Cite

1. Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X. and Briggs, J.M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756-760. DOI: 10.1126/science.1150195.10.1126/.1150195Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects - The 2014 Revision Highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, US.Search in Google Scholar

3. European Commission. (2014). Living well, within the limits of our planet. The New General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020.Search in Google Scholar

4. European Commission. (2007). Green paper - Towards a new culture for urban mobility. COM(2007) 0551 final. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

5. European Commission. (2009). Action plan of urban mobility. European Communities, COM(2009) 490 final. Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

6. European Center for Government Transformation. (2015). Boosting innovation in cities to deliver better public services – A view from tomorrow’s leaders. College of Europe student case studies, Final report.Search in Google Scholar

7. Figliozzi M.A. (2010). The impacts of congestion on commercial vehicle tour characteristics and costs. Transport. Res E-Log. 46(4), 496–506.10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.005Search in Google Scholar

8. Russo, F. and Comi, A. (2012). City characteristics and urban goods movements: A way to environmental transportation system in a sustainable city. Procd. Soc. Behv. 39, 61–73. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.091.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.091Search in Google Scholar

9. European Commission. (2011). White paper - Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. European Commission, COM, 144 final. Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

10. Taniguchi, E. Thompson, R. and Yamada, T. (2003). Visions for city logistics. In 3rd International Conference on City Logistics, Madeira, Portugal, 1-16, 2003.10.1108/9780080473222-001Search in Google Scholar

11. European Commission. (2006). Keep Europe moving - Sustainable mobility for our continent. COM 314 final. ISBN 92-79-02312-8. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Search in Google Scholar

12. Transportation Research Board. (2012). Guidebook for understanding urban goods movement. NCFRP Report 14, Washington, D.C.Search in Google Scholar

13. European Commission. (2014) Work programme 2014-2015. Horizon 2020.Search in Google Scholar

14. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. SAGE Publications Inc.Search in Google Scholar

15. Graindorge, T. and Breuil, D. (2014). Evaluation of the urban freight transportation projects. In Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment, April 14-17, 2014, Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

16. Balm, S., Browne, M., Leonardi, J. and Quak, H. (2014). Developing an evaluation framework for innovative urban and interurban freight transport solutions. Procd. Soc. Behv., 125, 386-397.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1482Search in Google Scholar

17. CITYLOG. (2012). Sustainability and efficiency of city logistics. CITYLOG, Final Report.Search in Google Scholar

18. ENCLOSE. (2014). Cross-evaluation of energy efficient, sustainable urban logistics measures in the ENCLOSE towns. Evaluation and Policy Tool. ENergy efficiency in City LOgistics Services for small and mid-sized European Historic Towns, Deliverable 5.1.Search in Google Scholar

19. CIVITAS-MIRACLES. (2006). Multi-initiative for rationalised accessibility and clean liveable environments. Last Report Publishable.Search in Google Scholar

20. BESTUFS. (2008). Quantification of urban freight transport effects II. Best Urban Freight Solutions, Deliverable 5.2.Search in Google Scholar

21. BESTFACT. (2013). Recommendation and policy tools. Best practice factory for freight transport, Deliverable 3.1.Search in Google Scholar

22. C-LIEGE. (2014). Clean last mile transport and logistics management for smart and efficient local governments in Europe. Towards clean urban freight transport, Final Report.Search in Google Scholar

23. FREILOT. (2011). Evaluation methodology and plan urban. Freight Energy Efficiency Pilot, Deliverable 4.1.Search in Google Scholar

24. CITYLAB. (2015). Definition of necessary indicators for evaluation. City Logistics in Living Laboratories, Deliverable 5.1.Search in Google Scholar

25. Mitropoulos, L.K. and Prevedouros, P.D. (2013). Assessment of sustainability for transportation vehicle,” Transp. Res. Record: Journal of the Trans. Res. B., 2344, 88-97.10.3141/2344-10Search in Google Scholar

26. Mitropoulos, L.K., Prevedouros, P.D. and Nathanail, E.G. (2011). Life cycle assessment through a comprehensive sustainability framework: A case study of urban transportation vehicles. In XXIVth World Road Congress, September 26-30, 2011. Mexico City, Mexico.Search in Google Scholar

27. Nathanail, E. and Papoutsis, K. (2013). Towards a sustainable urban freight transport and urban distribution. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering, 1(1), 58-63.10.12720/jtle.1.1.58-63Search in Google Scholar

28. Jeon, C.M., Amekudzi, A. and Guensler, R. (2008). Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: Performances and measures and indexes. In 87th Transportation Research Board Annual Conference. CD-ROM, January 13-17, 2008. Washington D.C.Search in Google Scholar

29. Nathanail, E., Gogas, M. and Adamos, G. (2016). Smart interconnections and urban freight transport towards achieving sustainable city logistics. Transp. Res. Proc. 14, 983 – 992.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.078Search in Google Scholar

30. Cellura, M., Longo, S. and Mistretta, M. (2011).The energy and environmental impacts of Italian household consumptions: An input output approach. Renew Sus. Energ. Rev. 15(8), 3897-3908. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.025.10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.025Search in Google Scholar

31. Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.P., Suh, S., Weidema, B.P. and Pennington, D.W. (2004). Life cycle assessment part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ. Int. 30, 701-720. DOI: ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005.10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Norris, G. (2001). Integrating life cycle cost analysis in LCA. Int. J Life Cycle Ass. 6(2), 118-120.10.1007/BF02977849Search in Google Scholar

33. Kloepffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int. J Life Cycle Ass. 13(2), 89–95.10.1065/lca2008.02.376Search in Google Scholar

34. Finkbeiner, M., Schau, M.S., Lehmann, A. and Traverso, M. (2010). Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2, 3309–3322.10.3390/su2103309Search in Google Scholar

35. Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M. and Tatari, O. (2015). Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States. Appl. Energ. 150, 36-49.10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.001Search in Google Scholar

36. NOVELOG. (2016). Understanding cities tool. New Cooperative Business Models and Guidance for Sustainable City Logistics, Deliverable D2.3.Search in Google Scholar

37. Bąk, M. Costs and fees in transport. WUG, Gdańsk, 110, [in Polish].Search in Google Scholar

38. European Commission. (2014). Update of the handbook on external costs of transport – Final report. RICARDO AEA.Search in Google Scholar

39. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (1999). Enterprise risk management – Integrated framework,” Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, Risk Management. Standards Australia, AS/NZS 4360:1999. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from: www.coso.org/.Search in Google Scholar

40. FERMA. (2002). A risk management standard. Federation of European Risk Management Associations,” 2002. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from: www.ferma.eu/risk-management/standards/risk-management-standard/.Search in Google Scholar

41. Kiba-Janiak, M. (2016). Risk management in the field of urban freight transport. Transp. Res. Proc. 16, 165-178.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.017Search in Google Scholar

42. Donnelly, R. (2007). A hybrid microsimulation model of freight flows. In Taniguchi, E. and Thompson, R.G. (Ed.), City Logistics V, (pp. 235–246).Institute of City Logistics, Kyoto.Search in Google Scholar

43. Valdivia, S., Ugaya, C., Hildenbrand, J., Traverso, M., Mazijn, B. and Sonnemann, G. (2013). Approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment – Our contribution to Rio+20. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 18(9), 1673-1685. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1.10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

44. Allen, J., Browne, M., Woodburn, A. and Leonardi, J. (2012). The role of urban consolidation centers in sustainable freight transport. Transport Rev. 32(32), 473-490.10.1080/01441647.2012.688074Search in Google Scholar

45. Santen, V. (2017). Towards more efficient logistics: Increasing load factor in a shipper’s road transport. Int. J. Logist. Manag., 28(2), 228-250. DOI.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2015-0071.10.1108/IJLM-04-2015-0071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

46. Organization for economic Co-Operation and Development. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators methodology and user guide. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from: http://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

47. Nathanail, E., Adamos, G. and Gogas. M. (2017). A novel framework for assessing sustainable urban logistics. Transp. Res. Proc. 25C, 1036-1045.10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.477Search in Google Scholar

48. Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590Search in Google Scholar