Haemodynamics imaging of swine segmental kidney artery using duplex Doppler technique

1. Atalabi O.M., Afolabi O.S., Asinobi A.O.: Renal Doppler indices in children with nephrotic syndrome: findings from a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Niger. J Physiol Sci 2015, 30, 17–23.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bude R.O., DiPietro M.A., Platt J.F., Rubin J.M., Miesowicz S., Lundquist C.: Age dependency of the renal resistive index in healthy children. Radiology 1992, 184, 469–473.10.1148/radiology.184.2.16208501620850Search in Google Scholar

3. Carvalho C.F., Chammas M.C.: Normal Doppler velocimetry of renal vasculature in Persian cats. J Feline Med Surg 2011, 13, 399–404.10.1016/j.jfms.2010.12.00821277819Search in Google Scholar

4. Chu Y., Liu H., Xing P., Lou G., Wu C.: The morphology and haemodynamics of the rabbit renal artery: evaluation by conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Lab Anim 2011, 45, 204–208.10.1258/la.2011.01102221669903Search in Google Scholar

5. Commission of the European Communities. Third report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes in the member states of the European Union. Brussels, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

6. Gaviria E.J., Restrepo J.G., Marín J.D., Arango G., Aramburo D., Franco F., Tintinago L.F.: Evaluation of propofol as an anesthetic in swine tracheal transplant surgery. Rev Col Cienc Pec 2007, 20, 447–454.Search in Google Scholar

7. Gudmundsson S., Maršál K.: Doppler ultrasound examination of the renal artery in healthy women, normotensive pregnant women, and in pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991, 1, 258–260.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1991.01040258.x12797054Search in Google Scholar

8. Henes F.O., Regier M., Bannas P., Henker M., Heinemann A., Sperhake J., Begemann P.G., Adam G., Groth M.: Early time-related course of image findings in postmortem MRI: typical findings and observer agreement in a porcine model. Leg Med 2017, 28, 15-21.10.1016/j.legalmed.2017.07.00528738216Search in Google Scholar

9. In-Chul P., Hye-Sun L., Jong-Taek K., So-Jeong N., Ran Ch., Ki-Seok O., Chang-Ho S., Changbaig H.: Ultrasonographic evaluation of renal dimension and resistive index in clinically healthy Korean domestic short-hair cats. J Vet Sci 2008, 9, 415–419.10.4142/jvs.2008.9.4.415281178419043318Search in Google Scholar

10. Kaya M., Pekcan Z., Sen Y., Boztok B., Senel O.O., Bumin A.: Effects of short-acting anaesthetics on haemodynamic function as determined by Doppler US in rabbits. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2011, 17, 713–719.Search in Google Scholar

11. Keogan M., Kliewer M., Hertzberg B., DeLong D.M., Tupler R.H., Carroll B.A.: Renal resistive indexes: variability in Doppler US measurement in a healthy population. Radiology 1996, 199, 165–169.10.1148/radiology.199.1.86331418633141Search in Google Scholar

12. Kim S.H.: The usefulness of pulsatile flow detection in measuring resistive index in renal Doppler US. Korean J Radiol 2002, 3, 45–48.10.3348/kjr.2002.3.1.45271398611919478Search in Google Scholar

13. Kujawa-Szewieczek A., Kolonko A., Chudek J., Więcek A.: No effect of pretransplantation bilateral nephrectomy on the resistive indices measured in the kidney allograft. Transplant Proc 2014, 46, 2602–2605.10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.08.02925380876Search in Google Scholar

14. Lin G.J., Cher T.W.: Renal vascular resistance in normal children - a color Doppler study. Pediatric Nephrol 1997, 11, 182–185.10.1007/s0046700502559090659Search in Google Scholar

15. Lind N.M., Moustgaard A., Jelsing J., Vajta G., Cumming P., Hansen A.K.: The use of pigs in neuroscience – modeling brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007, 31, 728–743.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.003Search in Google Scholar

16. Mitchell S.K., Toal R.L., Daniel G.B., Rohrbach B.W.: Evaluation of renal hemodynamics in awake and isofluoraneanesthetized cats with pulsed-wave Doppler and quantitative renal scintigraphy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998, 39, 451–458.10.1111/j.1740-8261.1998.tb01634.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Möckel M., Scheinert D., Potapov E.V., Wellnhofer E., Combé V., Nasseri B.A., Maier D., Meyer S., Yankah C., Hetzer R., Frei U., Eckardt K.U.: Continuous measurements of renal perfusion in pigs by means of intravascular Doppler. Kidney Int 2001, 59, 1439–1447.10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0590041439.xSearch in Google Scholar

