Innovator’s Dilemma: Review of the Main Responses to Disruptive Innovation

Adler, P., Heckscher, C., & Grandy, J. (2013). From Clans to Collaboration: Collab-orative Community as the Basis of Organizational Ambidexterity. Universia Business Review, ISSN: 1698-5117.Search in Google Scholar

Berglund, H., & Sandström, C. (2017). A new perspective on the innovator’s dilemma-exploring the role of entrepreneurial incentives. International Journal of Technology Management, 75(1–4), 142–156.10.1504/IJTM.2017.085692Search in Google Scholar

Brodzicki, T. (2017). Internationalisation and Innovation Intensities of Polish Manufacturing Firms: A Close Nexus?. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(1), 91–109.10.15678/EBER.2017.050106Search in Google Scholar

Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have Open Business Model. Winter 2007, 48, 21–28.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, C. M., Alton, R., Rising, C., & Waldeck, A. (2011). The New M&A Play-book. Harvard Business Review, 89, 48–57.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, C.M. (1997).The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, ISBN: 0-87584-585-1.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, C.M., & Raynor M. (2003).The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, ISBN: 1-57851-852-0.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.10.2307/258557Search in Google Scholar

Fayard, A., Gkeredakis, E., & Levina, L. (2016). Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Information Systems Research, 27, 302–323.10.1287/isre.2016.0623Search in Google Scholar

Gans, J. (2016). The other disruption: when innovations threaten the organizational model. Harvard Business Review, March 2016, 78–84.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.10.2307/20159573Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert, C. (2003). The disruption opportunity. Sloan Management Review, 44, 27–32.Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, R., & Clark, K. (1990). Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, no. 1, 9–30.10.2307/2393549Search in Google Scholar

Jansen, J., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 5–18.10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Kauppila, O. P. (2010). Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing separate Interorganizational partnerships. Strategic Organization, 8, 283–312.10.1177/1476127010387409Search in Google Scholar

Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 797–818.10.5465/amj.2006.22083085Search in Google Scholar

March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71Search in Google Scholar

Marx, M., Hsu, D. H., & Gans J. S. (2014). Dynamic commercialization strategies for disruptive technologies: evidence from the speech recognition industry. Management Science, 60(12), 2014, pp. 3103-3123.10.1287/mnsc.2014.2035Search in Google Scholar

Michl, T., Gold, B., & Picot, A. (2012). The spin-along approach: ambidextrous corporate venturing management. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 15(1), 39–56.10.1504/IJESB.2012.044588Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, G. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2016).Lead and disrupt: How to solve the innovator’s dilemma. Stanford: California. ISBN: 9781522689928.Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, G. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011).Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53, 1–18.10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, G. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008).Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Posen, H. (2016). Ridesharing in the Sharing Economy: Should Regulators Impose Über Regulations on Uber?. Iowa Law Review, 101(1), 405–433.Search in Google Scholar

Radovanović, N., Dmitrović, V., & Joksimović, Z. N. (2017). From Knowledge to Innovation and Back: Empirical Testing of Knowledge-Intensive Industries in Serbia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3), 119–131.10.15678/EBER.2017.050306Search in Google Scholar

Rohrbeck, R., Döhler, M., & Arnold, H. (2009). Creating growth with externalization of R&D results – the spin-along approach. Global Business & Organizational Excellence, 28(4), 44–51.10.1002/joe.20267Search in Google Scholar

Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201–222.10.1002/smj.376Search in Google Scholar

Sandström, C., Magnusson, M., & Jörnmark, J. (2009). Exploring Factors Influencing Incumbents’ Response to Disruptive Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(1), 8–15.10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00507.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8–30.10.2307/41165852Search in Google Scholar

Tushman, M.L., & O’Reilly, C.A. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.10.5465/amp.2013.0025Search in Google Scholar