Cross-National Comparison of Equivalence and Measurement Quality of Response Scales in Denmark and Taiwan

Allison, P.D. 1987. “Estimation of Linear Models with Incomplete Data.” In Sociological Methodology, edited by C.C. Clogg, 71–103. Washington DC: American Sociological Association. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/271029.10.2307/271029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Alwin, D.F. 1974. “Approaches to the Interpretation of Relationships in the Multitrait Multimethod Matrix.” Sociological Methodology 5: 79–105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/270833.10.2307/270833Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Alwin, D.F. 1997. “Feeling Thermometers versus 7-point Scales: Which Are Better?” Sociological Methods and Research 25: 318–340. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124197025003003.10.1177/0049124197025003003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Alwin, D.F. and J.A. Krosnick. 1991. “The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement: The Influence of Question and Respondent Attributes.” Sociological Methods and Research 20: 139–181. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124191020001005.10.1177/0049124191020001005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bjørnskov, C. 2010. “How Comparable Are The Gallup World Poll Life Satisfaction Data?” Journal of Happiness Studies 11: 41–60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9121-6.10.1007/s10902-008-9121-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Butts, M.M., R.J. Vandenberg, and L.J. Williams. 2006. “Investigating the Susceptibility of Measurement Invariance Tests: The Effects of Common Method Variance.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2006(1): D1–D6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPp.2006.27182126.10.5465/AMBPp.2006.27182126Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Byrne, B.M. and D. Watkins. 2003. “The Issue of Measurement Invariance Revisited.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34(2): 155–175. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102250225.10.1177/0022022102250225Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Campbell, D.T. and D.W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.” Psychological Bulletin 56(2): 81–105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016.10.1037/h0046016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chen, C.K. 2005. “Construct Model of Knowledge: Based Economy Indicators.” Management Review 24(3): 17–41. Doi: https://doi.org/10.6656/MR.2005.24.3.CHI.17.10.6656/MR.2005.24.3.CHI.17Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chen, C., S.Y. Lee, and H.W. Stevenson. 1995. “Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales among East Asian and North American Students.” Psychological Science 6: 170–175. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

ESS Round 1: European Social Survey. 2014. ESS-1 2002 Documentation Report. Edition 6.4. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC. Available at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round1/survey/ESS1_data_documentation_report_e06_4.pdf (accessed May 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Fu, Y.-C., Y.-H. Chang, S.-H. Tu, and P.-S. Liao. 2016. 2015 Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 7, Year 1): Globalization, Work, Family, Mental Health, and Political Participation (C00315_2) [Data file]. Available at Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica. Doi: https://doi.org/10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00315_1-1.10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00315_1-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Goerman, P.L. and R.A. Caspar. 2010. “Managing the Cognitive Pretesting of Multilingual Survey Instruments: A Case Study of Pretesting of the U.S. Census Bureau Bilingual Spanish/English Questionnaire.” In Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts, edited by J. Harkness, et al.: 75–90. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470609927.ch5.10.1002/9780470609927.ch5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Harzing, A.W. 2006. “Response Styles in Cross-National Survey Research: A 26 Country Study.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 6 (2)(August 1): 243–266. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595806066332.10.1177/1470595806066332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hsiao, C.-C. and C.-H. Tu. 2012. “Common Method Variance in the Measurement of Teachers’ Creative Teaching.” Psychological Testing 59(4): 609–639. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7108%2fPT.201212.0609.Search in Google Scholar

Holbrook, A., Y.K. Cho, and T. Johnson. 2006. “The Impact of Question and Respondent Characteristics on Comprehension and Mapping Difficulties.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 565–595. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl027.10.1093/poq/nfl027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Horn, J.L. and J.J. McArdle. 1992. “A Practical and Theoretical Guide to Measurement Invariance in Aging Research.” Experimental Aging Research 18(3–4): 117–144. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739208253916.10.1080/036107392082539161459160Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lau, C.Q. 2016. “Rating Scale Design among Ethiopian Entrepreneurs: A Split-Ballot Experiment.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research edw031. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw031.10.1093/ijpor/edw031Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Liao, P.-S. 2014. “More Happy or Less Unhappy? Comparison of the Balanced and Unbalanced Designs for the Response Scale of General Happiness.” Journal of Happiness Studies 15(6): 1407–1423. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9484-1.10.1007/s10902-013-9484-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Marsh, H.W. and B.M. Byrne. 1993. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Self-concept Data: Between-group and Within-group Invariance Constraints.” Multivariate Behavior Research 28(3): 313–449. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_2.10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_226776891Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Meurs, A. and W.E. Saris. 1990. “Memory Effects in MTMM Studies.” In Evaluations of Measurement Instruments by Metaanalysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Studies, edited by W.E. Saris and A. van Meurs, 134–146. Amsterdam: North Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Oberski, D.L., W.E. Saris, and J. Hagenaars. 2007. “Why Are There Differences in Measurement Quality across Countries?” In Measuring Meaningful Data in Social Research, edited by G. Loosveldt and Swyngedouw. Leuven: Acco. Available at: http://daob.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Oberski-Saris-Why-are-there-differencesin-measurement-quality-across-countries.pdf (accessed January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Oberski, D., W.E. Saris, and J.A. Hagenaars. 2010. “Categorization Errors and Differences in the Quality of Questions in Comparative Surveys.” In Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts, edited by J. Harkness, et al.: 435–453. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470609927.ch23.10.1002/9780470609927.ch23Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pan, Y., B. Craig, and S. Scollon. 2005. “Results from Chinese Cognitive Interviews on the Census 2000 Long Form: Language, Literacy, and Cultural Issues.” Statistical Research Division’s Research Report Series (Survey Methodology 2005 – 09). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Available at https://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/rsm2005-09.pdf (accessed November 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, T. 2008. “Spilt Ballot as An Experimental Approach to Public Opinion Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Public Opinion Research, edited by W. Donsbach and M.W. Traugott, 322–329. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Available at: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/sage-hdbk-public-opinion-research/n30.xml (accessed January 2019).10.4135/9781848607910.n30Search in Google Scholar

Revilla, M. 2015. “Comparison of the Quality Estimates in a Mixed-Mode and a Unimode Design: An Experiment from the European Social Survey.” Quality and Quantity 49(3): 1219–1238. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0044-5.10.1007/s11135-014-0044-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Revilla, M. and W.E. Saris. 2013. “The Split-Ballot Multitrait-Multimethod Approach: Implementation and Problems.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 20: 27–46. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.742379.10.1080/10705511.2013.742379Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Revilla, M., W.E. Saris, G. Loewe, and C. Ochoa. 2015. “Can a Non-Probabilistic Online Panel Get Similar Question Quality as the ESS?” International Journal of Market Research 57(3): 395–412. Available at: https://www.mrs.org.uk/ijmr_article/article/104501 (accessed January 2019).10.2501/IJMR-2015-034Search in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E. and F.M. Andrews. 1991. “Evaluation of Measurement Instruments Using a Structural Modeling Approach.” In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by P.P. Biemer, et al.: 575–597. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9781118150382.ch28Search in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E. and I.N. Gallhofer. 2007. “Estimation of the Effects of Measurement Characteristics on the Quality of Survey Questions.” Survey Research Methods 1: 29–43. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2007.v1i1.49.Search in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E. and I.N. Gallhofer. 2014. Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research (Second edition). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118634646Search in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E., A. Satorra, and G. Coenders. 2004. “A New Approach to Evaluating the Quality of Measurement Instruments: The Split-Ballot MTMM Design.” Sociological Methodology 34: 311–347. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00155.x.10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00155.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E., A. Satorra, and W.M. van der Veld. 2009. “Testing Structural Equation Models or Detection of Misspecifications?” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 16(4): 561–582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433.10.1080/10705510903203433Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E., R. Veenhoven, A.C. Scherpenzeel, and B. Brunting. 2008. A Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Life in Europe. Budapest: Eötvös University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E., M. Revilla, J.A. Krosnick, and E.M. Shaffer. 2010. “Comparing Questions with Agree/Disagree Response Options to Questions with Item-Specific Response Options.” Survey Research Methods 4: 61–79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.2682.Search in Google Scholar

Saris, W., D. Oberski, M. Revilla, D. Zavala, L. Lilleoja, I. Gallhofer, and T. Gruner. 2011. “The Development of the Program SQP 2.0 for the Prediction of the Quality of Survey Questions.” RECSM Working Paper 24, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Available at: https://www.upf.edu/documents/3966940/3986764/RECSM_wp024.pdf (accessed January 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Satorra, A. 1993. “Asymptotic Robust Inferences in Multi-sample Analysis of Augmented Moment Matrices.” In Multivariate Analysis; Future Directions, edited by R. Rao and C.M. Cuadras, 211–229. Amsterdam, North Holland.10.1016/B978-0-444-81531-6.50018-0Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N.C. and S. Presser. 2003. “The Science of Asking Questions.” Annual Review of Sociology 29: 65–88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.110702.110112.10.1146/annurev.soc.29.110702.110112Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schuman, H. and S. Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van der Veld, W., W.E. Saris, and A. Satorra. 2008. Jrule 2.0: User Manual, Unpublished document.Search in Google Scholar

Weng, L-J. 2004. “Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test-Retest Reliability.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 64: 956–972. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404268674.10.1177/0013164404268674Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wu, C-E. and Y-T. Lin. 2013. “Cross-Strait Economic Openness, Identity, and Vote Choice: An Analysis of the 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections.” Journal of Electoral Studies 20(2): 1–36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2013.20.02.01-35.10.6612/tjes.2013.20.02.01-35Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zavala-Rojas, D., R. Tormos, W. Weber, and M. Revilla. 2018. “Designing Response Scales with Multi-Trait-Multi-Method Experiments.” Mathematical Population Studies 25(2): 66–81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2018.1439241.10.1080/08898480.2018.1439241Open DOISearch in Google Scholar