Open Access

(Dis)Advantages af Decentralization Models Driven by Non-Economic Reasons: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina

   | Aug 24, 2018

Cite

Afonso, A. and Fernandes, S. 2008. Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of Local Government. Journal of Socio-Economics 37 (5).10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Akai, N. and Sakata, M. 2002.Fiscal Decentralization Contributes to Economic Growth : Evidence from State- Level Cross-Section Data for the Unites States. Journal of Urban Economics 52(1): 93-108.10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00018-9Search in Google Scholar

Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Easterly, W. 2002. Redistributive public employment. Journal of Urban Economics 48: 219-241.10.1006/juec.1999.2164Search in Google Scholar

Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Tortosa-Ausina, E, and Prior, D. 2007. On the determinants of local government performance: A two stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review 51 (2): 425-451.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Bird R.M. and Vaillancourt, F. 1998. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: An Overview. Cambridge University Press 1-48.10.1017/CBO9780511559815.002Search in Google Scholar

Bird, R.M. 2010. Subnational taxation in developing countries: a review of the literature. Policy Research Working Paper 5450. World Bank: Washington, DC.10.1596/1813-9450-5450Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Breton, A. 1983. Federalism versus centralism in regional growth. In Biehl, D., Roskamp, K.W., and Stolper, W.F., eds, Public Finance and Economic Growth: Proceedings of the International Institute of Public Finance Tokyo 1981. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brueckner, J.K. 1982. A Test of Allocative Efficiency in the Local Public Sector. Journal of Public Economics 19(1982): 311-331.10.1016/0047-2727(82)90059-7Search in Google Scholar

Burg, S.L.and Shoup, P.S. 1999. The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Ethnic Conflict and International Intervention. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.Search in Google Scholar

Cadez, S. and Czerny, A. 2010. Carbon Management Strategies in Manufacturing Companies: An Exploratory Note. Journal for East European Management Studies 15(4):348-360.10.5771/0949-6181-2010-4-348Search in Google Scholar

Conyers, D. 1984. Decentralisation and Development: A review of the Literature. Public Administration and Development Vol. 4.10.1002/pad.4230040207Search in Google Scholar

Canning, D. and M. Fay 1993. The Effects of Transportation Networks on Economic Growth. Columbia University Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Dabla-Norris, E. 2006. The Challenge of Fiscal Decentralization in Transition Countries. Comparative Economic Studies 48: 100-131.10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100063Search in Google Scholar

Dabla-Norris, E. and Wade, P. 2002. The Challenge of Fiscal Decentralisation in Transition Countries. IMF Working Paper No.02/103.10.5089/9781451852707.001Search in Google Scholar

Davoodi, H. and Zou, H. 1998, Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Urban Economics 43:244-257.10.1006/juec.1997.2042Search in Google Scholar

Deprins, D. and Simar L. 1983. On Farrell measures of technical efficiency. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 49(2): 123-137.10.1017/S0770451800082178Search in Google Scholar

Easterly W. and Levine, R. 1997. Africa’s Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (4): 1203-1250.10.1162/003355300555466Search in Google Scholar

Ebel, R.D., and Yilmaz, S. 2002. On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralization. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 2809, Washington, D.C.10.1596/1813-9450-2809Search in Google Scholar

Efendic, A. 2018. The role of economic and social capital during the floods in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In Dzihic,V. and Solska, M. (eds.) Crisis Governance in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia. The Study of Floods in 2014. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Efendic, A. and Pugh G. 2018. The effect of ethnic diversity on income - an empirical investigation using survey data from post-conflict environment. Economics: The Open- Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 12 (2018-17): 1-34.10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-17Search in Google Scholar

Fjeldstad, O.H. and Moore, M. 2008. Tax reform and state building in a globalized world. In Deborah Braütigam, Odd-Helge Fjeldstad and Mick Moore eds. Taxation and state building in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490897.010Search in Google Scholar

Hayden, R.M. 2005. Democracy without demos?. The Bosnian constitutional experiment and the intentional Construction of non-functional states. East European Politics and Societies 19 (2):226-5910.1177/0888325404272679Search in Google Scholar

Jin, J. and Zou, H. 2002. How Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Aggregate, National, and Subnational Government Size. Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2): 270-293.10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00004-9Search in Google Scholar

Kalb, A. 2010. The impact of intergovernmental grants on cost efficiency: Theory and evidence from German municipalities. Economic Analysis and Policy 40 (1).10.1016/S0313-5926(10)50002-XSearch in Google Scholar

Kluggman, J. 1994. Decentralisation: A survey of literature from a human development perspective. United Nations Development Programme Occasional Paper 13, Human Development Report Office.Search in Google Scholar

Klun, M. 2004. Performance Measurement for Tax Administrations: The Case of Slovenia. International Review of Administrative Sciences 70 (3): 567-574.10.1177/0020852304046210Search in Google Scholar

Kolstad, I. and Fieldstad, O.H. 2006. Fiscal decentralisation and corruption: A brief overview of the issues. CHI CHR Institute, Bergen, Norway.Search in Google Scholar

