tests increase the ability to lateralize language function in the Wada test. Epilepsy Research, 108(10), 1864–1873.10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.09.014Search in Google Scholar

[161] Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A.D.F., et al., 2005. Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 26(1), pp. 221–233.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.032Search in Google Scholar

[162] Menenti, L., Gierhan, S.M.E., Segaert, K., et al., 2011. Shared language: Overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1173–1182.10.1177/0956797611418347Search in Google Scholar

[163] Dronkers, N.F., Wilkins, D.P., Van Valin R.D.Jr., et al., 2004. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition, 92(1–2), 145–177.10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.002Search in Google Scholar

[164] Yamada, Y., Neville, H.J., 2007. An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences. Brain Research, 1130, 167–180.10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.052Search in Google Scholar

[165] Batterink, L., Neville, H.J., 2013. The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8528–8533.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0618-13.2013Search in Google Scholar

[166] Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., Hasting, A.S., et al., 2008. Syntax as a reflex: Neurophysiological evidence for early automaticity of grammatical processing. Brain and Language, 104(3), 244–253.10.1016/j.bandl.2007.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[167] Pulvermüller, F., Assadollahi, R., 2007. Grammar or serial order? Discrete combinatorial brain mechanisms reflected by the syntactic mismatch negativity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(6), 971–980.10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.971Search in Google Scholar

[168] Sauerland, U., Gärtner, H.M. (Eds.) 2007. Interfaces + recursion = language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

[169] Terrace., 1983Search in Google Scholar

[170] Rowe, D.L., Cooper, N.J., Liddell, B.J., et al., 2007. Brain Structure and Function Correlates of general and social cognition. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 06(01), 35–74.10.1142/S021963520700143XSearch in Google Scholar

[171] Atkinson, A.P., Wheeler, M., 2004. The grain of domains: The evolutionary-psychological case against domain-general cognition. Mind & Language, 19(2), 147–176.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00252.xSearch in Google Scholar

[172] Deaner, R.O., van Schaik, C.P., Johnson, V., 2006. Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of Nonhuman primate studies. Evolutionary Psychology, 4(1), 149–196.10.1177/147470490600400114Search in Google Scholar

[173] Geary, D.C., 2004. Origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association (APA).10.1037/10871-000Search in Google Scholar

[174] Roberts, M.J. (Ed.) 2007. Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

[175] Martindale, C., Covello, E., West, A., 1986. Primary process cognition and hemispheric asymmetry. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147(1), 79–87.10.1080/00221325.1986.9914482Search in Google Scholar

[176] Pulvermüller, F., Kherif, F., Hauk, O., et al., 2009. Distributed cell assemblies for general lexical and category-specific semantic processing as revealed by fMRI cluster analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(12), 3837–3850.10.1002/hbm.20811Search in Google Scholar

[177] Loring, D.W., Meador, K.J., Lee, G.P., et al., 1992. Amobarbital effects and lateralized brain function: The Wada test. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-2874-5Search in Google Scholar

[178] Abou-Khalil, B., 2007. An update on determination of language dominance in screening for epilepsy surgery: The Wada test and newer noninvasive alternatives. Epilepsia, 48(3), 442–455.10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01012.xSearch in Google Scholar

[179] Doss, R.C., Zhang, W., Risse, G.L., et al., 2009. Lateralizing language with magnetic source imaging: Validation based on the Wada test. Epilepsia, 50(10), 2242–2248.10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02242.xSearch in Google Scholar

[180] Gutbrod, K., Spring, D., Degonda, N., et al., 2012. Determination of language dominance: Wada test and fMRI compared using a novel sentence task. Journal of Neuroimaging, 22(3), 1–9.10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00646.xSearch in Google Scholar

[181] Gazzaniga, M.S., 1980. The role of language for conscious experience: Observations from splitbrain man. Progress in Brain Research, 54, 689–696.10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61691-XSearch in Google Scholar

