Open Access

European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU


Cite

Anunciação, P. F. & Zorrinho, C. (2006). Organizational Urbanism - How Managing Technological Shock in Companies, Lisbon, Sílabo Publishing (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

ASEAN. (2013). About ASEAN Single Window. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from http://asw.asean.orgSearch in Google Scholar

Bezic, H., Tijan, E., & Aksentijevic, S. (2011). Port Community Systems: economic feasibility evaluation. Osijek: University of OsijekSearch in Google Scholar

Carbone, V., & Martino, M. (2003). The Changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis. London: Taylor & Francis10.1080/0308883032000145618Search in Google Scholar

Carlan, V., Sys, C., & Vanelslander, T. (2015). Port Community System cost and benefits: from competition to collaboration within the supply chainSearch in Google Scholar

Competition Authority. (2015). Study on competition in the port sector (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

Doing Business. (2011). Doing Business 2012: Trading Across Borders. The World BankSearch in Google Scholar

EPCSA - European Port Community Systems Association - (2013a). EPCSA Policy Statement - May 2013: EU Port Policy ProposalsSearch in Google Scholar

EPCSA - European Port Community Systems Association - (2013b). Message Standards in the EUSearch in Google Scholar

ESPO - European Sea Ports Organisation. (2010). European Port Governance. Brussel: ESPOSearch in Google Scholar

ESPO - European Sea Ports Organisation. (2014). Position of the European Sea Ports Organisation on the implementation of reporting formalities Directive 2010/65/EU. Bruxelas: ESPOSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, “Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018. COM(2009) (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network. COM (2011) 650 final (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2013a). Blue Waist, a unique space for growth. COM(2013) 510 final (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2013b). Ports an engine for growth. COM(2013) 295 final (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2014a). Building the main transport network: the main network corridors and the Connecting Europe Facility. COM(2013) 940 finalSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2014b). Report from the Comission to the European Parliament and the Council: “on the functioning of Directive 2010/65/EU on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States. COM(2014) 320 finalSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015). National Single Window Guidelines. Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, Directorate D - Logistic, maritime & land transport and passenger rights, BrusselsSearch in Google Scholar

GS1. (2007). Logistics Interoperability Model, Version 1Search in Google Scholar

Hermans, P. (2015). The Zachman Framework for architecture revisited. On conceiving the informational enterprise. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from www.zachman.comSearch in Google Scholar

IMO. (2011). Guidelines for setting up a Single Window System in maritime transport. FAL.5/Circ.36Search in Google Scholar

IPCSA. (2011). White Paper: The role of Port Community Systems in the development of the Single Window. BrusselsSearch in Google Scholar

ISO 28005-1. (2013). Security management systems for the supply chain - Electronic port clearance (EPC) - Part 1: Message structureSearch in Google Scholar

ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010. (2011). Systems and software engineering - Architecture descriptionSearch in Google Scholar

Josey, A. (2011). TOGAF Version 9.1 Enterprise Edition: An Introduction. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/catalog/W118Search in Google Scholar

Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis. New York: SpringerSearch in Google Scholar

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2010). Management Information Suystems: Managing the digital firm. New Jersey: PearsonSearch in Google Scholar

Lee-Partrige, J., Teo, T., & Lim, V. (2000). Information technology management: the case od the Port of Singapore Authority. Jornal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(1), 85-99.10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00035-4Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. (2009). Port Community Systems. World Customs Jornal, 3, 63-67Search in Google Scholar

Mobility and Transport Authority. (2016). Follow-up of the Port Market: Report for December 2015 (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

Notteboom, T. (2008). The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chain. Paris: OECD/ITF10.1787/9789282102251-3-enSearch in Google Scholar

OECD/ITF. (2008). Port Competion and hinterland connections. Paris: OECD/ITFSearch in Google Scholar

OECD/ITF. (2015). The impact of Mega-Ships. Paris: OECD/ITFSearch in Google Scholar

Pereira, C. M., & Sousa, P. (2004). A method to define an enterprise architecture using the Zachman Framework. Nicosia, Cyprus: SAC ‘0410.1145/967900.968175Search in Google Scholar

Rodon, J., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a Port Community System. 19th Bled eConference. BledSearch in Google Scholar

Rodrigue, J. (2010). Maritime Transportation: Drivers for the Shipping and Port Industries. Leipzig: OECD/ITFSearch in Google Scholar

Rodrigues, L. (2014). Determining Factors of the Value of Enterprise Architectures, New Academic editions Publishing (In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

Sessions, R. (2007). A comparison between the four main methodologies of corporate architecture. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from https://msdn.microsoft.com/pt-br/library/bb466232.aspx(In Portuguese)Search in Google Scholar

Smit, S. (2014). A Comparison of Port Community Systems: A framework to compare Port Community Systems and an application to the Port Community Systems of Hamburg, Rotterdam and Antwerp. Rotterdam: Master ThesisSearch in Google Scholar

Srour, F. J., van Oosterhout, M., van Baalen, P., & Zuidwijk, R. (2007). Port Community System Implementation: Lessons Learned from an International Scan. RotterdamSearch in Google Scholar

Tijan, E., Kos, S., & Ogrizovic, D. (2009). Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity in Port Community Systems. Rijeka: University of RijekaSearch in Google Scholar

Tsen, J. K. (2001). Ten years of Single Window implementation: Lessons learned for the future. Global Trade Facilitation Conference 2011Search in Google Scholar

UN/CEFACT. (2005). Recommendation and Guidelines on establishing a Single Window: to enhance the efficient exchange of information between trade and government. United Nations, The United Nations Center for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business. Geneva: United Nations PublicationsSearch in Google Scholar

UNCTAD. (2004). Assessment of seaport land interface: an analytical framework. UNCTAD. UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/MISC/2004/3Search in Google Scholar

UNECE. (2011). Single Window Implementation Framework. Geneva and New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

Van Oosterhout, M., Zielinski, M., & Tan, Y. (2000). Inventory of flows & processes in the port. Virtuele Haven [Virtual Port], deliverable T2.D1aSearch in Google Scholar

WCO. (2008). Single Window Information Store. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/activities-and-programmes/single-window/single-window.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

WCO. (2011). WCO Compendium: How to build a Single Window Environment, Volume 1 The executive guide. World Customs OrganisationSearch in Google Scholar

Zachman, J. (2008). John Zachman’s concise definition of the Zachman Framework. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from www.zachman.comSearch in Google Scholar

Zachman, J. A. (2016). The framework for enterprise architecture: background, description and utility. Retrieved June 22, 2016, from www.zachman.comSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2256-0173
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Political Economics, other, Business Management, Law, Commercial Law, Social Sciences, Education