[
Altbach, P. G. and Peterson, P. M. 2007. Higher Education in the New Century: Global Challenges and Innovative Ideas. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies 58 (2): 277-297.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arellano, M. and Bover, O. 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 29-51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Auranen, O. and Nieminen, M. 2010. University research funding and publication performance - An international comparison. Research Policy 39 (6): 822-834.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beath, J., Owen, R. F., Poyago-Theotoky, J. and Ulph, D. 2003. Optimal incentives for income-generation in universities: the rule of thumb for the Compton tax. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (9): 1301-1322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bégin-Caouette, O., Schmidt, E. K. and Field, C. C. 2017. The perceived impact of four funding streams on academic research production in Nordic countries: the perspectives of system actors ‘. Science and Public Policy 44 (6): 789-801.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blume-Kohout, M. E., Kumar, K. B. and Sood, N. 2014. University R&D funding strategies in a changing federal funding environment. Science and Public Policy 42 (3): 355-368.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blundell, R. and Bond, S. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115-143.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breitung, J. 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, edited by B. H. Baltagi, 161-177. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Choi, I. 2001. Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 20 (2): 249-272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
David, P. A., Hall, B. H. and Toole, A. A. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29 (4-5): 497-529.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dechenaux, E., Thursby, J. and Thursby, M. 2011. Inventor moral hazard in university licensing: The role of contracts. Research Policy 40 (1): 94-104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diamond, A. 1999. Does federal funding crowd in private funding of science?. Contemporary Economic Policy 17 (4): 423-443.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29 (2): 109-123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B. R. C. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29 (2): 313-330.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geuna, A. 1999. The Economics of Knowledge Production: Funding and the Structure of University Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guellec, D. and Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter?. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics 66 (3): 353-378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, L. P. 1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50 (4): 1029-1054.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, L. P. and Hodrick, R. J. 1980. Forward exchange rates as optimal predictors of future spot rates: An econometric analysis. Journal of political economy 88 (5): 829-853.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harman, G. 2001. University-industry research partnerships in Australia: extent, benefits and risks. Higher Education Research & Development 20 (3): 245-264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115 (1): 53-74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jonkers, K. and Zacharewicz, T. 2016. Research performance based funding systems: a comparative assessment. Report No. JRC101043. European Commission Joint Research Centre: Seville.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kao, C. and Chiang, M. H. 2000. On the estimation and inference of cointegrated regression in panel data. Advances in Econometrics 15: 179-222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kristkova, Z. 2013. Analysis of private RD effects in a CGE model with capital varieties: The case of the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 63 (3): 262-287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lanahan, L., Graddy-Reed, A. and Feldman, M. P. 2016. The Domino Effects of Federal Research Funding. PLoS ONE 11 (6): 1-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levin, A., Lin, C. F. and Chu, C. S. J. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108 (1): 1-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S. 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61(S1): 631-652.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. 2015. Frascati Manual 2015. Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en (accessed August 15, 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohrman, K., Ma, W. and Baker, D. 2008. The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher education policy 21 (1): 5-27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D. and Vallanti, G. 2013. Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities?. Research Policy 42 (1): 63-75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nickell, S. 1981. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49 (6): 1417-1426.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedroni, P. 2000. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous coin-tegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics 15: 93-130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedroni, P. 2001. Purchasing power parity tests in cointe-grated panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (4): 727-731.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedroni, P. 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20 (3): 597-625.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K. 2007. University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International journal of management reviews 9(4): 259-280.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, P. C. B. and Moon, H. R. 1999. Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica 67 (5): 1057-1111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, J. L. 2007. Resource allocation in public research universities. Review of Higher Education 30 (2): 125-144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strehl, F., Reisinger, S. and Kalatschan, M. 2007. Funding Systems and their Effects on Higher Education Systems. OECD Education Working Papers (6): 1-118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tavoletti, E. 2010. Matching higher education with the labour market in the knowledge economy: The much-needed reform of university governance in Italy. Industry and Higher Education 24 (5): 361-375.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 