Open Access

Practice and Challenge of International Peer Review: A Case Study of Research Evaluation of CAS Centers for Excellence

 and    | Aug 30, 2019

Cite

Cheng, J.P., Li, X.X., & Xu, F. (2018). Science-evaluation reform on the road in China. National Science Review, 5(5), 605–605.ChengJ.P.LiX.X.&XuF.2018Science-evaluation reform on the road in ChinaNational Science Review5560560510.1093/nsr/nwy081Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, X. (2019). Tenure-track system activates teachers. Department of Physics, Tsinghua University. Retrieved from http://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9914/2011/20111111084759369801776/20111111084759369801776_.htmlChengX.2019Tenure-track system activates teachers. Department of PhysicsTsinghua UniversityRetrieved fromhttp://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9914/2011/20111111084759369801776/20111111084759369801776_.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

DaiWai, M.O. (2019). Peer review is a collaborative process. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 51(3), 107–107.DaiWaiM.O.2019Peer review is a collaborative processJournal of Neuroscience Nursing51310710710.1097/JNN.000000000000044530964842Search in Google Scholar

De Wit, K., Van Heffen, O., & Verhoeven, J. (1998). Government, higher education and the national economy. Case study of Flanders. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1431.5526De WitK.Van HeffenO.&VerhoevenJ.1998Government, higher education and the national economyCase study of Flanders10.13140/2.1.1431.5526Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gunashekar, S., Wooding, S., & Guthrie, S. (2017). How do NIHR peer review panels use bibliometric information to support their decisions? Scientometrics, 112(3), 1813–1835.GunashekarS.WoodingS.&GuthrieS.2017How do NIHR peer review panels use bibliometric information to support their decisions?Scientometrics11231813183510.1007/s11192-017-2417-8553385028804180Search in Google Scholar

ISTIC, Statistical results of Chinese scientific papers in 2017. Retrieved from https://www.istic.ac.cn/ScienceEvaluateArticalShow/tabid/679/Default.aspx?ArticleID=97570ISTIC, Statistical results of Chinese scientific papers in 2017Retrieved fromhttps://www.istic.ac.cn/ScienceEvaluateArticalShow/tabid/679/Default.aspx?ArticleID=97570Search in Google Scholar

KNAW, VSNU, NOW. (2014). Standard Evaluation Protocol 2015 – 2021, Protocol for Research Assessment in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/publicaties/standard-evaluation-protocol-2015-2021KNAW, VSNU, NOW2014Standard Evaluation Protocol 2015 – 2021, Protocol for Research Assessment in the NetherlandsAmsterdamRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and SciencesRetrieved fromhttps://www.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/publicaties/standard-evaluation-protocol-2015-2021Search in Google Scholar

Marušić, A., Brezis, E., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). Scientometrics of peer review. Scientometrics, 113(1), 501–502.MarušićA.BrezisE.&SquazzoniF.2017Scientometrics of peer reviewScientometrics113150150210.1007/s11192-017-2518-4562922229056787Search in Google Scholar

Peng, D.L. (2013). The Chinese Academy of Sciences invited international experts to evaluate the Institute of History of Natural Sciences. Studies in the History of Natural Sciences, 32(3), 423–426.PengD.L.2013The Chinese Academy of Sciences invited international experts to evaluate the Institute of History of Natural SciencesStudies in the History of Natural Sciences323423426Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, R., Guns, R., Jakaria Rahman, A.I.M., & Engels, T. C.E. (2017). Measuring cognitive distance between publication portfolios. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 583–594.RousseauR.GunsR.Jakaria RahmanA.I.M.&EngelsT. C.E.2017Measuring cognitive distance between publication portfoliosJournal of Informetrics11258359410.1016/j.joi.2017.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Shuai, L.Y. (2004). Evaluation experience of max planck society. Science and Technology Policy and Development Strategy, (11), 27–33.ShuaiL.Y.2004Evaluation experience of max planck societyScience and Technology Policy and Development Strategy112733Search in Google Scholar

Wu, J., Liang, M., & Zheng, Y. (2012). International evaluation of NSFC’s performance by evidence-based design. Science Research Management, 33(6), 137–145.WuJ.LiangM.&ZhengY.2012International evaluation of NSFC’s performance by evidence-based designScience Research Management336137145Search in Google Scholar

Xu, F., Liu, W.B., & Li, X.X. (2014). The method and enlightenment of REF research influence evaluation in UK. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T., 35(7), 9–15.XuF.LiuW.B.&LiX.X.2014The method and enlightenment of REF research influence evaluation in UK. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T357915Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J. (2019). Thoughts on long-term international assessment in colleges and departments. Guangming Daily. Retrieved from http://plan.sjtu.edu.cn/info/1004/1004.htmZhangJ.2019Thoughts on long-term international assessment in colleges and departmentsGuangming DailyRetrieved fromhttp://plan.sjtu.edu.cn/info/1004/1004.htmSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2543-683X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Computer Sciences, Information Technology, Project Management, Databases and Data Mining