[Berger, Y. 2004. “Variance Estimation for Measures of Change in Probability Sampling.” The Canadian Journal of Statistics 32: 451-467. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3316027.10.2307/3316027]Search in Google Scholar
[Dalenius, T. and J.L. Hodges. 1959. “Minimum Variance Stratification.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 54: 88-101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2282141.10.1080/01621459.1959.10501501]Search in Google Scholar
[Fishman, G.S. and L.R. Moore. 1982. “A Statistical Evaluation of Multiplicative Congruential Random Number Generators with Modulus 231-1.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 29-136. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1982.10477775.10.1080/01621459.1982.10477775]Search in Google Scholar
[Garås, T. 1989. Estimators of Change in Dynamic Populations. Memo: Statistics Sweden. (In Swedish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hidiroglou, M., C.-E. Särndal, and D. Binder. 1995. “Weighting and Estimation in Business Surveys.” In Business Survey Methods, edited by B.G. Cox, D.A. Binder, B.N. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M. Colledge, and P.S. Scott, 477-502. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laniel, N. 1988. “Variances for a Rotating Sample from a Changing Population.” In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section: American Statistical Association. 246-250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindblom, A. 2003. SAMU - The System for Coordination of Frame Populations and Samples from the Business Register at Statistics Sweden. Background Facts on Economic Statistics 2003:3, Statistics Sweden. Available at: http://www.scb.se/statistik/OV/AA9999/2003M00/X100ST0303.pdf (accessed September 1, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Neyman, J. 1934. “On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society 97: 558-606. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2342192.10.2307/2342192]Search in Google Scholar
[Nordberg, L. 2000. “On Variance Estimation for Measures of Change When Samples are Coordinated by the Use of Permanent Random Numbers.” Journal of Official Statistics 16: 363-378. Available at: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article¼164363 (accessed September 1, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlsson, E. 1992. SAMU - The System for Co-ordination of Samples from the Business Register at Statistics Sweden. R&D Report, Statistics Sweden, 1992:18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlsson, E. 1995. “Coordination of Samples using Permanent Random Numbers.” In Business Survey Methods, edited by B. Cox, D. Binder, B. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M. Colledge, and P. Kott, 153-169. New York: John Wiley.10.1002/9781118150504.ch9]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E., B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Tam, S.M. 1984. “On Covariances from Overlapping Samples.” The American Statistician 38: 288-292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1984.10483227.10.1080/00031305.1984.10483227]Search in Google Scholar
[Wood, J. 2008. “On the Covariance Between Related Horvitz-Thompson Estimators.” Journal of Official Statistics 24: 53-78. Available at: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article¼241053 (accessed September 1, 2014). ]Search in Google Scholar