[AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (9th ed.). AAPOR. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed August 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Banks, J., M. Alastair, and J.P. Smith. 2011. “Attrition and Health in Ageing Studies: Evidence from ELSA and HRS.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 2: 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115.10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115387299924376472]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergmann, M., T. Kneip, G. De Luca, and A. Scherpenzeel. 2019. Survey Participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Wave 1–7. SHARE Working Paper Series 31-2017. Munich, Germany: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy. Available at: http://www.share-project.org/uploads/tx_sharepublications/WP_Series_41_2019_Bergmann_et_al.pdf (accessed February 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2017. “Representativeness in Panel Surveys.” Mathematical Population Studies 24: 126 – 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2016.1271650.10.1080/08898480.2016.1271650]Search in Google Scholar
[Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2019. “Social Indicators to Explain Response in Longitudinal Studies.” Social Indicators Research 141: 931–957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1874-7.10.1007/s11205-018-1874-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Binder, D. 1998. “Longitudinal Surveys: Why Are These Surveys Different from All Other Surveys?” Survey Methodology 24: 101–108. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X19980024347 (accessed June 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Börsch-Supan, A., M. Brandt, C. Hunkler, T. Kneip, J. Korbmacher, F. Malter, B. Schaan, S. Stuck, and S. Zuber. 2013. “Data Resource Profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).” International Journal of Epidemiology 42: 992–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088.10.1093/ije/dyt088378099723778574]Search in Google Scholar
[Börsch-Supan, A. 2017. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 1. Release version: 6.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w1.600.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bristle, J., M. Celidoni, C. Dal Bianco, and G. Weber. 2019. “The Contributions of Paradata and Features of Respondents, Interviewers and Survey Agencies to Panel Co-Operation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 182: 3–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12391.10.1111/rssa.12391670606131439985]Search in Google Scholar
[Buck, N., J. Burton, H. Laurie, P. Lynn, and S.C.N. Uhrig. 2006. Quality Profile: British Household Panel. Survey Version 2.0: Waves 1 to 13: 1991–2003. Colchester, UK: University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Luca, G., C. Rossetti, and F. Malter. 2013. “Sample Design and Weighting Strategies in SHARE Wave 5.” In SHARE Wave 5: Innovations & Methodology, edited by F. Malter and A. Börsch-Supan, 75–84. Munich, Germany: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurostat. 2004–2015. Available at: “https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/population-demo-graphy-migration-projections/population-projections-/database (accessed June 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitzgerald, J., P. Gottschalk, and R. Moffitt. 1998. “An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics.” The Journal of Human Resources 33: 251–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/146433.10.2307/146433]Search in Google Scholar
[Leon, D.A. 2011. “Trends in European life expectancy: a salutary view.” International Journal of Epidemiology 40: 271–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr061.10.1093/ije/dyr06121415000]Search in Google Scholar
[Lepkowski, J.M. and M.P. Couper. 2002. “Nonresponse in the Second Wave of Longitudinal Household Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R. J.A. Little, 259–272. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lugtig, P. 2014. “Panel Attrition.” Sociological Methods & Research 43: 699–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113520305.10.1177/0049124113520305]Search in Google Scholar
[Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored fieldwork design to increase representative household survey response: an experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176: 169–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P. 2009. “Methods for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 1–19. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch1]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P. and P. Lugtig. 2017. “Total Survey Error for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Total Survey Error in Practice, edited by P.P. Biemer, E. De Leeuw, S. Eckman, B. Edwards, F. Kreuter, L.E. Lyberg, N.C. Tucker, and B.T. West, 279–298. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119041702.ch13]Search in Google Scholar
[Mood, C. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do what We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It.” European Sociological Review 26: 67–82.10.1093/esr/jcp006]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, J.C., G.B. Durrant, and P.W. F. Smith. 2016. “Data Set Representativeness during Data Collection in Three UK Social Surveys: Generalizability and the Effects of Auxiliary Covariate Choice.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society): 229–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12256.10.1111/rssa.12256]Search in Google Scholar
[Myrskylä, M., J.R. Goldstein, and Y.A. Cheng. 2013. “New Cohort Fertility Forecasts for the Developed World: Rises, Falls, and Reversals.” Population and Development Review 39: 31–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.x.10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Olsen, R.J. 2018. “Respondent Attrition Versus Data Attrition and Their Reduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, edited by D.L. Vannette and J.A. Krosnick, 155–158. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_20]Search in Google Scholar
[RISQ. 2015. Representative Indicators for Survey Quality-Tools. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. Available at: https://www.cmist.manchester.ac.uk/research/-projects/representative-indicators-for-survey-quality/tools/ (accessed August 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, C., C. Vandenplas, and M.E. Stähli. 2014. “Evaluating the Impact of Response Enhancement Methods on the Risk of Nonresponse Bias and Survey Costs.” Survey Research Methods 8: 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i2.5459.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoeni, R.F., F. Stafford, K.A. McGonagle, and P. Andreski. 2013. “Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 60–87.10.1177/0002716212456363355514023358122]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, Ø. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, Ka. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response through R-Indicators and Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review 80: 382–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 1–24. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/indicators-for-monitoring-and-improving-representativeness-of-response.pdf (accessed May 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[SHARE-ERIC. 2018. SHARE Publications: Journal Articles.Available at: http://www.share-project.org/share-publications/journalarticles00.html (accessed August 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, P., P. Lynn, and D. Elliot. 2009. “Sample Design for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by M. Groves, G. Kalton, J.N. Rao, N. Schwarz, C. Skinner, and P. Lynn, 21–33. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch2]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, D. 2003. “Sample Attrition between Waves 1 and 5 in the European Community Household Panel.” European Sociological Review 19: 361–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.4.361.10.1093/esr/19.4.361]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2009. “Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 157–181. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch10]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2019. “Chasing Hard-to-Get Cases in Panel Surveys: Is it Worth it?” methods, data, analyses 13: 199–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2018.03.]Search in Google Scholar