[Arskaya v. Ukraine, case no 45076/05, ECtHR decision from 5th December 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Budayeva and others v. Russia complaint no 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02, 15343/02, ECtHR decision from 20th March 2008.10.2118/0202-02-TT]Search in Google Scholar
[Carabuela v. Romania, case no 45661/99, ECtHR decision from 13th July 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Çoşelav v. Turkey, complaint no 1413/07, ECtHR decision from 9th October 2012]Search in Google Scholar
[Elli Poluhas Dödsbo v. Sweden, complaint no 61564/00, decision from 17th January 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Esmukhambetov and others v. Russia complaint no 23445/03, decision from 29th March 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Imakayeva v. Russia, complaint no 7615/02, ECtHR decision from 9th November 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[LCB v. Great Britain, case no 14/1997/798/1001, ECtHR decison from 9th June 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCann and others v. the United Kingdom, case no18984/91, ECtHR decision from 27th September 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nencheva and others v. Bulgaria, complaint no 48609/06, ECtHR decision from 18th June 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pannullo and Forte v. France, complaint no 37794/97, decision from 30th October 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[Papapetrou and others v. Greece, case no 17380/09, ECtHR decision from 12th July 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, case no 46477/99, ECtHR decision from 14th March 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretty v. the United Kingdom, complaint no 2346/02, decision from 29th April 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Railean v. Moldavia, case no 23401/04, ECtHR decision 5th January 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solska and Rybicka v. Poland, complaint no 30491/17 and 31083/17, ECtHR decision from 20th September 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tangiyeva v. Russia, complaint no 57935/00, ECtHR decision from 20th November 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tepe v. Turkey, complaint no 27244/95, ECtHR decision from 9th May 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trapeznikova v. Russia, complaint no 21539/02, ECtHR decision from 11th December 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zubayrayev v. Russia, complaint no 67797/01, ECtHR decision from 10th January 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conway H., The Law and the Dead, Nowy Jork 2016.10.4324/9781315867656]Search in Google Scholar
[Czubik P., Consulary Activity Regarding Transfrontier Transfer of Dead Bodies-Analysis of Basic Regulations Against Action Taken after the Smolensk Catastrophe Concerning the Prohibition of Opening Coffins, “Polski Rocznik Praw Człowieka i Prawa Humanitarnego” nr 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gryglewski R. W., Mummification of Human Body in History, Customs and Medical Science, Kraków 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[H-J. Kim, D. van Alphen, M. Tidball-Binz, Geneva, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Human Rights. International Documents, ed. B. Gronowska, T. Jasudowicz, C. Mik, Toruń 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jasudowicz T. in: Legal Aspect of Smolensk Tragedy.Texts and Materials, Toruń 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Management of Dead Bodies after Disasters: A Field Manual for First Responders, ed. S. Cordner, R. Coninx]Search in Google Scholar
[Olyan S. M.; Theorizing Circumstantially Dependent Rites in and out of War Contexts, in: Warfare, Ritual, and Symbol in Biblical and Modern Contexts, ed. B.E. Kelle, F. Ritchel Ames, J.L. Wright, Atlanta 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schabas W.A., The European Convention on Human Rights A Commentary, Oxford 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Synowiec-Piłat M., Thanatopraxis in Poland as the Harbinger of a New Attitude towards Bodies of the Dead., Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, nr 814, Nauki Humanistyczne 4, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wojtanowska N., Legal Aspects of Smolensk Catastrophe-Selected Issues, Materials of III Smolensk Conference, konferencjasmolenska.pl/materialy3/19wojtanowska.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar