This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.D. (2005). Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees’ decisions. Scientometrics, 63(2), 297–320.BornmannL.&DanielH.D.2005Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees’ decisions63229732010.1007/s11192-005-0214-2Search in Google Scholar
Chang, J., & Liu, J.H. (2019). Methods and practices for institutional benchmarking based on research impact and competitiveness. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(3), 55–72.ChangJ.&LiuJ.H.2019Methods and practices for institutional benchmarking based on research impact and competitiveness43557210.2478/jdis-2019-0015Search in Google Scholar
Engels, T.C.E., & Guns, R. (2018). The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 45–60.EngelsT.C.E.&GunsR.2018The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model34456010.2478/jdis-2018-0020Search in Google Scholar
Noyons, E.C. (2019). Measuring societal impact is as complex as ABC. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(3), 6–21.NoyonsE.C.2019Measuring societal impact is as complex as ABC4362110.2478/jdis-2019-0012Search in Google Scholar
Pao, M.L., & Goffman, W. (1990). Quality assessment of schistosomiasis literature. In: Informetrics 89/90 (Egghe & Rousseau, Eds.), (229–242). Amsterdam: Elsevier.PaoM.L.&GoffmanW.1990Quality assessment of schistosomiasis literatureInEgghe & Rousseau, Eds229242AmsterdamElsevierSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2018). The Norwegian model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 3–19.SivertsenG.2018The Norwegian model in Norway3431910.2478/jdis-2018-0017Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., Rousseau, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Measuring scientific production with modified fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 679–694.SivertsenG.RousseauR.&ZhangL.2019Measuring scientific production with modified fractional counting13267969410.1016/j.joi.2019.03.010Search in Google Scholar
Vanlee, F., & Ysebaert, W. (2019). Disclosing and evaluating artistic research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(3), 35–54.VanleeF.&YsebaertW.2019Disclosing and evaluating artistic research43355410.2478/jdis-2019-0014Search in Google Scholar
Wouters, P., Sugimoto, C.R., Larivière, V., McVeigh, M.E., Pulverer, B., de Rijcke, S., & Waltman, L. (2019). Rethink impact factors: Find new ways to judge a journal. Nature, 569(7758), 621–623.WoutersP.SugimotoC.R.LarivièreV.McVeighM.E.PulvererB.de RijckeS.&WaltmanL.2019Rethink impact factors: Find new ways to judge a journal569775862162310.1038/d41586-019-01643-331138924Search in Google Scholar
Xu, F., & Li, X.X. (2019). Practice and challenge of international peer review: A case study of research evaluation of CAS centers for excellence. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(3), 22–34.XuF.&LiX.X.2019Practice and challenge of international peer review: A case study of research evaluation of CAS centers for excellence43223410.2478/jdis-2019-0013Search in Google Scholar