[Kruskal, W. and F. Mosteller. 1979a. “Representative Sampling I: Non-Scientific Literature.” International Statistical Review 47: 13-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1403202.10.2307/1403202]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruskal, W. and F. Mosteller. 1979b. “Representative Sampling II: Scientific Literature Excluding Statistics.” International Statistical Review 47: 111-123. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1402564.10.2307/1402564]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruskal, W. and F. Mosteller. 1979c. “Representative Sampling III: Current Statistical Literature.” International Statistical Review 47: 245-265. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1402647.10.2307/1402647]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ouwehand, P. and B. Schouten. 2011. Representativity of VAT and Survey Data for Short Term Business Statistics. CBS discussion paper 201106. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/methoden/onderzoek-methoden/discussionpapers/archief (accessed date).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Survey Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 231-253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beulens, Ø. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, K. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response Through R-indicators and Partial R-indicators.” International Statistical Review 80: 382-399. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39: 29-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shlomo, N., C. Skinner, and B. Schouten. 2012. “Estimation of an Indicator of the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142: 201-211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.07.008.10.1016/j.jspi.2011.07.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Slootbeek, M. and K. van Bemmel. 2010. Onderzoek Naar Overstappers/Blijvers, Internal report, Statistics Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, K.J. and B.E. Oliver. 2012. “Response Rates in Business Surveys: Going Beyond the Usual Performance Measure.” Journal of Official Statistics 28: 221-237.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Delden, A. and F. W. L. Aelen. 2008. Redesigning the Chain of Economic Statistics at Statistics Netherlands: STS Statistics as an Example. IAOS Conference ‘Reshaping Official Statistics’, 14-16 October 2008, Shanghai. Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/specialtopics/IAOSconference/200811/w020130912531695358471.doc (accessed September 30, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlag, P. and D. van den Bergen. 2010. The Use of VAT for Short Term Statistics: Some Quality Aspects, Statistics Netherlands. In Proceedings ESSnet seminar on administrative data - Rome, 18-19 March 2010. Available at: http://essnet.admindata.eu/Document/Getfile?objectid=5147 (accessed September 30, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Ph.D. thesis. ]Search in Google Scholar