[182] Levy, J., Trevarthen, C., 1977. Perceptual, semantic and phonetic aspects of elementary language processes in split-brain patients. Brain, 100(1), 105–118.10.1093/brain/100.1.105Search in Google Scholar

[183] Goodman, R.A., Whitaker, H.A., 1985. Hemispherectomy: A review (1928-1981) with special reference to the linguistic abilities and disabilities if the residual right hemisphere. In Best, C.T. (Ed.), Hemispheric function and collaboration in the child. New York: Academic Press, pp. 121–156.Search in Google Scholar

[184] Grabowecky, M., Kingstone, A., 2004. Can semantic information be transferred between hemispheres in the split-brain? Brain and Cognition, 55(2), 310–313.10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.028Search in Google Scholar

[185] Lambert, A.J., 1991. Interhemispheric interaction in the split-brain. Neuropsychologia, 29(10), 941–948.10.1016/0028-3932(91)90058-GSearch in Google Scholar

[186] Kingstone, A., Gazzaniga, M.S., 1995. Subcortical transfer of higher order information: More illusory than real? Neuropsychology, 9(3), 321–328.10.1037/0894-4105.9.3.321Search in Google Scholar

[187] Lambert, A.J., Beard, C.T., Thompson, R.J., 1988. Selective attention, visual laterality, awareness, and perceiving the meaning of parafoveally presented words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(4), 615–652.10.1080/14640748808402291Search in Google Scholar

[188] Linebarger, M.C., Schwartz, M.F., Saffran, E.M., 1983. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in socalled agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13(3), 361–392.10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-XSearch in Google Scholar

[189] Zurif, E., Grodzinsky, Y., 1983. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in agrammatic aphasics: A reply to Linebarger, Schwartz and Saffran. Cognition, 15(1–3), pp. 207–213.10.1016/0010-0277(83)90041-0Search in Google Scholar

[190] Linebarger, M.C., Schwartz, M.F., Saffran, E.M., 1983. Syntactic processing in agrammatism: A reply to Zurif and Grodzinsky. Cognition, 15(1–3), 215–225.10.1016/0010-0277(83)90042-2Search in Google Scholar

[191] Schwartz, M.F., Linebarger, M.C., Saffran, E.M., et al., 1987. Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(2), 85–113.10.1080/01690968708406352Search in Google Scholar

[192] Hinzen, W., 2006. Mind design and minimal syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289257.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[193] Hinzen, W., 2007. An essay on names and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[194] Hinzen, W., 2011. Language and thought. In: Boeckx, C. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chapter 22.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0022Search in Google Scholar

[195] Hinzen, W., 2012. The emergence of complex language. In McFarland, D., Stenning, K., McGonigle-Chalmers, M. (Eds.), The complex mind an interdisciplinary approach. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 243–263.Search in Google Scholar

[196] Hinzen, W., Sheehan, M., 2013. The philosophy of universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654833.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[197] Terrace, H.S., 2005. Metacognition and the evolution of language. In Terrace, H., Metcalfe, J. (Eds.), The Missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–115.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

[198] Forrester, G.S., 2008. A multidimensional approach to investigations of behaviour: Revealing structure in animal communication signals. Animal Behaviour, 76(5), 1749–1760.10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.026Search in Google Scholar

[199] Kauffman, S.A., 2000. Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[200] Boeckx, C., 2009. The nature of merge: Consequences for language, mind and biology. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J., Salaburu, P. (Eds.), Of minds and language: a dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque country. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–57.Search in Google Scholar

[201] Boeckx, C., 2012. The emergence of language, from a biolinguistic point of view. In Tallerman, M., Gibson, K.R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 492–501.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0052Search in Google Scholar

[202] Chomsky, N., 1990. On formalization and formal linguistics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 143–147.10.1007/BF00205534Search in Google Scholar

[203] Jackendoff, R., 1993. Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Search in Google Scholar

[204] Jackendoff, R., 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[205] Jackendoff, R., 2007. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2–22.10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.111Search in Google Scholar

[206] Pinker, S., 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar