The Role of Carotid Ultrasonography in Patients with High Risk of Atherosclerosis

1. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, et al. One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2007;291:1197-1206.10.1001/jama.297.11.119717374814Search in Google Scholar

2. McGill Jr, Henry C. Risk factors for atherosclerosis. The Thrombotic Process in Atherogenesis. Springer. 1978;104:273-280.10.1007/978-1-4684-7787-0_15Search in Google Scholar

3. Vrselja Z, Brkic H, Mrdenovic S, Radic R, Curic G. Function of circle of Willis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:578-584.10.1038/jcbfm.2014.7398210124473483Search in Google Scholar

4. Willeit J, Stefan K. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. A population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13;661-668.10.1161/01.ATV.13.5.6618485116Search in Google Scholar

5. Piotr S, Joshua B. Carotid Artery Disease. Circulation. 2006;114:244-247.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.542860Search in Google Scholar

6. Walker M, Marler R, Goldstein M, et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421-1428.10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035Search in Google Scholar

7. Griggs R, Bluth E. Noninvasive risk assessment for stroke: special emphasis on carotid atherosclerosis, sex-related differences, and the development of an effective screening strategy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:259-264.10.2214/AJR.10.555521257875Search in Google Scholar

8. Kakisis, JD, Avgerinos ED, Antonopoulos CN, et al. The European society of vascular surgery guidelines for carotid intervention: an updated independent assessment and literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:238-243.10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.01522658616Search in Google Scholar

9. Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;91:566-579.10.1161/01.CIR.91.2.566Search in Google Scholar

10. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.10.1055/s-0035-1556056457201326417185Search in Google Scholar

11. Loizou CP. A review of ultrasound common carotid artery image and video segmentation techniques. Springer. 2014;52:1073-1093.10.1007/s11517-014-1203-525284219Search in Google Scholar

12. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.10.1055/s-0035-1556056Search in Google Scholar

13. Serena J, Irimia P, Calleja S, Blanco M, Vivancos J, Ayo-Martín Ó. Cuantificación ultrasonográfica de la estenosis carotídea: recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Neurosonología. Neurología. 2013;28:435-442.10.1016/j.nrl.2012.07.01123040716Search in Google Scholar

14. AbuRahma AF, Wulu Jr JT, Crotty B. Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke. 2002;33:1772-1775.10.1161/01.STR.0000019127.11189.B5Search in Google Scholar

15. Polak JF, Shemanski L, O’Leary DH, et al. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. 1998;208:649-654.10.1148/radiology.208.3.97228419722841Search in Google Scholar

16. Prabhakaran S, Rundek T, Ramas R, et al. Carotid Plaque Surface Irregularity Predicts Ischemic Stroke The Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2006;37:2696-2701.10.1161/01.STR.0000244780.82190.a4265432417008627Search in Google Scholar

17. Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP. Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000;31:615-621.10.1161/01.STR.31.3.615Search in Google Scholar

18. Brinjikji W, Huston III J, Rabinstein A, et al. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:27-42.10.3171/2015.1.JNS14245226230478Search in Google Scholar

19. Lee W. General principles of carotid Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2014;33:11-17.10.14366/usg.13018405896924936490Search in Google Scholar

20. Sitzer M, Fürst G, Fischer H, et al. Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis. Stroke. 1993;24:1513-1518.10.1161/01.STR.24.10.15138378955Search in Google Scholar

21. Alexandrov A, Brodie DS, McLean A, et al. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke. 1997;28:339-342.10.1161/01.STR.28.2.339Search in Google Scholar

22. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology. 2003;229:340-346.10.1148/radiol.229203051614500855Search in Google Scholar

23. Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:251-261.10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.01519046904Search in Google Scholar

24. Evans NS. Carotid Artery Stenosis. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2016;24:47-56.Search in Google Scholar

25. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:16-94.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.00621288679Search in Google Scholar

26. Tahmasebpour HR, Buckley AR, Cooperberg PL, Fix CH. Sonographic examination of the carotid arteries. Radiographics. 2005;25:1561-1575.10.1148/rg.25604501316284135Search in Google Scholar

27. Boontje AH. External carotid artery revascularization: indications, operative techniques and results. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;33:315-318.Search in Google Scholar

28. Päivänsalo MJ, Siniluoto TM, Tikkakoski TA, Myllylä V, Suramo IJ. Duplex US of the external carotid artery. Acta Radiologica. 1996;37:41-45.10.1177/02841851960371P1088611322Search in Google Scholar

29. Ricotta A, AbuRahma E, Ascher M, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1-3.10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.03121889701Search in Google Scholar

30. Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke. 2003;34:660-664.10.1161/01.STR.0000057462.02141.6F12624288Search in Google Scholar

31. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;220:179-185.10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3517911425993Search in Google Scholar

32. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2004;63:457-460.10.1212/01.WNL.0000135154.53953.2C15304575Search in Google Scholar

33. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:517-522.10.2214/ajr.163.3.80798368079836Search in Google Scholar

34. Mester A, Oltean-Péter B, Rodean I, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Function Following Intracoronary and Intramyocardial Stem Cell Injection. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2:112-116.10.1515/jim-2017-0053Search in Google Scholar

35. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, et al. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1693-1700.10.1056/NEJM200006083422302Search in Google Scholar

36. Fox Allan J. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology. 1993;186:316-318.10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421726Search in Google Scholar

37. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445-453.10.1056/NEJM199108153250701Search in Google Scholar

38. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235-1243.10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-PSearch in Google Scholar

39. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, et al. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2440-2444.10.1161/01.STR.25.12.2440Search in Google Scholar

40. Saba L, Giorgio M. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:42-47.10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.06419464837Search in Google Scholar

41. Staikov IN, Arnold M, Mattle H, et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. J Neurol. 2000;247:681-686.10.1007/s00415007011011081806Search in Google Scholar

42. Craven TE, Ryu JE, Espeland MA, et al. Evaluation of the associations between carotid artery atherosclerosis and coronary artery stenosis. A case-control study. Circulation. 1990;82:1230-1242.10.1161/01.CIR.82.4.12302205416Search in Google Scholar

43. Salonen JT, Riitta S. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1245-1249.10.1161/01.ATV.11.5.1245Search in Google Scholar

44. Jashari F, Ibrahimi P, Nicoll R. Coronary and carotid atherosclerosis: similarities and differences. Atherosclerosis. 2013;227:193-200.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.11.00823218802Search in Google Scholar

45. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, et al. The role of carotid arterial intima-media thickness in predicting clinical coronary events. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:262-269.10.7326/0003-4819-128-4-199802150-00002Search in Google Scholar

46. Kablak-Ziembicka A, Tracz W, Przewlocki T, et al. Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease. Heart. 2004;90:1286-1290.10.1136/hrt.2003.025080Search in Google Scholar

47. Lester SJ, Eleid MF, Khandheria BK, Hurst RT. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Coronary Artery Calcium Score as Indications of Subclinical Atherosclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:229-233.10.4065/84.3.229Search in Google Scholar

48. Ikeda N, Kogame N, Iijima R, Nakamura M, Sugi K. Impact of carotid artery ultrasound and ankle-brachial index on prediction of severity of SYNTAX score. Circ J. 2013;77:712-716.10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1087Search in Google Scholar

49. Oei HH, Vliegenthart R, Hak AE, et al. The association between coronary calcification assessed by electron beam computed tomography and measures of extracoronary atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1745-1751.10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01853-3Search in Google Scholar