Cite

1. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541-2619.Search in Google Scholar

2. Ferent I, Mester A, Hlinomaz O, et al. Intracoronary Imaging for Assessment of Vascular Healing and Stent Follow-up in Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds. Current Medical Imaging Reviews. 2018. [Epub Ahead of Print.] doi : 10.2174/1573405614666180604093621.10.2174/1573405614666180604093621Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:61-68.10.1056/NEJM197907123010201Search in Google Scholar

4. Sigwart U, Urban P, Golf S, et al. Emergency stenting for acute occlusion after coronary balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1988;78:1121-1127.10.1161/01.CIR.78.5.1121Search in Google Scholar

5. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, et al. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85:916-927.10.1161/01.CIR.85.3.916Search in Google Scholar

6. Benedek I, Benedek T. Angio computer tomografie multislice în diagnosticul bolilor cardiovasculare. Oradea: Editura Universității, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

7. Raber L, Brugaletta S, Yamaji K, et al. Very late scaffold thrombosis: intracoronary imaging and histopathological and spectroscopic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1901-1914.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.853Search in Google Scholar

8. Gao R, Yang Y, Han Y, et al. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB China Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2298-2309.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.054Search in Google Scholar

9. Lemos PA, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT, et al. Unrestricted Utilization of Serolimus-Elutiing Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”: The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry. Circulation. 2004;109:190-195.10.1161/01.CIR.0000109138.84579.FASearch in Google Scholar

10. Kate FM, Morris SD, Smith HR, Rycroft RJ. Allergy in coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet. 2001;357:1205-1206.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04350-6Search in Google Scholar

11. Benedek T, Bucur O, Pascanu I, Benedek I. Analysis of coronary plaque morphology by 64 multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Endocrinologica. 2011;7:59-68.10.4183/aeb.2011.59Search in Google Scholar

12. Benedek I, Chitu M, Kovacs I, Bajka B, Benedek T. Incremental Value of preprocedural Coronary Computed Tomographic Angyography to classical Coronary Angiography for prediction of PCI complexity in left main stenosis. World Journal of Cardiovascular Disease. 2013;9:573-580.10.4236/wjcd.2013.39090Search in Google Scholar

13. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker of plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014:55:22-28.10.1536/ihj.13-21324463925Search in Google Scholar

14. Benedek T, Gyongyosi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164Search in Google Scholar

15. Collet C, Chevalier B, Cequier A, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:722-732.10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.01328734923Search in Google Scholar

16. Chien S. Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: the wisdom of the cell. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H1209-H1224.10.1152/ajpheart.01047.200617098825Search in Google Scholar

17. Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology. 2007;242:403-409.10.1148/radiol.242206006517255411Search in Google Scholar

18. Rist C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Academic Radiology. 2006;13:1465-1473.10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.04417138114Search in Google Scholar

19. De Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, Van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:331-340.10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa31220404736Search in Google Scholar

20. Pelberg R. Basic principles in Computed Tomography (CT). Cardiac CT angiography manual. London: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-1-4471-6690-0Search in Google Scholar

21. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation. 2009;120:867-875.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.85928019704093Search in Google Scholar

22. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:234-243.10.1007/s00330-007-0756-117929024Search in Google Scholar

23. Dawoud MA, Alarabawy RA, Abd Alla TM, Mubarak AA. Evaluation of coronary stents using multidetector CT. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016;47:793-801.10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.05.002Search in Google Scholar

24. Yoshimura M, Nao T, Miura T, et al. New quantitative method to diagnose coronary in-stent restenosis by 64-multislice computed tomography. J Cardiol. 2015;65:57-62.10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.03.01324846389Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2501-8132
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, other, Internal Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine and Intensive-Care Medicine