Open Access

The influence of high and low doses of acrylamide on porcine erythropoiesis

Anna Snarska
Anna Snarska
, 
Katarzyna Palus
Katarzyna Palus
, 
Dominika Wysocka
Dominika Wysocka
 and 
Liliana Rytel
Liliana Rytel
   | Oct 15, 2020
Journal of Veterinary Research's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Published Online: Oct 15, 2020
Page range: 609 - 614
Received: Mar 26, 2020
Accepted: Sep 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0065
Keywords
© 2020 A. Snarska et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing a Howell– Jolly body in erythrocyte in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing a Howell– Jolly body in erythrocyte in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 2

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic and normochromatic erythroblasts in the control group on day 0; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic and normochromatic erythroblasts in the control group on day 0; 1,000×

Fig. 3

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 4

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 5

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 6

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×
Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

The average number of cells from the erythroblastic cell line in relation to 1,000 of all porcine bone marrow cells (mean ± SD) on day 28

ParameterControlLDHD
PROERBL21.2b ± 1.8418.6c ± 2.4826ac ± 6.4
BASO ERBL24.4a ± 2.2718.8ac ± 3.7625.8c ± 3.84
POLY ERBL70.2ab ± 6.260.6ac ± 15.1256.6bc ± 7.92
ORTO ERBL190ab ± 11.2165ac ± 7.291.2bc ± 10.96
TOTAL NORMO305.8ab ± 14.96263ac ± 14201.8bc ± 11.84
PROMEGALOBL000
BASO MEGALO000
POLY MEGALO000
TOTAL MEGALO000
NORMO/MEGALO000
PARA ERBL000
TOTAL ERBL305.8ab ± 14.96263ac ± 14201.8bc ± 11.84

The average number of cells from the erythroblastic cell line in relation to 1,000 of all porcine bone marrow cells (mean ± SD) on day 0

ParameterControlLDHD
PROERBL20.6 ± 2.7220.2 ± 2.2421 ± 1.6
BASO ERBL25.8 ± 3.7627.2 ± 2.5624.6 ± 3.68
POLY ERBL75.8 ± 13.7669.2 ± 9.8478.4 ± 9.52
ORTHO ERBL202 ± 15.6196.2 ± 9.36201.2 ± 7.36
TOTAL NORMO324.2 ± 29.84312.8 ± 15.76325.2 ± 16.96
PROMEGALOBL000
BASO MEGALO000
POLY MEGALO000
TOTAL MEGALO000
NORMO/MEGAL000
PARA ERB0.6 ± 0.7200
TOTAL ERBL324.8 ± 29.76312.8 ± 15.76325.2 ± 16.96
eISSN:
2450-8608
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Microbiology and Virology, other, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine
Journal RSS Feed