This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Bartlett, C., Sterne, J., & Egger, M. (2002). What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers. British Medical Journal, 325(7355), 81–84.BartlettC.SterneJ.&EggerM.2002What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapersBritish Medical Journal3257355818410.1136/bmj.325.7355.8111712912114239Search in Google Scholar
Brodie, M., Hamel, E. C., Altman, D. E., Blendon, R. J., & Benson, J. M. (2003). Health news and the American public, 1996–2002. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28(5), 927–950.BrodieM.HamelE. C.AltmanD. E.BlendonR. J.&BensonJ. M.2003Health news and the American public, 1996–2002Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law28592795010.1215/03616878-28-5-92714604217Search in Google Scholar
Chang, C. (2015). Inaccuracy in health research news: A typology and predictions of scientists’ perceptions of the accuracy of research news. Journal of Health Communication, 20(2), 177–186.ChangC.2015Inaccuracy in health research news: A typology and predictions of scientists’ perceptions of the accuracy of research newsJournal of Health Communication20217718610.1080/10810730.2014.91774625411833Search in Google Scholar
Clark, F., & Illman, D. L. (2006). A longitudinal study of the New York Times science times section. Science Communication, 27(4), 496–513.ClarkF.&IllmanD. L.2006A longitudinal study of the New York Times science times sectionScience Communication27449651310.1177/1075547006288010Search in Google Scholar
Conrad, P. (1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8(4), 285–302.ConradP.1999Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the newsPublic Understanding of Science8428530210.1088/0963-6625/8/4/302Search in Google Scholar
De Semir, V., Ribas, C., & Revuelta, G. (1998). Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topic. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 294–295. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.294De SemirV.RibasC.&RevueltaG.1998Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topicJournal of the American Medical Association280329429510.1001/jama.280.3.2949676688Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dudo, A. (2015). Scientists, the media, and the public communication of science. Sociology Compass, 9(9), 761–775. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12298DudoA.2015Scientists, the media, and the public communication of scienceSociology Compass9976177510.1111/soc4.12298Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Entwistle, V. (1995). Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers. BMJ, 310(6984), 920.EntwistleV.1995Reporting research in medical journals and newspapersBMJ310698492010.1136/bmj.310.6984.92025492977719187Search in Google Scholar
Evans, W. (1995). The mundane and the arcane: Prestige media coverage of social and natural science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 168–177.EvansW.1995The mundane and the arcane: Prestige media coverage of social and natural scienceJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly72116817710.1177/107769909507200114Search in Google Scholar
Fanelli, D. (2013). Any publicity is better than none: Newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in Italy. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1167–1177. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0925-0FanelliD.2013Any publicity is better than none: Newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in ItalyScientometrics9531167117710.1007/s11192-012-0925-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fogg-Rogers, L., Grand, A., & Sardo, M. (2015). Beyond dissemination—science communication as impact. Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), C01–CO7.Fogg-RogersL.GrandA.&SardoM.2015Beyond dissemination—science communication as impactJournal of Science Communication143C01–CO710.22323/2.14030301Search in Google Scholar
Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.LandisJ.R.&KochG.G.1977The measurement of observer agreement for categorical dataBiometrics33115917410.2307/2529310Search in Google Scholar
Lewison, G. (2002). From biomedical research to health improvement. Scientometrics, 54(2), 179–192. doi: 10.1023/A:1016005710371LewisonG.2002From biomedical research to health improvementScientometrics54217919210.1023/A:1016005710371Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lewison, G., & Turnbull, T. (2010). News in brief and features in new scientist magazine and the biomedical research papers that they cite, August 2008 to July 2009. Scientometrics, 85(1), 345–359.LewisonG.&TurnbullT.2010News in brief and features in new scientist magazine and the biomedical research papers that they cite, August 2008 to July 2009Scientometrics85134535910.1007/s11192-010-0221-9Search in Google Scholar
Lewison, G., Tootell, S., Roe, P., & Sullivan, R. (2008). How do the media report cancer research? A study of the UK’s BBC website. British Journal of Cancer, 99(4), 569–576.LewisonG.TootellS.RoeP.&SullivanR.2008How do the media report cancer research? A study of the UK’s BBC websiteBritish Journal of Cancer99456957610.1038/sj.bjc.6604531252783618665166Search in Google Scholar
Mellor, F., Webster, S., & Bell, A. R. (2011) Content analysis of the BBC’s science coverage. Science Communication Group, Imperial College London. http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/science_impartiality/appendix_a.pdfMellorF.WebsterS.&BellA. R.2011Content analysis of the BBC’s science coverage. Science Communication GroupImperial College Londonhttp://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/science_impartiality/appendix_a.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Moriarty, C. M., Jensen, J. D., & Stryker, J. E. (2010). Frequently cited sources in cancer news coverage: A content analysis examining the relationship between cancer news content and source citation. Cancer Causes and Control, 21(1), 41–49.MoriartyC. M.JensenJ. D.&StrykerJ. E.2010Frequently cited sources in cancer news coverage: A content analysis examining the relationship between cancer news content and source citationCancer Causes and Control211414910.1007/s10552-009-9432-x19784789Search in Google Scholar
Moynihan, R., Bero, L., Ross-Degnan, D., Henry, D., Lee, K., Watkins, J., & Soumerai, S. B. (2000). Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(22), 1645–1650.MoynihanR.BeroL.Ross-DegnanD.HenryD.LeeK.WatkinsJ.&SoumeraiS. B.2000Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medicationsNew England Journal of Medicine342221645165010.1056/NEJM20000601342220610833211Search in Google Scholar
Pellechia, M. G. (1997). Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 6(1), 49–68.PellechiaM. G.1997Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapersPublic Understanding of Science61496810.1088/0963-6625/6/1/004Search in Google Scholar
Porter, M. F. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3), 130–137.PorterM. F.1980An algorithm for suffix strippingProgram14313013710.1108/eb046814Search in Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650–663.SchäferM. S.2012Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of sciencePublic Understanding of Science21665066310.1177/096366251038755923832152Search in Google Scholar
Van Trigt, A. M., De Jong-Van Den Berg, L. T. W., Haaijer-Ruskamp, F. M., Willems, J., & Tromp, T. F. J. (1994). Journalists and their sources of ideas and information on medicines. Social Science and Medicine, 38(4), 637–643.Van TrigtA.M.De Jong-Van Den BergL.T. W.Haaijer-RuskampF.M.WillemsJ.&TrompT.F. J.1994Journalists and their sources of ideas and information on medicinesSocial Science and Medicine38463764310.1016/0277-9536(94)90261-5Search in Google Scholar
Weigold, M. F. (2001). Communicating science: A review of the literature. Science Communication, 23(2), 164–193.WeigoldM. F.2001Communicating science: A review of the literatureScience Communication23216419310.1177/1075547001023002005Search in Google Scholar
Weitkamp, E. (2003). British newspapers privilege health and medicine topics over other science news. Public Relations Review 29(3), 321–33.WeitkampE.2003British newspapers privilege health and medicine topics over other science newsPublic Relations Review2933213310.1016/S0363-8111(03)00041-9Search in Google Scholar
