[Baronaitė, M. (2010). Naudotų apgadintų transporto priemonių muitinio vertinimo ypatumai [Particularities of Used Damaged Motor Vehicles Evaluation for Customs Purposes]. Teisė, 77, 66-67.10.15388/Teise.2010.0.200]Search in Google Scholar
[Bikelis, S. (2012). Permąstant sankcijas už kontrabandą: proporcingumo problema (I). Proporcingumo principas ir bausmės už kontrabandą [Rethinking Sanctioning for Trafficking of Goods: The Problem of Proportionality (I). Issues of Confication and Tax Duties]. Teisės problemos, 4(78), 5-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bikelis, S. (2013). Permąstant sankcijas už kontrabandą: proporcingumo problema (II). Konfiskavimo ir mokestinių priemonių taikymo klausimai [Rethinking Sanctioning for Trafficking of Goods: The Problem of Proportionality (II). Issues of Confication and Tax Duties]. Teisės problemos, 1(79), 43-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bikelis, S. (2015). Baudžiamosios ir mokesčių teisės sankirta: atsakomybė už neteisėtą praturtėjimą ir non bis indem principas [Crossroad of Criminal and Tax Law: Liability for Illicit Enrichment in the Context of Non Vis in Idem Principle]. Teisės problemos, 2(88), 54-69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bikelis, S., et al. (2017). Cigarečių neteisėta apyvarta: kompleksinė reiškinio ir kontrolės priemonių analizė [Illegal Turnover of Cigarettes: Complex Analysis of Phenomena and Control Measures]. Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės institutas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Byla C-263/06, Carboni e derivati Srl v. Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Riunione Adriatica di Sicurtà SpA, 2008 E.C.R. I-01077.]Search in Google Scholar
[Binding Tariff Information (BTI) – efificiency and new working methods. Note to the CPG 27 (2011). Brussels: TAXUD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Broberg, M. P. (2008). Acte clair Revisited: Adapting the acte clair criteria to the demands of the times. Common Market Law Review, 45, 1383-1397.10.54648/COLA2008095]Search in Google Scholar
[Broberg, M. P., & Fenger, N. (2014). Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[C-291/15, EURO 2004. Hungary Kft. v. National Tax and Customs Office Western Transdanubian Regional Customs and Finance Directorate, 2016 EU:C:2016:455.]Search in Google Scholar
[C-58/14, Hauptzollamt Hannover v. Amazon EU Sàrl, 2015 EU:C:2015:385.]Search in Google Scholar
[C-74/13, GSV Kft. prieš Nemzeti Adó-és Vámhivatal Észak-Alföldi Regionális Vám-és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága Debreceni Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság, 2014 EU:C:2014:243.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-116/12, Ioannis Christodoulou and Others v. Elliniko Dimosio, 2013 EU:C:2013:825.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-153/10, Staatssecretaris van Financiën v. Sony Supply Chain Solutions (Europe) BV., 2010 E.C.R. I-02775.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-250/11, Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v. Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė ir Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos, 2012 EU:C:2012:496.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-154/16, „Latvijas Dzelzceļš” VAS v. Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, 2017 EU:C:2017:392.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-156/16, Tigers GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Landshut, 2017 EU:C:2017:754.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-180/12, Stoilov i Ko EOOD v. Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna, 2013 EU:C:2013:693.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-199/09, Schenker SIA v. Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, 2010 E.C.R. I-12311.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-233/15, SIA „Oniors Bio” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, 2016 EU:C:2016:305.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-250/11, Lietuvos geležinkeliai v. Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė, Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos, 2012 EU:C:2012:496.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-286/15, Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v. SIA “Latvijas propāna gāze”, 2016 EU:C:2016:363.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-290/01, Receveur principal des douanes de Villepinte v. Derudder & Cie SA, and Tang Frères, 2004 E.C.R. I-02041.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-291/11, Staatssecretaris van Financiën v. TNT Freight Management (Amsterdam) BV, 2011 EU:C:2012:459.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-3/13, Baltic Agro AS v. Maksu- ja Tolliameti Ida maksu- ja tollikeskus, 2014 EU:C:2014:2227.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-320/11, Digitalnet OOD and Others v. Nachalnik na Mitnicheski punkt — Varna Zapad pri Mitnitsa Varna, 2012 EU:C:2012:745.