Overcoming Dyadic Boundaries: Reading Poetic Experience after the Semiotics and Pragmatism of Charles S. Peirce

[1] Levin, R., 2010. Der Beitrag des Prager Strukturalismus zur Translationswissenschaft. Linguistik und Semiotik der literarischen Übersetzung. Berlin, Frank & Timme Verlag für wissenschaftliche Literatur.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Saussure, F. de., 2013. Cours de linguistique générale. Zweisprachige Ausgabe französischdeutsch mit Einleitung, Anmerkung und Kommentar von Peter Wunderli (Ed.). Tübingen, Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Da Costa e Silva, T., 2018. The logic of design process. Invention and discovery in light of the semiotics of Charles S. Peirce. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.10.1515/9783839443774Search in Google Scholar

[4] Short, T. L., 2007. Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350Search in Google Scholar

[5] Nöth, W., 2000. Handbook der Semiotik. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-03213-3Search in Google Scholar

[6] Eco, U., 1987. The influence of Roman Jakobson on the development of semiotics. Classics of Semiotics. New York: Plenum Press, 109–128.10.1007/978-1-4757-9700-8_5Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jakobson, R., 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (Ed.), Style in language. Massachusetts/New York/London: Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology/John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 350–377.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Cassirer, E., 1962. An Essay on man. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jakobson, R., Pomorska, K., 1988 Dialogues. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Waugh, Linda R., 1980. The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson. Poetics Today, 2(1), 57-82.10.2307/1772352Search in Google Scholar

[11] Da Costa e Silva, T., 2016. A Linguagem Poética do Cinema de Animação. Lisbon: Nova Edições Acadêmicas.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hausman, C., 1989. Metaphor and art. Interactionism and reference in the verbal and nonverbal arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Eco, U., 1968. La Struttura Assente. Milano: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ehrat, J., 2005. Cinema & semiotic. Peirce and film aesthetics, narration, and representation. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442672956Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lotman, Y., 1990. Universe of the mind. A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Peirce, C S., 1897. The logic of relatives. The Monist, 7(2), 161–217.10.5840/monist18977231Search in Google Scholar

[17] Robin, R., 1967. Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Robin, R., 1971. The Peirce papers: A supplementary catalogue. The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7(1), 37–57.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Peirce, C S., 1905. Issues of pragmaticism. The Monist, 15(4), 481–499.10.5840/monist19051544Search in Google Scholar

[20] Zalamea, F., 2010. A categorial-theoretic reading of Peirce’s system: Pragmaticism, continuity, and the existential graphs. In Moore, M. (Ed.), New essays on Peirce’s mathematical philosophy. Chicago/La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 203–234.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Peirce, C S., 1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2. Houser, N., Kloesel, CJW. (Eds.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press, [References are abbreviated as “EP” followed by volume and page numbers].Search in Google Scholar