Koopmans, T.C. 1951. Activity analysis of production and allocation. John Wiley: New York.Search in Google Scholar

Lane, J. E. 2000. New Public Management. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., 1999. The Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15: 222-279.10.1093/jleo/15.1.222Search in Google Scholar

Levy, B. 2006. Governance, Corruption and cial Accountability. Presentation to the TFESSD Consultations. World Bank, Washington DCSearch in Google Scholar

Loikkanen, H.A., Susiluoto, I., and Funk, M. 2011. The Role of City Managers and External Variables in Explaining Efficiency Differences of Finnish Municipalities. Helsinki Center of Economic Research Discussion Paper No.312.Search in Google Scholar

Lovell, C.A.K. 1993. Production frontiers and productive efficiency, in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications (Eds.) H. Fried, C.A.K.10.1093/oso/9780195072181.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lovell and S. Schmidt. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Mahabil, J. 2011. Measuring efficiency of local government expenditure; AN FDH Analysis of a sample of South African municipalities. In Technical report to financial and fiscal commission of SA.Search in Google Scholar

Martinez-Vazquez, J. and McNabb, R. 2003. Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth. World Development 31.10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00109-8Search in Google Scholar

Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 681-712.10.2307/2946696Search in Google Scholar

Meloche, J., Vaillancourt, F. and Yilmaz, S. 2004. Decentralisation or Fiscal Autonomy? What Does Really Matter? Effects on growth and public sector size in European transition countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3254Search in Google Scholar

Mill, J.S. 1861. Considerations on representative government in utilitarianism, liberty and representative government. J.M. Dent: London.10.1037/12186-000Search in Google Scholar

Musgrave, R. 1959. The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-HillSearch in Google Scholar

Nieswand, M. and Seiferd, S. 2011. Some determinants of intermediate local government spending efficienc: Evidence from French departments. DIW Berlin discussion paper 1130.10.2139/ssrn.1858752Search in Google Scholar

Oates, W.E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Prud’homme, R. 1995. The Dangers of Decentralization. World Bank Research Observer 10 (2): 201-220.10.1093/wbro/10.2.201Search in Google Scholar

Raboca, H.M., Lazar I., Lazar P.S. and Zagan-Zelter, D. 2010. An Exploratory Analysis of the Management Capacity Within the Local Public Administration from Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, No. 31E: 133-146.Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Gill, N. 2003. The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning, Government and Policy 21: 333-351.10.1068/c0235Search in Google Scholar

Ruggiero, J. 2007. A comparison of DEA and the stochastic frontier model using panel data. International Transactions in Operational Research 14 (3): 259-266.10.1111/j.1475-3995.2007.00585.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schoepflin, G. 1993. The rise and fall Yugoslavia. In McGarry, J., O’Leary, B., The politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation. Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts. London and New York.Search in Google Scholar

Seabright, P. 1996. Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review 40 (1): 61-89.10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0Search in Google Scholar

Shah, A. 2004. Fiscal decentralisation in developing and transition economies. World Bank policy research working paper 3282.10.1596/1813-9450-3282Search in Google Scholar

Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. 1999, Of Course we can bootstrap DEA scores! But does it mean anything ? Logic trumps wishful thinking. Journal of Productivity Analysis 11: 93-97.10.1023/A:1007739507007Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. 1946. The Proverbs of Administration. Public Administration Review 6 (1).10.2307/973030Search in Google Scholar

Simonsen, S. G. 2005. Addressing ethnic divisions in postconflict institution-building: Lessons from recent cases. Security Dialogue 36(3): 297-318.10.1177/0967010605057017Search in Google Scholar

Smoke, P. 2013. Why theory and practice are different: The gap between principles and reality in subnational revenue systems. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper 13-13.10.4337/9781783474332.00017Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, F.W. 1911. The Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper and Brothers.Search in Google Scholar

Thiessen, U. 2003. Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high income OECD countries. Fiscal studies 23(3).10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00084.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tiebout, C. 1956. A pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416-424.10.1086/257839Search in Google Scholar

Treisman, D. 2002. Defining and Measuring Decentralisation: A Global Perspective, Working Paper, University of California Los Angeles, CA.Search in Google Scholar

Tullock, G. 1969. Federalism: problems of scale. Public Choice 6: 19-29.10.1007/BF01718575Search in Google Scholar

UNDP 2008. Decentralization in the Europe and CIS Region. Discussion Paper, Democratic Governance Practice, Bratislava Regional Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Väyrynen, R. 1991. New Directions in Conflict Theory: Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1922. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkley, California Press, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, S. 2012. Consociationalism: Power sharing and selfgovernance’, in Wolff, S. and Yakinthou, C. (eds.) Conflict Management in Divided Societies: Theories and Practice, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203803004Search in Google Scholar

World Bank n.d. Decentralisation toolkit. Retrieved from: http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/toolkit9.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2233-1999
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Business Management, other, Political Economics