Widely Accepted Credibility Criteria for Online Health-related Information Are Not Correlated with Content Quality of Stroke Webpages in Two Languages of Central and Eastern European Countries

1. Nădăşan V. The Quality of Online Health-Related Information – an Emergent Consumer Health Issue. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2016;62:408-421.10.1515/amma-2016-0048Search in Google Scholar

2. Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:671-692.10.1093/her/16.6.67111780707Search in Google Scholar

3. Fahy E, Hardikar R, Fox A, Mackay S. Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape. Australas Med J. 2014;7:24-28.10.4066/AMJ.2014.1900392047324567763Search in Google Scholar

4. Health On the NET. The HONcode Principles. Available at: https://www.hon.ch/en/certification.html#principles (1 August 2018)Search in Google Scholar

5. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4:E15.10.2196/jmir.4.3.e15176194512554546Search in Google Scholar

6. The DISCERN Project. Available at: http://www.discern.org.uk/background_to_discern.php (1 August 2018)Search in Google Scholar

7. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997;277:1244-1245.10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039Search in Google Scholar

8. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Zullino D, Khan R. HON label and DISCERN as content quality indicators of health-related websites. Psychiatr Q. 2012;83:15-27.10.1007/s11126-011-9179-x21547515Search in Google Scholar

9. Barker S, Charlton NP, Holstege CP. Accuracy of internet recommendations for prehospital care of venomous snake bites. Wilderness Environ Med. 2010;21:298-302.10.1016/j.wem.2010.08.01621168781Search in Google Scholar

10. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki CE, Prokosch HU, Wynn R. Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:20.10.1186/1471-2296-12-20310111821496309Search in Google Scholar

11. Nădăşan V. Should Critical Care Professionals Take Hoaxes/Rumours Seriously? J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2016;2:205-206.Search in Google Scholar

12. Nădăşan V, Roşca AN, Tarcea M, Ábrám Z, Măruşteri M. The Quality of Romanian Breast Cancer Websites: a Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33:703-707.10.1007/s13187-016-1145-827888472Search in Google Scholar

13. Nădăşan V, Moldovan O. The Completeness and Accuracy of Information about Coeliac Disease on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2016;11:70-76.Search in Google Scholar

14. Nădăşan V, Ábrám Z. How credible are the Romanian health-related websites? A cross-sectional study. Acta Medica Transilvanica. 2016;21:1-4.Search in Google Scholar

15. Nădăşan V, Voidăzan S, Tarcea M, Ureche R. The quality of the information about influenza on the Romanian Internet. Acta Medica Transilvanica. 2011; 2:312-314.Search in Google Scholar

16. Nădăşan V, Vancea G, Georgescu PA, Tarcea M, Abram Z. The credibility, completeness and accuracy of information about first aid in case of choking on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2011;6:18-26.Search in Google Scholar

17. Nădăşan V, Moldovan G, Tarcea M, Ureche R. Edified or confused? How complete and accurate is the information about vitamin B12 on the Romanian Websites? Revista de Igienă şi Sănătate Publică Timişoara. 2011;61:49-57.Search in Google Scholar

18. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2000;321:1511-1515.10.1136/bmj.321.7275.15112755511118181Search in Google Scholar

19. Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ. 2002;324:581-582.10.1136/bmj.324.7337.5817899611884323Search in Google Scholar

20. Statcounter. Available at: http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/romania (2 August 2018)Search in Google Scholar

21. Granka LA, Joachims T, Gay G (2004) Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. Available at: https://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/granka_etal_04a.pdf (1 Aug 2018)10.1145/1008992.1009079Search in Google Scholar