[1. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541-2619.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Ferent I, Mester A, Hlinomaz O, et al. Intracoronary Imaging for Assessment of Vascular Healing and Stent Follow-up in Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds. Current Medical Imaging Reviews. 2018. [Epub Ahead of Print.] doi : 10.2174/1573405614666180604093621.10.2174/1573405614666180604093621]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:61-68.10.1056/NEJM197907123010201]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Sigwart U, Urban P, Golf S, et al. Emergency stenting for acute occlusion after coronary balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1988;78:1121-1127.10.1161/01.CIR.78.5.1121]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, et al. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85:916-927.10.1161/01.CIR.85.3.916]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Benedek I, Benedek T. Angio computer tomografie multislice în diagnosticul bolilor cardiovasculare. Oradea: Editura Universității, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Raber L, Brugaletta S, Yamaji K, et al. Very late scaffold thrombosis: intracoronary imaging and histopathological and spectroscopic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1901-1914.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.853]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Gao R, Yang Y, Han Y, et al. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB China Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2298-2309.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.054]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Lemos PA, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT, et al. Unrestricted Utilization of Serolimus-Elutiing Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”: The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry. Circulation. 2004;109:190-195.10.1161/01.CIR.0000109138.84579.FA]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Kate FM, Morris SD, Smith HR, Rycroft RJ. Allergy in coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet. 2001;357:1205-1206.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04350-6]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Benedek T, Bucur O, Pascanu I, Benedek I. Analysis of coronary plaque morphology by 64 multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Endocrinologica. 2011;7:59-68.10.4183/aeb.2011.59]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Benedek I, Chitu M, Kovacs I, Bajka B, Benedek T. Incremental Value of preprocedural Coronary Computed Tomographic Angyography to classical Coronary Angiography for prediction of PCI complexity in left main stenosis. World Journal of Cardiovascular Disease. 2013;9:573-580.10.4236/wjcd.2013.39090]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker of plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014:55:22-28.10.1536/ihj.13-21324463925]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Benedek T, Gyongyosi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Collet C, Chevalier B, Cequier A, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:722-732.10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.01328734923]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Chien S. Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: the wisdom of the cell. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H1209-H1224.10.1152/ajpheart.01047.200617098825]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology. 2007;242:403-409.10.1148/radiol.242206006517255411]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Rist C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Academic Radiology. 2006;13:1465-1473.10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.04417138114]Search in Google Scholar
[19. De Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, Van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:331-340.10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa31220404736]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Pelberg R. Basic principles in Computed Tomography (CT). Cardiac CT angiography manual. London: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-1-4471-6690-0]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation. 2009;120:867-875.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.85928019704093]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:234-243.10.1007/s00330-007-0756-117929024]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Dawoud MA, Alarabawy RA, Abd Alla TM, Mubarak AA. Evaluation of coronary stents using multidetector CT. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016;47:793-801.10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.05.002]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Yoshimura M, Nao T, Miura T, et al. New quantitative method to diagnose coronary in-stent restenosis by 64-multislice computed tomography. J Cardiol. 2015;65:57-62.10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.03.01324846389]Search in Google Scholar