Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations

Aken, J. E. V. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of management studies, 41(2), 219–246.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.xSearch in Google Scholar

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of management review, 36(2), 247–271.10.5465/AMR.2011.59330882Search in Google Scholar

Baran, G. (2018). Design-led Approach to Social Innovation. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 19(9), part 3, 467–482.Search in Google Scholar

Bergman, N., Markusson, N., Connor, P., Middlemiss, & L., Ricci, M. (2010). Bottom-up, social innovation for addressing climate change. In Energy transitions in an interdependent world: what and where are the future social science research agendas. Sussex, 25–26 February 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Ihlström Eriksson, C., Ståhlbröst, A., & Svensson, J. (2009).A Milieu for Innovation: Defining Living Labs. In 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium. New York City, USA, 6–9 December 2009 (p. 12): ISPIM.Search in Google Scholar

Braha, D., & Maimon, O. (1997). The design process: properties, paradigms, and structure. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 27(2), 146–166.10.1109/3468.554679Search in Google Scholar

Bucolo, S., & Matthews, J. H. (2010). Using a design led disruptive innovation approach to develop new services: Practising innovation in times of discontinuity. In Proceedings of the 11th International CINet Conference: Practicing Innovation in the Times of Discontinuity (pp. 176–187). CINet.Search in Google Scholar

Bucolo, S., Wrigley, C., & Matthews, J. (2012). Gaps in organizational leadership: Linking strategic and operational activities through designled propositions. Design Management Journal, 7(1), 18–28.10.1111/j.1948-7177.2012.00030.xSearch in Google Scholar

Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51.10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008Search in Google Scholar

Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R., & Norman, W. (2012).Defining social innovation. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe”(TEPSIE). European Commission–7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of business research, 55(7), 553–560.10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2014). “Systematic combining” – A decade later. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1277–1284.10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.036Search in Google Scholar

Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V. P., & Kulkki, S. (2005).State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach. Center for Distance-spanning Technology. Lulea, Sweden: Lulea University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Følstad, A. (2008). Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Network, 10 (Special on Living Labs), 100–131.Search in Google Scholar

Hillgren, P. A. (2013). Participatory design for social and public innovation: Living Labs as spaces for agonistic experiments and friendly hacking. In E. Manzini, & E. Staszowski (Eds.), Public and Collaborative – Exploring the Intersection of Design, Social Innovation and Public Policy (pp. 75–88). DESIS Network.Search in Google Scholar

Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010).Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Aachen: Aachen University, www.internationalmonitoring.com.Search in Google Scholar

Keyson, D. V., Guerra-Santin, O., & Lockton, D. (2017).Living Labs. Design and Assessment of Sustainable Living. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8Search in Google Scholar

Klimowicz, M. (2015). Żywe Laboratoria jako innowacyjne narzędzie zarządzania miastami. In A. Wiktorska-Święcka (ed.), (Re)organizacja w zarządzaniu miastami w Polsce w kontekście wyzwań rozwojowych (pp. 186–197). Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT.Search in Google Scholar

Kwaśnicki, W. (2015). Innowacje społeczne – nowy paradygmat czy kolejny etap w rozwoju kreatywności człowieka? In W. Misztal, G. Chimiak, & A. Kościański (eds.), Obywatelskość wobec kryzysu: uśpieni czy innowatorzy? (pp. 1–23). Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN. Access: http://kwasnicki.prawo.uni.wroc.pl/todownload/InnowacjeSpoleczneWK.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living Labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(2), 6–11.10.22215/timreview/602Search in Google Scholar

Leminen, S. (2015). Q&A. What Are Living Labs?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9), 29–35.10.22215/timreview/928Search in Google Scholar

Manzini, E. (2014). Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Design Issues, 30(1), 57–66.10.1162/DESI_a_00248Search in Google Scholar

Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: technology, governance, globalization, 1(2), 145–162.10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145Search in Google Scholar

Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007).Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship. Said Business School University of Oxford. The Young Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity research journal, 14(2), 253–266.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_11Search in Google Scholar

Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010).The open book of social innovation (p. 2). London: National endowment for science, technology and the art.Search in Google Scholar

NCBiR (2012).Program Innowacje Społeczne. Warszawa, available at: https://www.ncbr.gov.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/import/tt_content/files/opis_programu_is_1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? – Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48–69.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.xSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2011).Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges. Workshop Proceedings, Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

Olejniczuk-Merta, A. (2013). Innowacje społeczne. Konsumpcja i rozwój, 1(4), 21–34.Search in Google Scholar

Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?. The Journal of Socio-economics, 38(6), 878–885.10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011Search in Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. (1960).Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1969/1996).The Science of the Artificial. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Steward, F., Liff, S., & Dunkelman, M. (2009).Mapping the Big Green Challenge. NESTA Research Report, London: NESTA.Search in Google Scholar

Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: Towards a conceptual framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 6–15.10.22215/timreview/748Search in Google Scholar