Open Access

On Precision in Estimates of Change over Time where Samples are Positively Coordinated by Permanent Random Numbers


Cite

Berger, Y. 2004. “Variance Estimation for Measures of Change in Probability Sampling.” The Canadian Journal of Statistics 32: 451-467. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3316027.10.2307/3316027Search in Google Scholar

Dalenius, T. and J.L. Hodges. 1959. “Minimum Variance Stratification.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 54: 88-101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2282141.10.1080/01621459.1959.10501501Search in Google Scholar

Fishman, G.S. and L.R. Moore. 1982. “A Statistical Evaluation of Multiplicative Congruential Random Number Generators with Modulus 231-1.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 29-136. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1982.10477775.10.1080/01621459.1982.10477775Search in Google Scholar

Garås, T. 1989. Estimators of Change in Dynamic Populations. Memo: Statistics Sweden. (In Swedish).Search in Google Scholar

Hidiroglou, M., C.-E. Särndal, and D. Binder. 1995. “Weighting and Estimation in Business Surveys.” In Business Survey Methods, edited by B.G. Cox, D.A. Binder, B.N. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M. Colledge, and P.S. Scott, 477-502. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Laniel, N. 1988. “Variances for a Rotating Sample from a Changing Population.” In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section: American Statistical Association. 246-250.Search in Google Scholar

Lindblom, A. 2003. SAMU - The System for Coordination of Frame Populations and Samples from the Business Register at Statistics Sweden. Background Facts on Economic Statistics 2003:3, Statistics Sweden. Available at: http://www.scb.se/statistik/OV/AA9999/2003M00/X100ST0303.pdf (accessed September 1, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Neyman, J. 1934. “On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society 97: 558-606. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2342192.10.2307/2342192Search in Google Scholar

Nordberg, L. 2000. “On Variance Estimation for Measures of Change When Samples are Coordinated by the Use of Permanent Random Numbers.” Journal of Official Statistics 16: 363-378. Available at: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article¼164363 (accessed September 1, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Ohlsson, E. 1992. SAMU - The System for Co-ordination of Samples from the Business Register at Statistics Sweden. R&D Report, Statistics Sweden, 1992:18.Search in Google Scholar

Ohlsson, E. 1995. “Coordination of Samples using Permanent Random Numbers.” In Business Survey Methods, edited by B. Cox, D. Binder, B. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M. Colledge, and P. Kott, 153-169. New York: John Wiley.10.1002/9781118150504.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.-E., B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6Search in Google Scholar

Tam, S.M. 1984. “On Covariances from Overlapping Samples.” The American Statistician 38: 288-292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1984.10483227.10.1080/00031305.1984.10483227Search in Google Scholar

Wood, J. 2008. “On the Covariance Between Related Horvitz-Thompson Estimators.” Journal of Official Statistics 24: 53-78. Available at: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article¼241053 (accessed September 1, 2014). Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics