[AAPOR. 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (9th ed.). American Association for Public Opinion Research. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ansolabehere, S. and D. Rivers. 2013. “Cooperative Survey Research.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 307–329. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022811-160625.10.1146/annurev-polisci-022811-160625]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ansolabehere, S. and B.F. Schaffner. 2014. “Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison.” Political Analysis 22(3): 285–303. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025.10.1093/pan/mpt025]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baker, R., J.M. Brick, N.A. Bates, M. Battaglia, M.P. Couper, J.A. Dever, K.J. Gile, and R. Tourangeau. 2013. Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-Probability Sampling. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/NPS_TF_Report_Final_7_revised_FNL_6_22_13.pdf (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom, A.G., D. Ackermann-Piek, S.C. Helmschrott, C. Cornesse, and J.W. Sakshaug. 2017. “The Representativeness of Online Panels: Coverage, Sampling and Weighting.” Paper Presented at the General Online Research Conference.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom, A.G., C. Gathmann, and U. Krieger. 2015. “Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population: The German Internet Panel.” Field Methods 27(4): 391–408. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494.10.1177/1525822X15574494]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blom, A.G., J.M.E. Herzing, C. Cornesse, J.W. Sakshaug, U. Krieger, and D. Bossert. 2016a. “Does the Recruitment of Offline Households Increase the Sample Representativeness of Probability-Based Online Panels? Evidence from the German Internet Panel.” Social Science Computer Review 35(4): 498 – 520. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316651584.10.1177/0894439316651584]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blom, A.G., M. Bosnjak, A. Cornilleau, A.-S. Cousteaux, M. Das, S. Douhou and U. Krieger. 2016b. “A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe.” Social Science Computer Review 35(1): 8 – 25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315574825.10.1177/0894439315574825]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bosnjak, M., T. Dannwolf, T. Enderle, I. Schaurer, B. Struminskaya, A. Tanner, and K.W. Weyandt. 2017. “Establishing an Open Probability-Based Mixed-Mode Panel of the General Population in Germany: The GESIS Panel.” Social Science Computer Review 36(1): 103–115. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317697949.10.1177/0894439317697949]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Briggs, D., D. Fecht, and K. De Hoogh. 2007. “Census Data Issues for Epidemiology and Health Risk Assessment: Experiences from the Small Area Health Statistics Unit.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 170(2): 355–378. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00467.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00467.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cacioppo, J.T. and R.E. Petty. 1982. “The Need for Cognition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(1): 116. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116.10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Callegaro, M., A. Villar, J. Krosnick, and D. Yeager. 2014. “A Critical Review of Studies Investigating the Quality of Data Obtained with Online Panels.” In Online Panel Research. A Data Quality Perspective, edited by M. Callegaro, R.P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, A.S. Goeritz, J.A. Krosnick, and P.J. Lavrakas, 23–53. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118763520.ch2.10.1002/9781118763520.ch2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chang, L. and J.A. Krosnick. 2009. “National Surveys via RDD Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73(4): 641–678. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075.10.1093/poq/nfp075]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Digman, J.M. 1990. “Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-factor Model.” Annual Review of Psychology 41(1): 417–440. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221.10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DiSogra, C., C. Cobb, E. Chan, and J. Dennis. 2012. “Using Probability-Based Online Samples to Calibrate Non-Probability Opt-in Samples.” Presentation at: 67th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). Available at: http://www.websm.org/uploadi/editor/1361444163DiSogra_et_al_2012_Using_Probability_Based_Online_Samples.ppt (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dutwin, D. and T.D. Buskirk. 2017. “Apples to Oranges or Gala Versus Golden Delicious? Comparing Data Quality of Nonprobability Internet Samples to Low Response Rate Probability Samples.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81(S1): 213–239. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw061.10.1093/poq/nfw061]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Efron, B. 1979. “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife.” The Annals of Statistics, 1–26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_41.10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_41]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Elliott, M.N. and A. Haviland. 2007. “Use of a Web-based Convenience Sample to Supplement a Probability Sample.” Survey Methodology 33(2): 211–215. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2007002/article/10498-eng.pdf?st=A8NHMZ2v (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Elliott, M.R. 2013. “Combining Data from Probability and Non-probability Samples Using Pseudo-weights.” Survey Practice 2(6). Doi: https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2009-0025.10.29115/SP-2009-0025]Search in Google Scholar
[Erens, B., S. Burkill, M.P. Couper, F. Conrad, S. Clifton, C. Tanton, A. Phelps, J. Datta, C.H. Mercer, P. Sonnenberg, et al. 2014. “Nonprobability Web Surveys to Measure Sexual Behaviors and Attitudes in the General Population: A Comparison with a Probability Sample Interview Survey.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 16(12). Doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3382.10.2196/jmir.3382427549725488851]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fahimi, M., F.M. Barlas, W. Gross, and R.K. Thomas. 2014. “Towards a New Math for Nonprobability Sampling Alternatives.” Presented at the 69th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelman, A., J.B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, and D.B. Rubin. 2013. Bayesian Data Analysis, Third Edition. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC. ISBN: 9781439840955.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelman, A., S. Goel, D. Rothschild, and W. Wang. 2016. “High-frequency Polling with Non-representative Data.” In Political Communication in Real Time: Theoretical and Applied Research Approaches (eds. D. Schill, R. Kirk, and A.E. Jasperson). Routledge, 117–133.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, L.R. 1993. “The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits.” American Psychologist 48(1): 26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26.10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Herzing, J.M.E. and A.G. Blom. 2019. “The Influence of a Person’s IT Literacy on Unit Nonresponse and Attrition in an Online Panel.” Social Science Computer Review 37(3): 404–424. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318774758.10.1177/0894439318774758]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, C., A. Mercer, S. Keeter, N. Hatley, K. McGeeney, and A. Gimenez. 2016. Evaluating Online Nonprobability Surveys. Vendor Choice Matters; Widespread Errors Found for Estimates Based on Blacks and Hispanics, Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/2016/05/02/evaluatingonline-nonprobability-surveys/ (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, S. 2006. “Propensity Score Adjustment as a Weighting Scheme for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 22(2): 329. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/f6bcee6f397c4fd68db6452fc9643e68/propensity-score-adjustment-as-a-weighting-scheme-for-volunteer-panel-web-surveys.pdf (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, S. and R. Valliant. 2009. “Estimation for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys using Propensity Score Adjustment and Calibration Adjustment.” Sociological Methods & Research 37(3): 319–343. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108329643.10.1177/0049124108329643]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MacInnis, G., J.A. Krosnick, S. Ho, and M.J. Cho. 2018. “The Accuracy of Measurements with Probability and Nonprobability Survey Samples: Replication and Extension.” Public Opinion Quarterly. Volume 82, Issue 4, 707–744. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy038.10.1093/poq/nfy038]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Malhotra, N. and J.A. Krosnick. 2007. “The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences About Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples.” Political Analysis, 286–323. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm003.10.1093/pan/mpm003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Marchetti, S., C. Giusti, and M. Pratesi. 2016. “The Use of Twitter Data to Improve Small Area Estimates of Households’ Share of Food Consumption Expenditure in Italy.” AStA Wirtschafts-und Sozialstatistisches Archiv 10(2–3): 79–93. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-016-0190-4.10.1007/s11943-016-0190-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mercer, A.W., F. Kreuter, S. Keeter, and E.A. Stuart. 2017. “Theory and Practice in Nonprobability Surveys: Parallels between Causal Inference and Survey Inference.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81(S1): 250–271. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw060.10.1093/poq/nfw060]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pasek, J. 2016. “When Will Nonprobability Surveys Mirror Probability Surveys? Considering Types of Inference and Weighting Strategies as Criteria for Correspondence.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28(2): 269–291. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv016.10.1093/ijpor/edv016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pennay, D.W., D. Neiger, P.J. Lavrakas, K.A. Borg, S. Mission, and N. Honey. 2018. “The Online Panels Benchmarking Study: a Total Survey Error Comparison of Findings from Probability-Based Surveys and Nonprobability Online Panel Surveys in Australia.” Australian National University, Centre for Social Research and Methods Paper NO. 2/2018. Available at: http://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/2018/12/CSRM_MP2_2018_ONLINE_PANELS.pdf (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, A.T., S.H. Holan, C.K. Wikle, and N. Cressie. 2014. “Spatial Fay-Herriot Models for Small Area Estimation with Functional Covariates.” Spatial Statistics 10: 27–42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2014.07.001.10.1016/j.spasta.2014.07.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[R Core Team. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Rao, J.N. 2003. Small-Area Estimation. Wiley Online Library. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722189.10.1002/0471722189]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rivers, D. 2007. “Sampling for Web Surveys.” Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fffa/a7e52c5d163a0944974a68160ee6e0a6b481.pdf (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Rivers, D. and D. Bailey. 2009. “Inference from Matched Samples in the 2008 US National Elections.” In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Volume 1, 627–639. Palo Alto, CA: YouGov/Polimetrix. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e566/fb48f88ae34640b729387cbd4006249f8c45.pdf (accessed July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmertmann, C.P., S.M. Cavenaghi, R.M. Assunção, and J.E. Potter. 2013. “Bayes Plus Brass: Estimating Total Fertility for Many Small Areas from Sparse Census Data.” Population Studies 67(3): 255 – 273. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2013.795602.10.1080/00324728.2013.795602380620924143946]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Spiegelhalter, D., A. Thomas, N. Best, and D. Lunn. 2007. OpenBUGS user manual, version 3.0.2. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sturtz, S., U. Ligges, A. Gelman, et al. 2005. “R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R.” Journal of Statistical Software 12(3): 1 – 16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v012.i03.10.18637/jss.v012.i03]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R. and T. Plewes. 2013. Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. National Academies Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/18293.10.17226/18293]Search in Google Scholar
[Valliant, R. and J.A. Dever. 2011. “Estimating Propensity Adjustments for Volunteer Web Surveys.” Sociological Methods & Research 40(1): 105 – 137. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124110392533.10.1177/0049124110392533]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wang, W., D. Rothschild, S. Goel, and A. Gelman. 2015. “Forecasting Elections with Non-representative Polls.” International Journal of Forecasting 31(3): 980–991. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Yeager, D.S., J.A. Krosnick, L. Chang, H.S. Javitz, M.S. Levendusky, A. Simpser, and R. Wang. 2011. “Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-probability Samples.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1): 709–747. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr020.10.1093/poq/nfr020]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar