[Abramovsky, L., Simpson, H. 2011. Geographic proximity and firm-university innovation linkages: Evidence from Great Britain. Journal of Economic Geography 11:949-977.10.1093/jeg/lbq052]Search in Google Scholar
[Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, edited by R. Nelson, 609-625. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400879762-024]Search in Google Scholar
[Aschhoff, B., Schmidt, T. 2008. Empirical evidence on the success of R&D cooperation – happy together?. Review of Industrial Organization 33:41-62.10.1007/s11151-008-9179-7]Search in Google Scholar
[d’Aspremont, C., Jacquemin, A. 1988. Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopol with Spillovers. American Economic Review 78:1133-1137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Audretsch, D., Caiazza, R. 2016. Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer 41:1247-1259.10.1007/s10961-015-9441-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Baghana, R., Mohnen, P. 2009. Effectiveness of R&D tax incentives in small and large enterprises in Québec. Small Business Economics 33:91-107.10.1007/s11187-009-9180-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Bagwell, K., Staiger, R. 1994. The sensitivity of strategic and corrective R&D policy in oligopolistic industries. Journal of International Economics 36:133-150.10.1016/0022-1996(94)90061-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Barajas, A., Huergo, E., Moreno, L. 2012. Measuring the economic impact of research joint ventures supported by the EU Framework Programme. The Journal of Technology Transfer 37:917-942.10.1007/s10961-011-9222-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, B. 2015. Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys 29:917-942.10.1111/joes.12074]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, W. Dietz, J. 2004. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms – evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy 33:209-223.10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V., Lokshin, B., Carree, M., Sastre, J. 2018. The antecedents of new R&D collaborations with different partner types: On the dynamics of past R&D collaboration and innovative performance. Long Range Planning 51:285-302.10.1016/j.lrp.2017.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Besley, T., Suzumura, K. 1992. Taxation and welfare in an oligopoly with strategic commitment. International Economic Review 33:413-431.10.2307/2526902]Search in Google Scholar
[Bezdrob, M., Šunje, A. 2014. Management Innovation – Designing and Testing A Theoretical Model. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 9:16-29.10.2478/jeb-2014-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloch, C., Graversen, E. 2012. Additionality of public R&D funding for business R&D – A dynamic panel data analysis. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9:204-220.10.1504/WRSTSD.2012.047688]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., Williams, H. 2019. A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33:163-184.10.1257/jep.33.3.163]Search in Google Scholar
[Boldrin, M., Levine, D. 2013. The Case Against Patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27:3-22.10.1257/jep.27.1.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Bravo-Ortega, C., Marin, A. 2011. R&D and productivity: A two-way avenue?. World Development 39:1090-1107.10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Carboni, O. 2011. R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: Evidence from Italian manufacturing data. International Review of Applied Economics 25:419-439.10.1080/02692171.2010.529427]Search in Google Scholar
[Cassiman, B. 2000. Research joint ventures and optimal R&D policy with asymmetric information. International Journal of Industrial Organization 18:283-314.10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00013-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, A. 2018. Tax policy endogeneity: evidence from R&D tax credits. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 27:809-833.10.1080/10438599.2017.1415001]Search in Google Scholar
[Che, X., Yang, Y. 2009. Patent Protection with Cooperative R&D Option. MPRA Paper No. 19436.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chowdhury, P. 2005. Patents and R&D: The Tournament Effect. Economics Letters 89:120-126.10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.020]Search in Google Scholar
[Comino, S., Manenti, F., Thumm, N. 2019. The Role of Patents in Information and Communication Technologies: A Survey of the Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 33:404-430.10.1111/joes.12277]Search in Google Scholar
[Czarnitzki, D., Toole, A. 2006. Patent protection, market uncertainty, and R&D investment. ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 06-056, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim.10.2139/ssrn.925621]Search in Google Scholar
[Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., Fier, A. 2007. The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22:1347-1366.10.1002/jae.992]Search in Google Scholar
[Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., Rosa, J. 2011. Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy 40:217-229.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017]Search in Google Scholar
[David, P., Hall, B., Toole, A. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29:497-529.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Delbono, F., Denicolo, V. 1991. Incentives to Innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:951-961.10.2307/2937936]Search in Google Scholar
[Duguet, E. 2004. Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data. Revue D’Economie Politique 114:263-292.10.2139/ssrn.421920]Search in Google Scholar
[Flath, D. 2012. Are there any Cournot industries in Japan?. The Japanese Economy 39: 3-36.10.2753/JES1097-203X390201]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia-Quevedo, J. 2004. Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos 57:87-102.10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00244.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Grossman, G., Helpman, D. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Herrera, F. 2019. Innovation practices in emerging economies: Do university partnerships matter?. The Journal of Technology Transfer 44:615-646.10.1007/s10961-017-9578-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, B., van Reenen, J. 2000. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29:449-469.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Harryson, S., Kliknaite, S., Dudkowski, R. 2007. Making innovative use of academic knowledge to enhance corporate technology innovation impact. International Journal of Technology Management 39:131-157.10.1504/IJTM.2007.013504]Search in Google Scholar
[Hashi, I., Stojčić, N. 2013. The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy 42:353-366.10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Hattori, M., Tanaka, Y. 2019. General analysis of dynamic oligopoly with sticky price. Economics Bulletin 39:2990-2998.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodžić, S. 2012. Research and Development and Tax Incentives. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 7:51-62.10.2478/v10033-012-0014-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Howitt, P., Aghion, P. 1998. Capital accumulation and innovation as complementary factors in long-run growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3:111-130.10.1023/A:1009769717601]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaffe, A. 1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79:957-970.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kafouros, M. 2005. R&D and productivity growth: Evidence from the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14:479-497.10.1080/1043859042000269098]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamien, M., Muller, E., Zang, I. 1992. Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels. American Economic Review 82:1293-1306.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamien, M., Zang, I. 2000. Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization 18:995-1012.10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00054-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Karbowski, A. 2019. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in product innovation and firm performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management 20:1121-1142.10.3846/jbem.2019.11050]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlsson, C., Andersson, M. 2009. The location of industry R&D and the location of university R&D - How are they related? In New Directions in Regional Economic Development. Advances in Spatial Science. Dordrecht and New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-01017-0_15]Search in Google Scholar
[Kräkel, M. 2004. R&D spillovers and strategic delegation in oligopolistic contests. Managerial and Decision Economics 25:147-156.10.1002/mde.1142]Search in Google Scholar
[Leahy, D., Neary, J. 1997. Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. American Economic Review 87:642-662.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lokshin, B., Mohnen, P. 2012. How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. Applied Economics 44:1527-1538.10.1080/00036846.2010.543083]Search in Google Scholar
[Mahmutaj, L., Krasniqi, B. 2020. Innovation types and sales growth in small firms evidence from Kosovo. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 15:27-43.10.2478/jeb-2020-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, S. 2006. Competition policy, collusion, and tacit collusion. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24:159-176.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.04.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. 1998. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Research Policy 27:273-284.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00048-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Miyagiwa, K. 2009. Collusion and Research Joint Ventures. The Journal of Industrial Economics 57:768-784.10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00399.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mulkay, B., Mairesse, J. 2013. The R&D tax credit in France: Assessment and ex-ante evaluation of the 2008 reform. NBER Working Paper 19073.10.3386/w19073]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67:297-306.10.1086/258177]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, R. 1986. Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. American Economic Review 76:186-189.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nordhaus, W. 1969. Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. Chapter 5. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Mahony, M., Vecchi, M. 2009. R&D, knowledge spillovers and company productivity performance. Research Policy 38:35-44.10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Pejic-Bach, M., Lojpur, A., Pekovic, S., Stanovčić, T. 2015. Influence of Different Information Sources to Innovation Performance: Evidence from France, Netherlands and Croatia. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 10:89-101.10.1515/jeb-2015-0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Penin, J. 2005. Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look. Research Policy 34:641-656.10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Penin, J. 2012. Strategic uses of patents in markets for technology: A story of fabless firms, brokers and trolls. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 84:633-641.10.1016/j.jebo.2012.09.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Petit, M., Tolwinski, B. 1999. R&D cooperation or competition?. European Economic Review 43:185-208.10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00111-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Petrin, T. 2018. A Literature Review on the Impact and Effectiveness of Government Support for R&D and Innovation. ISIgrowth Working Paper 5/2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rant, M., Černe, S. 2017. Becoming a hidden champion: From selective use of customer intimacy and product leadership to business attractiveness. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 12:89-103.10.1515/jeb-2017-0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002-1037.10.1086/261420]Search in Google Scholar
[Scandura, A. 2016. University-industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. Research Policy 45:1907-1922.10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Schot, J., Steinmueller, W. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47:1554-1567.10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Somaya, D. 2012. Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management 38:1084-1114.10.1177/0149206312444447]Search in Google Scholar
[Stojčić, N., Srhoj, S., Coad, A. 2020. Innovation procurement as capability-building: Evaluating innovation policies in eight Central and Eastern countries. European Economic Review 121:103330.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103330]Search in Google Scholar
[Woodward, D., Figueiredo, O., Guimaraes, P. 2006. Beyond the Silicon Valley: University R&D and high-technology location. Journal of Regional Science 60:15-32.10.1016/j.jue.2006.01.002]Search in Google Scholar