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-35/93, Develop Dr. Eisbein GmbH & Co. v. Hauptzollamt Stuttgart-West, 1994 E.C.R. I-02655.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-371/09, Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v. Isaac International Limited, 2010 E.C.R. I-07727.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-382/09, Stils Met SIA v. Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, 2010 E.C.R. I-09315.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-409/10, Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen v. Afasia Knits Deutschland GmbH, 2011 E.C.R. I-13331.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-416/15, Selena România v. Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) București, 2016 EU:C:2016:501.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-430/14, State Revenue Service v. Arthur Stretinski, 2016 EU:C:2016:43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-438/11, Lagura Vermögensverwaltung v. Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen, 2012 EU:C:2012:703.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-450/12, HARK GmbH & Co. KG, Kamin-und Kachelofenbau v. Hauptzollamt Duisburg, 2013 EU:C:2013:824.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-46/16, Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v. “LS Customs Services”, 2017 EU:C:2017:839.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-47/16, Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v. “Veloserviss” SIA, 2017 EU:C:2017:220.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-472/12, Panasonic Italia SpA, Panasonic Marketing Europe GmbH, Scerni Logistics Srl v. Agenzia delle Dogane di Milano, 2014 EU:C:2014:2082.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-48/98, Firma Söhl & Söhlke v. Hauptzollamt Bremen, 1999 E.C.R. I-07877.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-546/13, Agenzia delle Dogane, Ufficio di Verona dell’Agenzia delle Dogane v. ADL American Dataline Srl, 2014 EU:C:2014:2348]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-547/13, SIA “Oliver Medical” v. Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, 2015 EU:C:2015:139.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-558/11, SIA „Kurcums metal” v. Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, 2012 EU:C:2012:721.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-571/12, Greencarrier Freight Services Latvia SIA v. Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, 2014 EU:C:2014:102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-595/11, Steinel Vertrieb GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Bielefeld, 2013 EU:C:2013:251.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-63/06, UAB Profisa v. Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos, 2007 E.C.R. I-03239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-635/13, SC ALKA CO SRL v. Autoritatea Națională a Vămilor - Direcția Regională pentru Accize și Operațiuni Vamale Galați and Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului București, 2015 EU:C:2015:268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case C-666/13, Rohm Semiconductor GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Krefeld, 2014 EU:C:2014:2388.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case Case C-354/09, Gaston Schul BV v. Commission Staatssecretaris van Financiën, 2010 E.C.R. I-07449.]Search in Google Scholar
[Case Case C-373/08, Hoesch Metals and Alloys GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Aachen, 2010 E.C.R. I-00951.]Search in Google Scholar
[Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee “On the State of Customs Union”, COM(2012) 791 final. (2012). [Accessed 20.04.2019]. Available from Internet: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0791&from=lt.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1987). Official Journal, L 256.]Search in Google Scholar
[Court of Auditors (2008). Special report No. 2/2008 on binding tariff information with the answers of the Commission. Official Journal, C 103/01.]Search in Google Scholar
[Craig, P. (2010). The Classics of EU Law Revisited: CILFIT and Foto-Frost. The Past and Future of EU Law: the Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Oxford: Hart Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Craig, P., & de Burca, G. (2015). EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania of 30 April 2014 in the administrative case No. A-261-146/2014. Available from Internet: <https://eteismai.lt/byla/86557037859732/A-261-146-14>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania of 1 September 2016 in the administrative case No. A-377-556/2016. Available from Internet: <https://eteismai.lt/byla/151489826098556/A-377-556/2016>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 5 March 2013 in the administrative case No. A-442-709/2013, 2013.. Available from Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/detalipaieska.aspx?detali=2>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Díaz Gavier, P., & Rovetta, D. (2011). A Survey of the EU Tariff Classification Case Law in Year 2010. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 6(7), 319-324.10.54648/GTCJ2011039]Search in Google Scholar
[EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (2012). Official Journal, C 326.]Search in Google Scholar
[EU Monitor. (2012). „Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2012)64 - Union Customs Code”. [Accessed 15.04.2019]. Available from Internet: https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j4nvhdfdk3hydzq_j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vix6t9sb46yj.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giriūnienė, G., et al. (2016). VAT Fraud in EU. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gurevičienė, J. (2005). Tarifinio prekių klasifikavimo sistema [Tariff Classification Work System]. Jurisprudence, 73(65), 39–47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Javorcik, B. S., & Narciso, G. (2013). Accession to the World Trade Organization and Tariff Evasion. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP9592, 1-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valantiejus, G. & Katuoka, S. (2017). Application of the WTO Agreements in National Courts: Comparative Aspects of Worldwide and Lithuanian Judicial Practices. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 3(2): 195-212.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kolliker, A. (2006). Flexibility and European Unification: The Logic of Differentiated Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lasiński-Sulecki, K. (2015). Will the Court of Justice apply its anti-abuse doctrine in customs valuation cases? World Customs Journal, 9(2), 3-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laurinavičius, A., et al. (2014). Muitinė tarptautinės prekybos logistinė grandinėje [Customs in International Trade Logistical Chain]. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lietuvos Respublikos mokesčių administravimo įstatymas [the Law on Tax Administration of the Republic of Lithuania] (2004). Valstybės žinios, 63 (2243).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lietuvos Respublikos muitinės įstatymas [Law on Customs of the Republic of Lithuania] (2016). Register of Legal Acts, 26857.]Search in Google Scholar
[Limbach, K. (2015). Uniformity of Customs Administration in the European Union. Oxford: Hart Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyons, T. (2018). EU Customs Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198784029.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lučinskienė, A., & Rimkus, V. Mokestinių sutarčių vieta tarptautinio apmokestinimo teisinio reguliavimo šaltinių hierarchijoje [Position and Role of Tax Treaties in the Hierarchy of the Sources of Legal Regulation on International Taxation]. Societal Studies 3, 7 (2010): 197-211.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lukas, M. (2013). Valstybių konkurencijos mokesčiais įtaka nacionaliniam mokesčių teisiniam reguliavimui [The influence of international tax competition on national tax legislation] (doctoral dissertation). Available from Internet: http://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:1922808/datastreams/MAIN/content.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lukas, M., Medelienė, A. & Paulauskas, A. (2014). Impact of Membership in the European Union on the Lithuanian National Taxation System, From G. Švedas (ed.), Lithuanian Legal System under the Influence of European Union Law: Collection of Scientific Articles (p. 499-543). Vilnius: Faculty of Law, Vilnius University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Medelienė, A. (2012). Principai, kaip mokesčių teisės normų aiškinimo ir taikymo instrumentas nagrinėjant mokestinius ginčus [Principles as an Instrument for Interpreting and Applying Tax Law in Tax Disputes], From G., Švedas (ed.), Nepriklausomos Lietuvos teisė: praeitis, dabartis ir ateitis: recenzuotų mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys (p. 321-343). Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Medelienė, A., & Paulauskas, A. (2008). Sandorio vertė kaip prekių muitinio įvertinimo pagrindas [Transaction Value as a Key Concept of Customs Valuation]. Teisė 67, 25-47.10.15388/Teise.2008.0.360]Search in Google Scholar
[Medelienė, A., & Vasiliauskas, V. (2012). Europos Sąjungos teisės taikymas nagrinėjant mokestinius ginčus Lietuvoje [The Application of European Union Law in Tax Disputes in Lithuania], From V. Valančius (ed.), Žmogus, teisinė valstybė ir administracinė justicija: mokslo studija, skirta Lietuvos vyriausiojo administracinio teismo dešimtmečiui (p. 700-733). Vilnius: Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milinis, A., & Pranevičienė, K. (2016). Conditions and Circumstances which Lead to Application to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Adoption of a Preliminary Ruling. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 9(2), 130-149.10.1515/bjlp-2016-0015]Search in Google Scholar
[Novačkova, D. (2013). International Trade Economic Measures Applied in Slovakia. Czech Yearbook of International Law, IV, 143-159.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Puzinskaitė, E. (2013). Mokesčio apskaičiavimas taikant turinio viršenybės prieš formą principą [Tax Calculation Using the Principle of Substance Over Form]. Jurisprudence, 20(4), 1409-1426.10.13165/JUR-13-20-4-07]Search in Google Scholar
[Puzinskaitė, E., & Klišauskas, R. (2012). Mokesčių teisės sistema ir apmokestinimo principai [Tax Law System and Charging Principles]. Jurisprudence, 19(2), 675-695.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radžiukynas, J. (2003). Kai kurios importuojamų prekių muitinės vertės nustatymo problemos [Certain Problems on Customs Valuation of Import Goods]. Jurisprudence 46(38), 98-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radžiukynas, J. (2005). Importuojamų prekių muitinio įvertinimo kontrolė Lietuvos muitinėje Europos Bendrijos muitinių strategijos kontekste [Customs Valuation Control of Imported Goods in The Lithuanian Customs in the Context of Customs Strategy of EU]. Jurisprudence, 73(65), 48-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radžiukynas, J., & Belzus, A. (2008). Importuojamų prekių muitinis įvertinimas ir kontrolė [Customs Valuation and Control of Imported Goods]. Vilnius: Lietuvos pramonės, prekybos ir amatų rūmų asociacija.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rauch, J. E. (1999). Networks Versus Markets in International Trade. Journal of International Economics 48, 7-35.10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00009-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Regulation No. 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code. (2013). Official Journal, L 269/1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodriguez, E. V., & Dulguerova, E. (2013) Blues at the Border: The Quest for Uniform Tariff Classification in the European Union. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 8(11), 368-381.10.54648/GTCJ2013050]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruling of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania of 20 August 2014 in the administrative case No. A-261-144/2014. Available from Internet: <https://eteismai.lt/byla/50951964777036/A-261-144-14>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarapinienė, S., & Avižienis, J. Š. Muitinės procedūros [Customs Procedures]. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shu-Chien, C. (2016). In the name of legal certainty? Comparison of advance ruling systems for tariff classification in the European Union, China and Taiwan. World Customs Journal, 10(2), 47-64]Search in Google Scholar
[Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2012). Official Journal, C 326.]Search in Google Scholar
[Truel, C., & Maganaris, E. (2015). Breaking the code: the impact of the Union Customs Code on international transactions. World Customs Journal, 9(2), 12-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turičnik, E. (2014). Preliminary Reference Procedure – the Right, the Duty and Exceptions. InterEULawEast: Journal for the International and European Law, Economics and Market Integrations, 1(1), 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valančius, V., & Kavalnė, S. (2009). Europos Sąjungos teisės įgyvendinimas Lietuvos administracinėje teisėje: monografija [Implementation of European Union Law in Lithuanian Administrative Law: Monograph]. Vilnius: Registrų centras.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valantiejus, G. (2016). Application of Soft Law Instruments in International Economic Law: Insights on the Lithuanian Practice on the Legal Regulation of Customs Duties. Social Transformations in Contemporary Society 4, 97-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valantiejus, G. (2016). Application of Rules on Burden of Proving the Customs Origin of Imported Goods in International Trade: Problematic Aspects in Lithuania. Whither our economies - 2016: 5th International Scientific Conference, October 20-21, 2016; Conference Proceedings, 124-136.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vermulst, E. (2008). Origin Rules in EU Anti-Dumping Law and Practice: An Update. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 3(10), 337-348;10.54648/GTCJ2008044]Search in Google Scholar
[Vermulst, E. (2015). EU Anti-Circumvention Rules: Do They Beat the Alternative? European University Institute Working Paper RSCAS 57, 1-19.10.2139/ssrn.2637796]Search in Google Scholar
[Walsh, T. (2015). European Union Customs Code. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.]Search in Google Scholar