18. Naqvi J., Yap K.H., Ahmad G., Ghosh J.: Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: a review of the physical principles and major applications in critical care. Int J Vasc Med 2013, 6, 1–13.10.1155/2013/629378Search in Google Scholar

19. Ozel D., Ozel B.D., Ozkan F., Kutlu R.: Evalution of renal involvement in patients with Behçet disease: Need to be aware about potential hypertension in long term follow up? Pol J Radiol 2016, 81, 5–9.10.12659/PJR.895446Search in Google Scholar

20. Pope J.C., Hernanz-Schulman M., Showalter P.R., Cole T.C., Schrum F.F., Szurkus D., Brock J.W.: The value of Doppler resistive index and peak systolic velocity in the evaluation of porcine renal obstruction. J Urol 1996, 156, 730–733.10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65799-9Search in Google Scholar

21. Rawashdeh Y.F., Mortensen J., Horlyck A., Olsen K.O., Fisker R.V., Schroll L., Frokiaer J.: Resistive index: an experimental study of normal range in the pig. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000, 34, 10–14.10.1080/00365590075001681410757263Search in Google Scholar

22. Rivers B.J., Walter P.A., Letourneau J.G., Finlay D.E., Ritenour E.R., King V.L., O’Brien T.D., Polzin D.J.: Duplex Doppler estimation of resistive index in arcuate arteries of sedated, normal female dogs: implications for use in the diagnosis of renal failure. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1997, 33, 69–76.10.5326/15473317-33-1-698974030Search in Google Scholar

23. Rivers B.J., Walter P.A., O’Brien T.D.: Duplex Doppler estimation of Pourcelot resistive index in arcuate arteries of sedated normal cats. J Vet Intern Med 1996, 10, 28–33.10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02020.x8965265Search in Google Scholar

24. Rivers B.J., Walter P.A., Polzin D.J., King V.L.: Duplex doppler estimation of intrarenal pourcelot resistive index in dogs and cats with renal disease. J Vet Intern Med 1997, 11, 250–260.10.1111/j.1939-1676.1997.tb00099.x9298481Search in Google Scholar

25. Rodrigues A.C., Santos L.C.D., Otsuki D.A., Saad K.R., Saad P.F., Montero E.F.S., Utiyama E.M.: Animal model of continuous peritoneal lavage with vacuum peritoneostomy. Acta Cir Bras 2017, 32, 467–474.10.1590/s0102-865020170060000007Search in Google Scholar

26. Sauerbrey A., Hindel S., Maaß M., Krüger Ch., Wissmann A., Kramer M., Nafz B., Lüdemann L.: Establishment of a swine model for validation of perfusion measurement by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. BioMed Res Int 2014, 7, 1–9.10.1155/2014/390506Search in Google Scholar

27. Shoemarker W.: Relation of oxygen transport patterns to the pathophysiology and therapy of shock states. Intensive Care Med 1987, 13, 230–243.10.1007/BF00265111Search in Google Scholar

28. Shokeir A.A., Abdulmaaboud M.: Prospective comparison of non-enhanced helical computerized tomography and Doppler US for the diagnosis of renal colic. J Urol 2001, 165, 1082–1084.10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66431-2Search in Google Scholar

29. Stygar A.H., Dolecheck K.A., Kristensen A.R.: Analyses of body weight patterns in growing pigs: a new view on body weight in pigs for frequent monitoring. Animal 2018, 12, 295–302.10.1017/S175173111700169028735585Search in Google Scholar

30. Sullivan T.P., Eaglstein W.H., Davis S.C., Mertz P.: The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regener 2001, 9, 66–76.10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x11350644Search in Google Scholar

31. Swindle M.M., Makin A., Herron A.J., Clubb F.J., Frazier K.S.: Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing. Vet Pathol 2012, 49, 344–356.10.1177/030098581140284621441112Search in Google Scholar

32. Takano R., Ando Y., Taniguchi N., Itoh K., Asano Y.: Power Doppler sonography of the kidney: effect of Valsalva’s maneuver. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001, 29, 384–388.Search in Google Scholar

33. Trafidło T., Gaszyński W., Gaszyński T.: The contemporary conversion of the haemodynamic monitoring paradigms in a shock. Anestezjol Ratownictwo 2010, 4, 99–110.Search in Google Scholar

34. Tublin M.E., Bude R.O., Platt J.F.: The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand? Am J Roentgenol 2003, 180, 885–892.10.2214/ajr.180.4.180088512646425Search in Google Scholar

35. Zhang H., Xing X., Wang Z., He M.: Evaluation of split renal function for children with kidney diseases by renal and vascular color ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018, 44, 2602–2608.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.01830185386Search in Google Scholar